Frequently, acquiring training data has an associated cost. We consider the situation where the learner may purchase data during training, subject TO a budget. IN particular, we examine the CASE WHERE each feature label has an associated cost, AND the total cost OF ALL feature labels acquired during training must NOT exceed the budget.This paper compares methods FOR choosing which feature label TO purchase next, given the budget AND the CURRENT belief state OF naive Bayes model parameters.Whereas active learning has traditionally focused ON myopic(greedy) strategies FOR query selection, this paper presents a tractable method FOR incorporating knowledge OF the budget INTO the decision making process, which improves performance.

Bayesian networks are now being used in enormous fields, for example, diagnosis of a system, data mining, clustering and so on. In spite of their wide range of applications, the statistical properties have not yet been clarified, because the models are nonidentifiable and non-regular. In a Bayesian network, the set of its parameter for a smaller model is an analytic set with singularities in the space of large ones. Because of these singularities, the Fisher information matrices are not positive definite. In other words, the mathematical foundation for learning was not constructed. In recent years, however, we have developed a method to analyze non-regular models using algebraic geometry. This method revealed the relation between the models singularities and its statistical properties. In this paper, applying this method to Bayesian networks with latent variables, we clarify the order of the stochastic complexities.Our result claims that the upper bound of those is smaller than the dimension of the parameter space. This means that the Bayesian generalization error is also far smaller than that of regular model, and that Schwarzs model selection criterion BIC needs to be improved for Bayesian networks.

MAP is the problem of finding a most probable instantiation of a set of variables in a Bayesian network given some evidence. Unlike computing posterior probabilities, or MPE (a special case of MAP), the time and space complexity of structural solutions for MAP are not only exponential in the network treewidth, but in a larger parameter known as the "constrained" treewidth. In practice, this means that computing MAP can be orders of magnitude more expensive than computing posterior probabilities or MPE. This paper introduces a new, simple upper bound on the probability of a MAP solution, which admits a tradeoff between the bound quality and the time needed to compute it. The bound is shown to be generally much tighter than those of other methods of comparable complexity. We use this proposed upper bound to develop a branch-and-bound search algorithm for solving MAP exactly. Experimental results demonstrate that the search algorithm is able to solve many problems that are far beyond the reach of any structure-based method for MAP. For example, we show that the proposed algorithm can compute MAP exactly and efficiently for some networks whose constrained treewidth is more than 40.

Precision achieved by stochastic sampling algorithms for Bayesian networks typically deteriorates in face of extremely unlikely evidence. To address this problem, we propose the Evidence Pre-propagation Importance Sampling algorithm (EPIS-BN), an importance sampling algorithm that computes an approximate importance function by the heuristic methods: loopy belief Propagation and e-cutoff. We tested the performance of e-cutoff on three large real Bayesian networks: ANDES, CPCS, and PATHFINDER. We observed that on each of these networks the EPIS-BN algorithm gives us a considerable improvement over the current state of the art algorithm, the AIS-BN algorithm. In addition, it avoids the costly learning stage of the AIS-BN algorithm.

Constraint-based (CB) learning is a formalism for learning a causal network with a database D by performing a series of conditional-independence tests to infer structural information. This paper considers a new test of independence that combines ideas from Bayesian learning, Bayesian network inference, and classical hypothesis testing to produce a more reliable and robust test. The new test can be calculated in the same asymptotic time and space required for the standard tests such as the chi-squared test, but it allows the specification of a prior distribution over parameters and can be used when the database is incomplete. We prove that the test is correct, and we demonstrate empirically that, when used with a CB causal discovery algorithm with noninformative priors, it recovers structural features more reliably and it produces networks with smaller KL-Divergence, especially as the number of nodes increases or the number of records decreases. Another benefit is the dramatic reduction in the probability that a CB algorithm will stall during the search, providing a remedy for an annoying problem plaguing CB learning when the database is small.

