Bayesian models have proven to be one of the most successful classes of tools in machine learning. It stands out as a principled yet conceptually simple pipeline for combining expert knowledge and statistical evidence, modelling with complicated dependency structures and harnessing uncertainty by making probabilistic inferences (Geman & Geman, 1984; Gelman et al., 2014). In the past few decades, the Bayesian approach has been intensively used in modelling speeches (Rabiner, 1989), text documents (Blei et al., 2003), images/videos (Fei-Fei & Perona, 2005), social networks (Airoldi et al., 2009), brain activity (Penny et al., 2011), and is often considered gold standard in many of these application domains. Learning a Bayesisan model typically involves sampling from a posterior distribution, therefore the learning process is inherently randomized. Differential privacy (DP) is a cryptography-inspired notion of privacy (Dwork, 2006; Dwork et al., 2006). It is designed to provide a very strong form of protection of individual user's private information and at the same time allow data analyses to be conducted with proper utility. Any algorithm that preserves differential privacy must be appropriately randomized too. For instance, one can differential-privately release the average salary of Californian males by adding a Laplace noise proportional to the sensitivity of this figure upon small perturbation of the data sample. In this paper, we connect the two seemingly unrelated concepts by showing that under standard assumptions, the intrinsic randomization in the Bayesian learning can be exploited to obtain a degree of differential privacy.

We show that unconverged stochastic gradient descent can be interpreted as a procedure that samples from a nonparametric variational approximate posterior distribution. This distribution is implicitly defined as the transformation of an initial distribution by a sequence of optimization updates. By tracking the change in entropy over this sequence of transformations during optimization, we form a scalable, unbiased estimate of the variational lower bound on the log marginal likelihood. We can use this bound to optimize hyperparameters instead of using cross-validation. This Bayesian interpretation of SGD suggests improved, overfitting-resistant optimization procedures, and gives a theoretical foundation for popular tricks such as early stopping and ensembling. We investigate the properties of this marginal likelihood estimator on neural network models.

We establish bounds on the KL divergence between two multivariate Gaussian distributions in terms of the Hamming distance between the edge sets of the corresponding graphical models. We show that the KL divergence is bounded below by a constant when the graphs differ by at least one edge; this is essentially the tightest possible bound, since classes of graphs exist for which the edge discrepancy increases but the KL divergence remains bounded above by a constant. As a natural corollary to our KL lower bound, we also establish a sample size requirement for correct model selection via maximum likelihood estimation. Our results rigorize the notion that it is essential to estimate the edge structure of a Gaussian graphical model accurately in order to approximate the true distribution to close precision.

A grand challenge in machine learning is the development of computational algorithms that match or outperform humans in perceptual inference tasks that are complicated by nuisance variation. For instance, visual object recognition involves the unknown object position, orientation, and scale in object recognition while speech recognition involves the unknown voice pronunciation, pitch, and speed. Recently, a new breed of deep learning algorithms have emerged for high-nuisance inference tasks that routinely yield pattern recognition systems with near- or super-human capabilities. But a fundamental question remains: Why do they work? Intuitions abound, but a coherent framework for understanding, analyzing, and synthesizing deep learning architectures has remained elusive. We answer this question by developing a new probabilistic framework for deep learning based on the Deep Rendering Model: a generative probabilistic model that explicitly captures latent nuisance variation. By relaxing the generative model to a discriminative one, we can recover two of the current leading deep learning systems, deep convolutional neural networks and random decision forests, providing insights into their successes and shortcomings, as well as a principled route to their improvement.

The general goal here is to choose groups (clusters) of objects so as to maximize homogeneity within clusters and minimize homogeneity across clusters. The clustering problem has been addressed by researchers in many disciplines. A few well-known methods are metric based e.g. K-means (MacQueen et al., 1967), hierarchical clustering (Ward, 1963), clustering based on principal components, spectral clustering (Ng et al., 2002) and so on (Jain and Dubes, 1988; Ozawa, 1985). Traditional clustering methods are complemented by methods based on a probability model where one assumes a data generating distribution (e.g., Gaussian) and infers clustering configurations that maximize certain objective function (Banfield and Raftery, 1993; Fraley and Raftery, 1998, 2002, 2006; MacCullagh and Yang, 2008). A modelbased clustering can be useful in addressing challenges posed by traditional clustering methods. This is because a probability model allows the number of clusters to be treated as a parameter in the model, and can be embedded in a Bayesian framework providing quantification of uncertainty in the number of clusters and clustering configurations.

