In case-based reasoning, the adaptation of a source case in order to solve the target problem is at the same time crucial and difficult to implement. The reason for this difficulty is that, in general, adaptation strongly depends on domain-dependent knowledge. This fact motivates research on adaptation knowledge acquisition (AKA). This paper presents an approach to AKA based on the principles and techniques of knowledge discovery from databases and data-mining. It is implemented in CABAMAKA, a system that explores the variations within the case base to elicit adaptation knowledge. This system has been successfully tested in an application of case-based reasoning to decision support in the domain of breast cancer treatment.

This text analyses the papers accepted for the workshop "Reuse of designs: an interdisciplinary cognitive approach". Several dimensions and questions considered as important (by the authors and/or by us) are addressed: What about the "interdisciplinary cognitive" character of the approaches adopted by the authors? Is design indeed a domain where the use of CBR is particularly suitable? Are there important distinctions between CBR and other approaches? Which types of knowledge -other than cases- is being, or might be, used in CBR systems? With respect to cases: are there different "types" of case and different types of case use? which formats are adopted for their representation? do cases have "components"? how are cases organised in the case memory? Concerning their retrieval: which types of index are used? on which types of relation is retrieval based? how does one retrieve only a selected number of cases, i.e., how does one retrieve only the "best" cases? which processes and strategies are used, by the system and by its user? Finally, some important aspects of CBR system development are shortly discussed: should CBR systems be assistance or autonomous systems? how can case knowledge be "acquired"? what about the empirical evaluation of CBR systems? The conclusion points out some lacking points: not much attention is paid to the user, and few papers have indeed adopted an interdisciplinary cognitive approach.

Adaptation has long been considered as the Achilles' heel of case-based reasoning since it requires some domain-specific knowledge that is difficult to acquire. In this paper, two strategies are combined in order to reduce the knowledge engineering cost induced by the adaptation knowledge (AK) acquisition task: AK is learned from the case base by the means of knowledge discovery techniques, and the AK acquisition sessions are opportunistically triggered, i.e., at problem-solving time.

Design-based learning (DBL) has many affordances for promoting deep and lasting learning of both content and complex skills. However, careful orchestration and scaffolding are usually needed to achieve its full potential. In this paper, we describe our efforts at implementing a software suite to meet the cognitive and meta-cognitive needs of learners engaged in DBL. In Study 1, our software suite gave learners the opportunity to design in simulation, to run experiments to learn the effects of variables, and it scaffolded science explanation construction. Through our analysis of study 1 we identified both cognitive and metacognitive needs that the software did not provide for. To meet these additional requirements, we added an interactive science resource and a case library to the software to provide multi-representational content material, to facilitate exploration, and to invite metacognitive reflection needed to do well at learning through design. Learners recognized what they did not understand, took initiative to explore those science concepts, and applied them in novel ways. We present here our analysis of the kinds of metacognitive help learners need to productively learn from design activities and some ways of providing that help. Our conclusion is that cognitive aid without related metacognitive aid is insufficient in a DBL environment.

As the amount of information available to researchers grows at an increasing rate, it becomes much more difficult to find relevant resources. An approach taken by several authoritative bodies, such as the Association for Computing Machinery and the U.S. National Library of Medicine, is the introduction of a classification scheme. However, even the most modern schemes are not capable of adequately distinguishing one research paper from another, due mainly to their broad generality. This paper describes a methodology for building a much narrower, specialized classification scheme focused on the area of Cased-Based Reasoning in the Health Sciences. It is derived from thorough analysis of the field, but with a framework that can be adapted to other areas. Using a tiered approach to further subdivide systems into more specific classes according to criteria specific to this particular field, this classification scheme affords interdisciplinary search, which is generally left out of generic indexing systems. This paper presents the resulting classification scheme and showcases its usefulness for classifying and tracking the evolution of research.

This paper discusses the state of the art in CBR ontologies from the perspective of one developing an improved system for case-based legal reasoning. The paper proposes three specific roles for a CBR ontology and illustrates them in the context of the intended output of the new system: a legal classroom discussion of how to decide a case featuring hypothetical reasoning and abstract analogies. The paper distills the ontological requirements for modeling the example’s case-based arguments and assesses whether current research can meet those requirements. The concrete example helps to focus on and define goals for improving CBR ontologies.

Following successful special tracks on case-based reasoning at FLAIRS over the past seven years, we invited papers for the Eighth Special Track on CBR at the 22nd International FLAIRS Conference. Case-based reasoning is an AI problem solving and analysis methodology that retrieves and adapts previous experiences to fit new contexts. This forum is intended to gather AI researchers and practitioners with an interest in CBR to present and discuss developments in CBR theory and application. Submission topics included foundations of CBR; methods for CBR (such as representation, indexing, retrieval, adaptation); evaluation methods for CBR systems and integrations; practical applications of CBR; textual CBR; CBR and creativity; CBR and design; distributed CBR; case based maintenance; spatiotemporal CBR; CBR in the health sciences; CBR integrations; case based planning; and CBR and games. The invited speaker for the special track for 2009 is Ashok Goel from the Georgia Institute of Technology, USA.

This article describes the architecture and AI technology behind an XML-based AI framework designed to streamline e-government form processing. The framework performs several crucial assessment and decision support functions, including workflow case assignment, automatic assessment, follow-up action generation, precedent case retrieval, and learning of current practices. To implement these services, several AI techniques were used, including rule-based processing, schema-based reasoning, AI clustering, case-based reasoning, data mining, and machine learning. The primary objective of using AI for e-government form processing is of course to provide faster and higher quality service as well as ensure that all forms are processed fairly and accurately.

This article describes the architecture and AI technology behind an XML-based AI framework designed to streamline e-government form processing. The framework performs several crucial assessment and decision support functions, including workflow case assignment, automatic assessment, follow-up action generation, precedent case retrieval, and learning of current practices. To implement these services, several AI techniques were used, including rule-based processing, schema-based reasoning, AI clustering, case-based reasoning, data mining, and machine learning. The primary objective of using AI for e-government form processing is of course to provide faster and higher quality service as well as ensure that all forms are processed fairly and accurately. With AI, all relevant laws and regulations as well as current practices are guaranteed to be considered and followed. An AI framework has been used to implement an AI module for one of the busiest immigration agencies in the world.

Report on the Seventh International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning