Given the black-box nature and complexity of large transformer language models (LM), concerns about generalizability and robustness present ethical implications for domains such as hate speech (HS) detection. Using the content rich Social Bias Frames dataset, containing human-annotated stereotypes, intent, and targeted groups, we develop a three stage analysis to evaluate if LMs faithfully assess hate speech. First, we observe the need for modeling contextually grounded stereotype intents to capture implicit semantic meaning. Next, we design a new task, Stereotype Intent Entailment (SIE), which encourages a model to contextually understand stereotype presence. Finally, through ablation tests and user studies, we find a SIE objective improves content understanding, but challenges remain in modeling implicit intent.

Although robots are becoming more advanced with human-like anthropomorphic features and decision-making abilities to improve collaboration, the active integration of humans into this process remains under-explored. This article presents the first experimental study exploring decision-making interactions between humans and robots with visual cues from robotic eyes, which can dynamically influence human opinion formation. The cues generated by robotic eyes gradually guide human decisions towards alignment with the robot's choices. Both human and robot decision-making processes are modeled as non-linear opinion dynamics with evolving biases. To examine these opinion dynamics under varying biases, we conduct numerical parametric and equilibrium continuation analyses using tuned parameters designed explicitly for the presented human-robot interaction experiment. Furthermore, to facilitate the transition from disagreement to agreement, we introduced a human opinion observation algorithm integrated with the formation of the robot's opinion, where the robot's behavior is controlled based on its formed opinion. The algorithms developed aim to enhance human involvement in consensus building, fostering effective collaboration between humans and robots. Experiments with 51 participants (N = 51) show that human-robot teamwork can be improved by guiding human decisions using robotic cues. Finally, we provide detailed insights on the effects of trust, cognitive load, and participant demographics on decision-making based on user feedback and post-experiment interviews.

As machine learning systems become more widely deployed, including in settings such as resume screening, hiring, lending, and recommendation systems, people have begun to respond to them strategically. Often, this takes the form of "gaming the system" or using an algorithmic system's rules and procedures to manipulate it and achieve desired outcomes. Examples include Uber drivers coordinating the times they log on and off the app to impact its surge pricing algorithm (Möhlmann and Zalmanson, 2017), and Twitter (Burrell et al., 2019) and Facebook (Eslami et al., 2016) users' decisions regarding how to interact with content given the platforms' curation algorithms. Game theoretical modeling and analysis have been used in recent years to formally analyze such strategic responses of humans to algorithms (e.g., Hardt et al. (2016); Milli et al. (2019); Liu et al. (2020); see also Related Work). However, these existing works assume standard models of decision making, where agents are fully rational when responding to algorithms; yet, humans exhibit different forms of cognitive biases in decision making (Kahnemann and Tversky, 1979). Motivated by this, we explore the impacts behavioral biases on agents' strategic responses to algorithms. We begin by proposing an extension of existing models of strategic classification to account for behavioral biases.

Within an explainability framework, the neuropsychology of artificial intelligence focuses on studying synthetic neural cognitive mechanisms, considering them as new subjects of cognitive psychology research. The goal is to make artificial neural networks used in language models understandable by adapting concepts from human cognitive psychology to the interpretation of artificial neural cognition. In this context, the notion of categorization is particularly relevant because it plays a key role as a process of segmentation and reconstruction of informational data by the neural vectors of synthetic cognition. Thus, in this study, the aim is to use the concept of categorization, as understood in human cognitive psychology (particularly in its relation to the notion of similarity), to apply it to the analysis of neural behavior and to infer certain synthetic cognitive processes underlying the observed behaviors.

Large language models generate complex, open-ended outputs: instead of outputting a class label they write summaries, generate dialogue, or produce working code. In order to asses the reliability of these open-ended generation systems, we aim to identify qualitative categories of erroneous behavior, beyond identifying individual errors. To hypothesize and test for such qualitative errors, we draw inspiration from human cognitive biases---systematic patterns of deviation from rational judgement. Specifically, we use cognitive biases as motivation to (i) generate hypotheses for problems that models may have, and (ii) develop experiments that elicit these problems. Using code generation as a case study, we find that OpenAI's Codex errs predictably based on how the input prompt is framed, adjusts outputs towards anchors, and is biased towards outputs that mimic frequent training examples.

