Data-driven interatomic potentials have emerged as a powerful class of surrogate models for {\it ab initio} potential energy surfaces that are able to reliably predict macroscopic properties with experimental accuracy. In generating accurate and transferable potentials the most time-consuming and arguably most important task is generating the training set, which still requires significant expert user input. To accelerate this process, this work presents \text{\it hyperactive learning} (HAL), a framework for formulating an accelerated sampling algorithm specifically for the task of training database generation. The key idea is to start from a physically motivated sampler (e.g., molecular dynamics) and add a biasing term that drives the system towards high uncertainty and thus to unseen training configurations. Building on this framework, general protocols for building training databases for alloys and polymers leveraging the HAL framework will be presented. For alloys, ACE potentials for AlSi10 are created by fitting to a minimal HAL-generated database containing 88 configurations (32 atoms each) with fast evaluation times of <100 microsecond/atom/cpu-core. These potentials are demonstrated to predict the melting temperature with excellent accuracy. For polymers, a HAL database is built using ACE, able to determine the density of a long polyethylene glycol (PEG) polymer formed of 200 monomer units with experimental accuracy by only fitting to small isolated PEG polymers with sizes ranging from 2 to 32.

With recent advances in the fabrication and control of hardware for quantum information processing, the possibilities of merging quantum computing (QC) with machine learning (ML) have received a huge amount of attention within the growing research community. Hereby, reinforcement learning (RL) is the third paradigm besides supervised and unsupervised learning. In this survey article, we provide an overview over so-called quantum reinforcement learning (QRL) algorithms. We understand these as quantum-assisted approaches, that solve a particular task (be they classical or quantum in nature) by employing quantum resources (either in simulation and/or in experiment). In order to keep this contribution as self-contained as possible, we provide the necessary backgrounds before venturing into the QRL literature. We start out with a brief recap of the essentials of the RL paradigm in the fully classical setting in Sec. 2. Further, in Sec. 3 we provide a quick introduction to QC and variational quantum circuits (VQCs). Readers familiar with either of the topics may safely skip these sections. In Sec. 4 we turn our attention to the emerging field of QRL, starting out with a quick overview of the literature.

Chain event graphs (CEGs) are a family of probabilistic graphical models that were first proposed in Smith and Anderson (2008) as an alternative to the family of Bayesian networks (BNs). In particular, CEGs were developed to explicitly accommodate processes exhibiting asymmetries of two types: (1) asymmetric independence structures or context-specific conditional independences where some statistical independences hold for certain values of the conditioning variables but not the others; and (2) asymmetric event spaces which are precisely event spaces that do not admit a product space structure. The latter asymmetry arises due to the presence of structural zeros and structural missing values, often-times by design (Shenvi & Smith, 2020). For example, consider modelling hospitalisations arising from infection caused by a circulating virus, and suppose that one of the two strains (call it strain A) of the virus has no treatment currently available while the other has a choice of two possible treatments. On the one hand, a variable of "Treatment" with state space {Treatment 1, Treatment 2} would be structurally missing and have no sensible value for those infected by strain A of the virus. Whereas on the other hand, if its state space is redefined to be {Treatment 1, Treatment 2, No treatment} then Treatment 1 and Treatment 2 would have structurally zero counts for those infected by strain A, i.e. irrespective of the sample size, there would always be zero individuals who are treated with either Treatment 1 or Treatment 2 among those infected by strain A. Such a process is inherently asymmetric. BNs, being variable-based - i.e. they use variables as the building blocks of their models - are unable to fully describe such asymmetries within their underlying statistical model and graphical structure.

We introduce pyGSL, a Python library that provides efficient implementations of state-of-the-art graph structure learning models along with diverse datasets to evaluate them on. The implementations are written in GPU-friendly ways, allowing one to scale to much larger network tasks. A common interface is introduced for algorithm unrolling methods, unifying implementations of recent state-of-the-art techniques and allowing new methods to be quickly developed by avoiding the need to rebuild the underlying unrolling infrastructure. Implementations of differentiable graph structure learning models are written in PyTorch, allowing us to leverage the rich software ecosystem that exists e.g., around logging, hyperparameter search, and GPU-communication. This also makes it easy to incorporate these models as components in larger gradient based learning systems where differentiable estimates of graph structure may be useful, e.g. in latent graph learning. Diverse datasets and performance metrics allow consistent comparisons across models in this fast growing field. The full code repository can be found on https://github.com/maxwass/pyGSL.

Causal learning has attracted much attention in recent years because causality reveals the essential relationship between things and indicates how the world progresses. However, there are many problems and bottlenecks in traditional causal learning methods, such as high-dimensional unstructured variables, combinatorial optimization problems, unknown intervention, unobserved confounders, selection bias and estimation bias. Deep causal learning, that is, causal learning based on deep neural networks, brings new insights for addressing these problems. While many deep learning-based causal discovery and causal inference methods have been proposed, there is a lack of reviews exploring the internal mechanism of deep learning to improve causal learning. In this article, we comprehensively review how deep learning can contribute to causal learning by addressing conventional challenges from three aspects: representation, discovery, and inference. We point out that deep causal learning is important for the theoretical extension and application expansion of causal science and is also an indispensable part of general artificial intelligence. We conclude the article with a summary of open issues and potential directions for future work.