The paper continues the study of partitioning based inference of heuristics for search in the context of solving the Most Probable Explanation task in Bayesian Networks. We compare two systematic Branch and Bound search algorithms, BBBT (for which the heuristic information is constructed during search and allows dynamic variable/value ordering) and its predecessor BBMB (for which the heuristic information is pre-compiled), against a number of popular local search algorithms for the MPE problem. We show empirically that, when viewed as approximation schemes, BBBT/BBMB are superior to all of these best known SLS algorithms, especially when the domain sizes increase beyond 2. This is in contrast with the performance of SLS vs. systematic search on CSP/SAT problems, where SLS often significantly outperforms systematic algorithms. As far as we know, BBBT/BBMB are currently the best performing algorithms for solving the MPE task.

We present CLP(BN), a novel approach that aims at expressing Bayesian networks through the constraint logic programming framework. Arguably, an important limitation of traditional Bayesian networks is that they are propositional, and thus cannot represent relations between multiple similar objects in multiple contexts. Several researchers have thus proposed first-order languages to describe such networks. Namely, one very successful example of this approach are the Probabilistic Relational Models (PRMs), that combine Bayesian networks with relational database technology. The key difficulty that we had to address when designing CLP(cal{BN}) is that logic based representations use ground terms to denote objects. With probabilitic data, we need to be able to uniquely represent an object whose value we are not sure about. We use {sl Skolem functions} as unique new symbols that uniquely represent objects with unknown value. The semantics of CLP(cal{BN}) programs then naturally follow from the general framework of constraint logic programming, as applied to a specific domain where we have probabilistic data. This paper introduces and defines CLP(cal{BN}), and it describes an implementation and initial experiments. The paper also shows how CLP(cal{BN}) relates to Probabilistic Relational Models (PRMs), Ngo and Haddawys Probabilistic Logic Programs, AND Kersting AND De Raedts Bayesian Logic Programs.

The paper studies empirically the time-space trade-off between sampling and inference in a sl cutset sampling algorithm. The algorithm samples over a subset of nodes in a Bayesian network and applies exact inference over the rest. Consequently, while the size of the sampling space decreases, requiring less samples for convergence, the time for generating each single sample increases. The w-cutset sampling selects a sampling set such that the induced-width of the network when the sampling set is observed is bounded by w, thus requiring inference whose complexity is exponential in w. In this paper, we investigate performance of w-cutset sampling over a range of w values and measure the accuracy of w-cutset sampling as a function of w. Our experiments demonstrate that the cutset sampling idea is quite powerful showing that an optimal balance between inference and sampling benefits substantially from restricting the cutset size, even at the cost of more complex inference.

We present an application of hierarchical Bayesian estimation to robot map building. The revisiting problem occurs when a robot has to decide whether it is seeing a previously-built portion of a map, or is exploring new territory. This is a difficult decision problem, requiring the probability of being outside of the current known map. To estimate this probability, we model the structure of a "typical" environment as a hidden Markov model that generates sequences of views observed by a robot navigating through the environment. A Dirichlet prior over structural models is learned from previously explored environments. Whenever a robot explores a new environment, the posterior over the model is estimated by Dirichlet hyperparameters. Our approach is implemented and tested in the context of multi-robot map merging, a particularly difficult instance of the revisiting problem. Experiments with robot data show that the technique yields strong improvements over alternative methods.

Inferences in directed acyclic graphs associated with probability sets and probability intervals are NP-hard, even for polytrees. In this paper we focus on such inferences, and propose: 1) a substantial improvement on Tessems A / R algorithm FOR polytrees WITH probability intervals; 2) a new algorithm FOR direction - based local search(IN sets OF probability) that improves ON existing methods; 3) a collection OF branch - AND - bound algorithms that combine the previous techniques.The first two techniques lead TO approximate solutions, WHILE branch - AND - bound procedures can produce either exact OR approximate solutions.We report ON dramatic improvements ON existing techniques FOR inference WITH probability sets AND intervals, IN SOME cases reducing the computational effort BY many orders OF magnitude.