Binary human choice feedback is widely used in interactive preference learning for its simplicity, but it provides limited information about preference strength. To overcome this limitation, we leverage human response times, which inversely correlate with preference strength, as complementary information. Our work integrates the EZ-diffusion model, which jointly models human choices and response times, into preference-based linear bandits. We introduce a computationally efficient utility estimator that reformulates the utility estimation problem using both choices and response times as a linear regression problem. Theoretical and empirical comparisons with traditional choice-only estimators reveal that for queries with strong preferences ("easy" queries), choices alone provide limited information, while response times offer valuable complementary information about preference strength. As a result, incorporating response times makes easy queries more useful. We demonstrate this advantage in the fixed-budget best-arm identification problem, with simulations based on three real-world datasets, consistently showing accelerated learning when response times are incorporated.

Purpose: Industrial robots allow manufacturing companies to increase productivity and remain competitive. For robots to be used, they must be accepted by operators on the one hand and bought by decision-makers on the other. The roles involved in such organizational processes have very different perspectives. It is therefore essential for suppliers and robot customers to understand these motives so that robots can successfully be integrated on manufacturing shopfloors. Methodology: We present findings of a qualitative study with operators and decision-makers from two Swiss manufacturing SMEs. Using laddering interviews and means-end analysis, we compare operators' and deciders' relevant elements and how these elements are linked to each other on different abstraction levels. These findings represent drivers and barriers to the acquisition, integration and acceptance of robots in the industry. Findings: We present the differing foci of operators and deciders, and how they can be used by demanders as well as suppliers of robots to achieve robot acceptance and deployment. First, we present a list of relevant attributes, consequences and values that constitute robot acceptance and/or rejection. Second, we provide quantified relevancies for these elements, and how they differ between operators and deciders. And third, we demonstrate how the elements are linked with each other on different abstraction levels, and how these links differ between the two groups.

For public health programs with limited resources, the ability to Public health programs play an essential role in improving the predict how behaviors change over time and in response to interventions health outcomes of individuals and communities, often through education is crucial for deciding when and to whom interventions and subsequent behavioral change. Some health programs should be allocated. Using data from a real-world maternal interact with their intended beneficiaries in a broad and infrequent health program, we demonstrate how a cognitive model based on manner. For example, a campaign about the health risks of smoking Instance-Based Learning (IBL) Theory can augment existing purely may address a general population of smokers through scattered computational approaches. Our findings show that, compared to advertisements in the media [18]. Others rely on repeated direct interactions general time-series forecasters (e.g., LSTMs), IBL models, which with their intended beneficiaries. For example, maternal reflect human decision-making processes, better predict how individuals' health programs that send automated messages about exercise and behaviors change over time (transition-consistency) and nutrition to enrolled expectant mothers [13]. In this case, it is crucial in response to receiving an intervention (intervention-sensitivity).

This paper investigates the computational mechanisms underlying a type of metacognitive monitoring known as detached mindfulness, a particularly effective therapeutic technique within cognitive psychology. While research strongly supports the capacity of detached mindfulness to reduce depression and anxiety, its cognitive and computational underpinnings remain largely unexplained. We employ a computational model of metacognitive skill to articulate the mechanisms through which a detached perception of affect reduces emotional reactivity.

A game developer called Amazing Seasun Games is demonstrating NVIDIA's Avatar Cloud Engine (ACE) technology through its upcoming multiplayer mecha game Mecha BREAK at Gamescom this year. NVIDIA unveiled ACE at Computer 2023, presenting it as a "custom AI model foundry service" that developers can use to make their games more interactive. Specifically, it will allow players to interact with NPCs without the constraints of pre-programmed conversations and will be able to give them appropriate responses. When NVIDIA launched the technology, it showed a player talking to an NPC called Jin at a ramen shop. The player asked how the character was, and Jin was able to respond naturally to tell them about his worries about his city's rising crime rates.