Transfer Learning is an area of statistics and machine learning research that seeks answers to the following question: how do we build successful learning algorithms when the data available for training our model is qualitatively different from the data we hope the model will perform well on? In this thesis, we focus on a specific area of Transfer Learning called label shift, also known as quantification. In quantification, the aforementioned discrepancy is isolated to a shift in the distribution of the response variable. In such a setting, accurately inferring the response variable's new distribution is both an important estimation task in its own right and a crucial step for ensuring that the learning algorithm can adapt to the new data. We make two contributions to this field. First, we present a new procedure called SELSE which estimates the shift in the response variable's distribution. Second, we prove that SELSE is semiparametric efficient among a large family of quantification algorithms, i.e., SELSE's normalized error has the smallest possible asymptotic variance matrix compared to any other algorithm in that family. This family includes nearly all existing algorithms, including ACC/PACC quantifiers and maximum likelihood based quantifiers such as EMQ and MLLS. Empirical experiments reveal that SELSE is competitive with, and in many cases outperforms, existing state-of-the-art quantification methods, and that this improvement is especially large when the number of test samples is far greater than the number of train samples.

We study the identity testing problem for high-dimensional distributions. Given as input an explicit distribution $\mu$, an $\varepsilon>0$, and access to sampling oracle(s) for a hidden distribution $\pi$, the goal in identity testing is to distinguish whether the two distributions $\mu$ and $\pi$ are identical or are at least $\varepsilon$-far apart. When there is only access to full samples from the hidden distribution $\pi$, it is known that exponentially many samples (in the dimension) may be needed for identity testing, and hence previous works have studied identity testing with additional access to various "conditional" sampling oracles. We consider a significantly weaker conditional sampling oracle, which we call the $\mathsf{Coordinate\ Oracle}$, and provide a computational and statistical characterization of the identity testing problem in this new model. We prove that if an analytic property known as approximate tensorization of entropy holds for an $n$-dimensional visible distribution $\mu$, then there is an efficient identity testing algorithm for any hidden distribution $\pi$ using $\tilde{O}(n/\varepsilon)$ queries to the $\mathsf{Coordinate\ Oracle}$. Approximate tensorization of entropy is a pertinent condition as recent works have established it for a large class of high-dimensional distributions. We also prove a computational phase transition: for a well-studied class of $n$-dimensional distributions, specifically sparse antiferromagnetic Ising models over $\{+1,-1\}^n$, we show that in the regime where approximate tensorization of entropy fails, there is no efficient identity testing algorithm unless $\mathsf{RP}=\mathsf{NP}$. We complement our results with a matching $\Omega(n/\varepsilon)$ statistical lower bound for the sample complexity of identity testing in the $\mathsf{Coordinate\ Oracle}$ model.

The Bayesian approach to solving inverse problems relies on the choice of a prior. This critical ingredient allows the formulation of expert knowledge or physical constraints in a probabilistic fashion and plays an important role for the success of the inference. Recently, Bayesian inverse problems were solved using generative models as highly informative priors. Generative models are a popular tool in machine learning to generate data whose properties closely resemble those of a given database. Typically, the generated distribution of data is embedded in a low-dimensional manifold. For the inverse problem, a generative model is trained on a database that reflects the properties of the sought solution, such as typical structures of the tissue in the human brain in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The inference is carried out in the low-dimensional manifold determined by the generative model which strongly reduces the dimensionality of the inverse problem. However, this proceeding produces a posterior that admits no Lebesgue density in the actual variables and the accuracy reached can strongly depend on the quality of the generative model. For linear Gaussian models we explore an alternative Bayesian inference based on probabilistic generative models which is carried out in the original high-dimensional space. A Laplace approximation is employed to analytically derive the required prior probability density function induced by the generative model. Properties of the resulting inference are investigated. Specifically, we show that derived Bayes estimates are consistent, in contrast to the approach employing the low-dimensional manifold of the generative model. The MNIST data set is used to construct numerical experiments which confirm our theoretical findings.

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has empowered a variety of artificial intelligence fields, including pattern recognition, robotics, recommendation-systems, and gaming. Similarly, graph neural networks (GNN) have also demonstrated their superior performance in supervised learning for graph-structured data. In recent times, the fusion of GNN with DRL for graph-structured environments has attracted a lot of attention. This paper provides a comprehensive review of these hybrid works. These works can be classified into two categories: (1) algorithmic enhancement, where DRL and GNN complement each other for better utility; (2) application-specific enhancement, where DRL and GNN support each other. This fusion effectively addresses various complex problems in engineering and life sciences. Based on the review, we further analyze the applicability and benefits of fusing these two domains, especially in terms of increasing generalizability and reducing computational complexity. Finally, the key challenges in integrating DRL and GNN, and potential future research directions are highlighted, which will be of interest to the broader machine learning community.

Decision making systems trained with real-world data are deployed ubiquitously in our daily life, for example, in regard to credit, education, and medical care. However, those decision systems may demonstrate discrimination against disadvantaged groups due to the biases in the data [16]. In order to mitigate this issue, many have proposed to impose fairness constraints [16, 20] on the decision, such that certain statistical parity properties are achieved. Despite the fact that fair learning has been extensively studied, most of this work is in the static setting without considering the sequential feedback effects of decisions. At the same time, in many scenarios, algorithmic decisions may incur changes in the underlying features or qualification status of individuals, which further feeds back to the decision making process; for example, banks' decision may induce borrowers to react, for example changing their FICO score by closing credit cards.