Rank aggregation for complete rankings: The standard Borda method [10] is a well-established greedy heuristic for RAP, which is intuitive and simple to compute for complete rankings. This method has the advantage of being simple and fast, but the obtained solutions may be far from the true optima.

This is Part II of the two-part comprehensive survey devoted to a computing framework most commonly known under the names Hyperdimensional Computing and Vector Symbolic Architectures (HDC/VSA). Both names refer to a family of computational models that use high-dimensional distributed representations and rely on the algebraic properties of their key operations to incorporate the advantages of structured symbolic representations and vector distributed representations. Holographic Reduced Representations is an influential HDC/VSA model that is well-known in the machine learning domain and often used to refer to the whole family. However, for the sake of consistency, we use HDC/VSA to refer to the area. Part I of this survey covered foundational aspects of the area, such as historical context leading to the development of HDC/VSA, key elements of any HDC/VSA model, known HDC/VSA models, and transforming input data of various types into high-dimensional vectors suitable for HDC/VSA. This second part surveys existing applications, the role of HDC/VSA in cognitive computing and architectures, as well as directions for future work. Most of the applications lie within the machine learning/artificial intelligence domain, however we also cover other applications to provide a thorough picture. The survey is written to be useful for both newcomers and practitioners.

This paper present a strong data mining method based on rough set, which can realize feature selection, classification and knowledge representation at the same time. Rough set has good interpretability, and is a popular method for feature selections. But low efficiency and low accuracy are its main drawbacks that limits its application ability. In this paper,corresponding to the accuracy, we first find the ineffectiveness of rough set because of overfitting, especially in processing noise attribute, and propose a robust measurement for an attribute, called relative importance.we proposed the concept of "rough concept tree" for knowledge representation and classification. Experimental results on public benchmark data sets show that the proposed framework achieves higher accurcy than seven popular or the state-of-the-art feature selection methods.

Policy makers rely on models to track disease, inform health recommendations, and allocate resources. Scientists use models to develop, evaluate, and compare theories. Journalists report on new findings in science, which individuals use to make decisions that impact their nutrition, finances, and other aspects of their lives. Faulty statistical models can lead to spurious estimations of disease spread, findings that do not generalize or reproduce, and a misinformed public. The challenge in developing accurate statistical models lies not in a lack of access to mathematical tools, of which there are many (e.g., R [63], Python [52], SPSS [58], and SAS [24]), but in accurately applying them in conjunction with domain theory, data collection, and statistical knowledge [26, 38]. There is a mismatch between the interfaces existing statistical tools provide and the needs of analysts, especially those who have domain knowledge but lack deep statistical expertise (e.g., many researchers). Current tools separate reasoning about domain theory, study design, and statistical models, but analysts need to reason about all three together in order to author accurate models [26].

The human capability to reason about one domain by using knowledge of other domains has been researched for more than 50 years, but models that are formally sound and predict cognitive process are sparse. We propose a formally sound method that models associative reasoning by adapting logical reasoning mechanisms. In particular it is shown that the combination with large commensense knowledge within a single reasoning system demands for an efficient and powerful association technique. This approach is also used for modelling mind-wandering and the Remote Associates Test (RAT) for testing creativity. In a general discussion we show implications of the model for a broad variety of cognitive phenomena including consciousness.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a part of everyday conversation and our lives. It is considered as the new electricity that is revolutionizing the world. AI is heavily invested in both industry and academy. However, there is also a lot of hype in the current AI debate. AI based on so-called deep learning has achieved impressive results in many problems, but its limits are already visible. AI has been under research since the 1940s, and the industry has seen many ups and downs due to over-expectations and related disappointments that have followed. The purpose of this book is to give a realistic picture of AI, its history, its potential and limitations. We believe that AI is a helper, not a ruler of humans. We begin by describing what AI is and how it has evolved over the decades. After fundamentals, we explain the importance of massive data for the current mainstream of artificial intelligence. The most common representations for AI, methods, and machine learning are covered. In addition, the main application areas are introduced. Computer vision has been central to the development of AI. The book provides a general introduction to computer vision, and includes an exposure to the results and applications of our own research. Emotions are central to human intelligence, but little use has been made in AI. We present the basics of emotional intelligence and our own research on the topic. We discuss super-intelligence that transcends human understanding, explaining why such achievement seems impossible on the basis of present knowledge,and how AI could be improved. Finally, a summary is made of the current state of AI and what to do in the future. In the appendix, we look at the development of AI education, especially from the perspective of contents at our own university.

Book 1 Have you ever wondered how a programmer develops games and writes code without having to think too much? Do you want to know what makes a programmer confident about the code they write? Do you want to learn how programmers use algorithms to determine how to structure their programs before they develop it? If you did, this is the book for you. An algorithm is a set of rules or instructions you provide to a system.

Are you interested in furthering your knowledge of algorithms? Do you want to learn how they work for real-world problems? Then you've come to the right place. This guide will walk you through algorithm design before digging into some of the top design techniques. Here's what you will learn: • The steps involved in designing an algorithm • The top algorithm design techniques • The Divide and Conquer algorithm • The Greedy Algorithm • Dynamic Programming • The Branch and Bound Algorithm • The Randomized Algorithm • Recursion and backtracking And everything that goes with them.

Besides entity-centric knowledge, usually organized as Knowledge Graph (KG), events are also an essential kind of knowledge in the world, which trigger the spring up of event-centric knowledge representation form like Event KG (EKG). It plays an increasingly important role in many machine learning and artificial intelligence applications, such as intelligent search, question-answering, recommendation, and text generation. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of EKG from history, ontology, instance, and application views. Specifically, to characterize EKG thoroughly, we focus on its history, definitions, schema induction, acquisition, related representative graphs/systems, and applications. The development processes and trends are studied therein. We further summarize perspective directions to facilitate future research on EKG.

We base our work on the teleosemantic modelling of concepts as abilities implementing the distinct functions of recognition and classification. Accordingly, we model two types of concepts - substance concepts suited for object recognition exploiting visual properties, and classification concepts suited for classification of substance concepts exploiting linguistically grounded properties. The goal in this paper is to demonstrate that object recognition can be construed as classification via visual properties, as distinct from work in mainstream computer vision. Towards that, we present an object recognition process based on Ranganathan's four-phased faceted knowledge organization process, grounded in the teleosemantic distinctions of substance concept and classification concept. We also briefly introduce the ongoing project MultiMedia UKC, whose aim is to build an object recognition resource following our proposed process.