Goto

Collaborating Authors

 Directed Networks



A Standard Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Links to I

Neural Information Processing Systems

In the standard MLE setting [see, e.g., Murphy, 2012, Ch. 9] we are interested in learning the These two definitions are, however, essentially equivalent. Eq. (15) is a smooth objective that can be optimized with a (stochastic) gradient descent procedure. This section contains the proofs of the results relative to the perturb and map section (Section 3.2) and The proposition now follows from arguments made in Papandreou and Y uille [2011] Its moment generating function has the form E[exp(tX)] = ฮ“(1 ฯ„t). As mentioned in Johnson and Balakrishnan [p. Parts of the proof are inspired by a post on stackexchange Xi'an [2016].Theorem 1.


Supplementary Material S1 Pseudocode Algorithm 1 gives pseudocode for autofocusing a broad class of model-based optimization (MBO)

Neural Information Processing Systems

"E-step" (Steps 1 and 2 in Algorithm 1) and a weighted maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) "M-step" (Step 3; see [ ( t 1) (t 1) One may use these in a number of different ways. The following observation is due to Chebyshev's inequality. One can use Proposition S2.1 to construct a confidence interval on, for example, the expected squared Note that 1) the bound in Proposition S2.1 is CbAS naturally controls the importance weight variance. Design procedures that leverage a trust region can naturally bound the variance of the importance weights. We used CbAS as follows.