The quest to find extraterrestrial life is a critical scientific endeavor with civilization-level implications. Icy moons in our solar system are promising targets for exploration because their liquid oceans make them potential habitats for microscopic life. However, the lack of a precise definition of life poses a fundamental challenge to formulating detection strategies. To increase the chances of unambiguous detection, a suite of complementary instruments must sample multiple independent biosignatures (e.g., composition, motility/behavior, and visible structure). Such an instrument suite could generate 10,000x more raw data than is possible to transmit from distant ocean worlds like Enceladus or Europa. To address this bandwidth limitation, Onboard Science Instrument Autonomy (OSIA) is an emerging discipline of flight systems capable of evaluating, summarizing, and prioritizing observational instrument data to maximize science return. We describe two OSIA implementations developed as part of the Ocean Worlds Life Surveyor (OWLS) prototype instrument suite at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The first identifies life-like motion in digital holographic microscopy videos, and the second identifies cellular structure and composition via innate and dye-induced fluorescence. Flight-like requirements and computational constraints were used to lower barriers to infusion, similar to those available on the Mars helicopter, "Ingenuity." We evaluated the OSIA's performance using simulated and laboratory data and conducted a live field test at the hypersaline Mono Lake planetary analog site. Our study demonstrates the potential of OSIA for enabling biosignature detection and provides insights and lessons learned for future mission concepts aimed at exploring the outer solar system.

Recently, knowledge-enhanced methods leveraging auxiliary knowledge graphs have emerged in relation extraction, surpassing traditional text-based approaches. However, to our best knowledge, there is currently no public dataset available that encompasses both evidence sentences and knowledge graphs for knowledge-enhanced relation extraction. To address this gap, we introduce the Knowledge-Enhanced Relation Extraction Dataset (KERED). KERED annotates each sentence with a relational fact, and it provides knowledge context for entities through entity linking. Using our curated dataset, We compared contemporary relation extraction methods under two prevalent task settings: sentence-level and bag-level. The experimental result shows the knowledge graphs provided by KERED can support knowledge-enhanced relation extraction methods. We believe that KERED offers high-quality relation extraction datasets with corresponding knowledge graphs for evaluating the performance of knowledge-enhanced relation extraction methods. Our dataset is available at: \url{https://figshare.com/projects/KERED/134459}

Data for which a set of objects is described by multiple distinct feature sets (called views) is known as multi-view data. When missing values occur in multi-view data, all features in a view are likely to be missing simultaneously. This leads to very large quantities of missing data which, especially when combined with high-dimensionality, makes the application of conditional imputation methods computationally infeasible. We introduce a new imputation method based on the existing stacked penalized logistic regression (StaPLR) algorithm for multi-view learning. It performs imputation in a dimension-reduced space to address computational challenges inherent to the multi-view context. We compare the performance of the new imputation method with several existing imputation algorithms in simulated data sets. The results show that the new imputation method leads to competitive results at a much lower computational cost, and makes the use of advanced imputation algorithms such as missForest and predictive mean matching possible in settings where they would otherwise be computationally infeasible.

Yet, several recent poorly on "unusual" data, which can frequently coincide works have raised the issue that pruning may induce or exacerbate with marginalized groups. Given the recent popularity of bias in the output of the compressed model. Despite compression methods in deployment settings [13,18,19,27] existing evidence for this phenomenon, the relationship and the fact that, for massive models, compression is often between neural network pruning and induced bias is necessary to enable model deployment, these findings raise not well-understood. In this work, we systematically investigate the question of whether the bias due to compression can be and characterize this phenomenon in Convolutional exactly characterized, and in particular whether bias is an Neural Networks for computer vision. First, we show that it inherent side-effect of the model compression process. is in fact possible to obtain highly-sparse models, e.g. with In this paper, we perform an in-depth analysis of bias in less than 10% remaining weights, which do not decrease in compressed vision models, providing new insights on this accuracy nor substantially increase in bias when compared phenomenon, as well as a set of practical, effective criteria to dense models. At the same time, we also find that, at for identifying samples susceptible to biased predictions, higher sparsities, pruned models exhibit higher uncertainty which can be used to significantly attenuate bias. in their outputs, as well as increased correlations, which Our work starts from a common setting to study bias we directly link to increased bias. We propose easy-to-use and bias mitigation [28, 29, 40, 50]: we study properties of criteria which, based only on the uncompressed model, establish sparse residual convolutional neural networks [25], in particular whether bias will increase with pruning, and identify ResNet18, applied for classification on the CelebA the samples most susceptible to biased predictions postcompression.

Machine learning (ML) based approaches are increasingly being used in a number of applications with societal impact. Training ML models often require vast amounts of labeled data, and crowdsourcing is a dominant paradigm for obtaining labels from multiple workers. Crowd workers may sometimes provide unreliable labels, and to address this, truth discovery (TD) algorithms such as majority voting are applied to determine the consensus labels from conflicting worker responses. However, it is important to note that these consensus labels may still be biased based on sensitive attributes such as gender, race, or political affiliation. Even when sensitive attributes are not involved, the labels can be biased due to different perspectives of subjective aspects such as toxicity. In this paper, we conduct a systematic study of the bias and fairness of TD algorithms. Our findings using two existing crowd-labeled datasets, reveal that a non-trivial proportion of workers provide biased results, and using simple approaches for TD is sub-optimal. Our study also demonstrates that popular TD algorithms are not a panacea. Additionally, we quantify the impact of these unfair workers on downstream ML tasks and show that conventional methods for achieving fairness and correcting label biases are ineffective in this setting. We end the paper with a plea for the design of novel bias-aware truth discovery algorithms that can ameliorate these issues.