The Libra Toolkit is a collection of algorithms for learning and inference with discrete probabilistic models, including Bayesian networks, Markov networks, dependency networks, and sum-product networks. Compared to other toolkits, Libra places a greater emphasis on learning the structure of tractable models in which exact inference is efficient. It also includes a variety of algorithms for learning graphical models in which inference is potentially intractable, and for performing exact and approximate inference. Libra is released under a 2-clause BSD license to encourage broad use in academia and industry.

Feature Learning aims to extract relevant information contained in data sets in an automated fashion. It is driving force behind the current deep learning trend, a set of methods that have had widespread empirical success. What is lacking is a theoretical understanding of different feature learning schemes. This work provides a theoretical framework for feature learning and then characterizes when features can be learnt in an unsupervised fashion. We also provide means to judge the quality of features via rate-distortion theory and its generalizations.

We consider reinforcement learning in parameterized Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), where the parameterization may induce correlation across transition probabilities or rewards. Consequently, observing a particular state transition might yield useful information about other, unobserved, parts of the MDP. We present a version of Thompson sampling for parameterized reinforcement learning problems, and derive a frequentist regret bound for priors over general parameter spaces. The result shows that the number of instants where suboptimal actions are chosen scales logarithmically with time, with high probability. It holds for prior distributions that put significant probability near the true model, without any additional, specific closed-form structure such as conjugate or product-form priors. The constant factor in the logarithmic scaling encodes the information complexity of learning the MDP in terms of the Kullback-Leibler geometry of the parameter space.

Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) are likelihood-free Monte Carlo methods. ABC methods use a comparison between simulated data, using different parameters drew from a prior distribution, and observed data. This comparison process is based on computing a distance between the summary statistics from the simulated data and the observed data. For complex models, it is usually difficult to define a methodology for choosing or constructing the summary statistics. Recently, a nonparametric ABC has been proposed, that uses a dissimilarity measure between discrete distributions based on empirical kernel embeddings as an alternative for summary statistics. The nonparametric ABC outperforms other methods including ABC, kernel ABC or synthetic likelihood ABC. However, it assumes that the probability distributions are discrete, and it is not robust when dealing with few observations. In this paper, we propose to apply kernel embeddings using an smoother density estimator or Parzen estimator for comparing the empirical data distributions, and computing the ABC posterior. Synthetic data and real data were used to test the Bayesian inference of our method. We compare our method with respect to state-of-the-art methods, and demonstrate that our method is a robust estimator of the posterior distribution in terms of the number of observations.

Incorporating the side information of text corpus, i.e., authors, time stamps, and emotional tags, into the traditional text mining models has gained significant interests in the area of information retrieval, statistical natural language processing, and machine learning. One branch of these works is the so-called Author Topic Model (ATM), which incorporates the authors's interests as side information into the classical topic model. However, the existing ATM needs to predefine the number of topics, which is difficult and inappropriate in many real-world settings. In this paper, we propose an Infinite Author Topic (IAT) model to resolve this issue. Instead of assigning a discrete probability on fixed number of topics, we use a stochastic process to determine the number of topics from the data itself. To be specific, we extend a gamma-negative binomial process to three levels in order to capture the author-document-keyword hierarchical structure. Furthermore, each document is assigned a mixed gamma process that accounts for the multi-author's contribution towards this document. An efficient Gibbs sampling inference algorithm with each conditional distribution being closed-form is developed for the IAT model. Experiments on several real-world datasets show the capabilities of our IAT model to learn the hidden topics, authors' interests on these topics and the number of topics simultaneously.