Due to the mismatch between the source and target domains, how to better utilize the biased word information to improve the performance of the automatic speech recognition model in the target domain becomes a hot research topic. Previous approaches either decode with a fixed external language model or introduce a sizeable biasing module, which leads to poor adaptability and slow inference. In this work, we propose CB-Conformer to improve biased word recognition by introducing the Contextual Biasing Module and the Self-Adaptive Language Model to vanilla Conformer. The Contextual Biasing Module combines audio fragments and contextual information, with only 0.2% model parameters of the original Conformer. The Self-Adaptive Language Model modifies the internal weights of biased words based on their recall and precision, resulting in a greater focus on biased words and more successful integration with the automatic speech recognition model than the standard fixed language model. In addition, we construct and release an open-source Mandarin biased-word dataset based on WenetSpeech. Experiments indicate that our proposed method brings a 15.34% character error rate reduction, a 14.13% biased word recall increase, and a 6.80% biased word F1-score increase compared with the base Conformer.

The simultaneous quantile regression (SQR) technique has been used to estimate uncertainties for deep learning models, but its application is limited by the requirement that the solution at the median quantile ({\tau} = 0.5) must minimize the mean absolute error (MAE). In this article, we address this limitation by demonstrating a duality between quantiles and estimated probabilities in the case of simultaneous binary quantile regression (SBQR). This allows us to decouple the construction of quantile representations from the loss function, enabling us to assign an arbitrary classifier f(x) at the median quantile and generate the full spectrum of SBQR quantile representations at different {\tau} values. We validate our approach through two applications: (i) detecting out-of-distribution samples, where we show that quantile representations outperform standard probability outputs, and (ii) calibrating models, where we demonstrate the robustness of quantile representations to distortions. We conclude with a discussion of several hypotheses arising from these findings.

Machine Learning (ML) software has been widely adopted in modern society, with reported fairness implications for minority groups based on race, sex, age, etc. Many recent works have proposed methods to measure and mitigate algorithmic bias in ML models. The existing approaches focus on single classifier-based ML models. However, real-world ML models are often composed of multiple independent or dependent learners in an ensemble (e.g., Random Forest), where the fairness composes in a non-trivial way. How does fairness compose in ensembles? What are the fairness impacts of the learners on the ultimate fairness of the ensemble? Can fair learners result in an unfair ensemble? Furthermore, studies have shown that hyperparameters influence the fairness of ML models. Ensemble hyperparameters are more complex since they affect how learners are combined in different categories of ensembles. Understanding the impact of ensemble hyperparameters on fairness will help programmers design fair ensembles. Today, we do not understand these fully for different ensemble algorithms. In this paper, we comprehensively study popular real-world ensembles: bagging, boosting, stacking and voting. We have developed a benchmark of 168 ensemble models collected from Kaggle on four popular fairness datasets. We use existing fairness metrics to understand the composition of fairness. Our results show that ensembles can be designed to be fairer without using mitigation techniques. We also identify the interplay between fairness composition and data characteristics to guide fair ensemble design. Finally, our benchmark can be leveraged for further research on fair ensembles. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first and largest studies on fairness composition in ensembles yet presented in the literature.

The aim of this research paper is to look into the use of continuous authentication with mobile touch dynamics, using three different algorithms: Neural Network, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Support Vector Machine. Mobile devices are constantly increasing in popularity in the world, today smartphone subscriptions have surpassed 6 billion. Mobile touch dynamics refer to the distinct patterns of how a user interacts with their mobile device, this includes factors such as touch pressure, swipe speed, and touch duration. Continuous authentication refers to the process of continuously verifying a user's identity while they are using a device, rather than just at the initial login. This research used a dataset of touch dynamics collected from 40 subjects using the LG V30+. The participants played four mobile games, PUBG, Diep.io, Slither, and Minecraft, for 10 minutes each game. The three algorithms were trained and tested on the extracted dataset, and their performance was evaluated based on metrics such as accuracy, precision, false negative rate, and false positive rate. The results of the research showed that all three algorithms were able to effectively classify users based on their individual touch dynamics, with accuracy ranging from 80% to 95%. The Neural Network algorithm performed the best, achieving the highest accuracy and precision scores, followed closely by XGBoost and SVC. The data shows that continuous authentication using mobile touch dynamics has the potential to be a useful method for enhancing security and reducing the risk of unauthorized access to personal devices. This research also notes the importance of choosing the correct algorithm for a given dataset and use case, as different algorithms may have varying levels of performance depending on the specific task.

Before 2020, the way occupants utilized the built environment had been changing slowly towards scenarios in which occupants have more choice and flexibility in where and how they work. The global COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this phenomenon rapidly through lockdowns and hybrid work arrangements. Many occupants and employers are considering keeping some of these flexibility-based strategies due to their benefits and cost impacts. This paper simulates various scenarios related to the operational technologies and policies of a real-world campus using a district-scale City Energy Analyst (CEA) model that is calibrated with measured energy and occupancy profiles extracted from WiFi data. These scenarios demonstrate the energy impact of ramping building operations up and down more rapidly and effectively to the flex-based work strategies that may solidify. The scenarios show a 4-12% decrease in space cooling demand due to occupant absenteeism if centralized building system operation is in place, but as high as 21-68% if occupancy-driven building controls are implemented. The paper discusses technologies and strategies that are important in this paradigm shift of operations.