Efficient data management is essential for organizations to ensure that sensitive information such as Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Protected Health Information (PHI) and financial records are systematically identified and protected. Effective classification aids in compliance with regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), while mitigating security risks through real-time threat detection[3] Automated tools improve operational efficiency by streamlining access and eliminating redundancies. Customized classification systems fulfill global compliance requirements, while centralized control mechanisms enhance governance through unified policy enforcement.[4] Strategic data classification is crucial to achieve security, compliance, and operational effectiveness in the digital environment of today. Identifying PII and PHI across various data formats presents considerable challenges, particularly with unstructured data sets. Differences in encoding and file formats (e.g., PDFs, Word documents, databases, CSV, and other text files) and data storage systems complicate the consistent extraction of sensitive information [5]. Moreover, international regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) impose varied compliance mandates, adding further complexity to detection efforts. Customizing detection mechanisms to align with region-specific regulations while ensuring accuracy across different content types is formidable. The necessity for real-time detection and the reduction of false positives amplifies this challenge, necessitating advanced algorithms and comprehensive data management strategies.

If you or someone you know is having thoughts of suicide, please contact the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or 1-800-273-TALK (8255). The parents of a young California tech whistleblower whose 2024 death was ruled a suicide are now suing the City and County of San Francisco, alleging they violated public records laws by refusing to fulfill their requests for information about their son's death. Suchir Balaji, 26, was an employee at OpenAI, the artificial intelligence company behind ChatGPT, at the time of his Nov. 26, 2024, death. A San Francisco County medical examiner concluded the next day he died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound inside his apartment. "In the two-plus months since their son's passing, Petitioners and their counsel have been stymied at every turn as they have sought more information about the cause of and circumstances surrounding Suchir's tragic death. This petition, they hope, is the beginning of the end of that obstruction," the lawsuit states.

Weaknesses: I have some critical remarks: 1.) Weight transport problem. This problem is not solved in the model. In fact the model needs symmetric weights. Feedback alignment will probably not work here, as I assume that the existence of an equilibrium state necessitates symmetric weights. The authors claim that the update rules are local.

Following the author response, we had a long discussion. On the positive side, this is the first algorithm with local update rules that exactly simulates BP (at least asymptotically, given complete convergence at the initialization). On the negative side, all reviewers agreed this algorithm has some reduced plausibility. Specifically, in IL (original PCN) we have to present both input and output, and wait sufficient time until convergence. In contrast, in Z-IL and Fa-Z-IL, we have to first present (only) the input, also wait sufficient time until convergence, and then present the output; In addition, the learning rule becomes more complicated (through the introduction of the Phi function) and we must detect when "the change in error node is caused by feedback input" (which seems to require some global signals). This seems more complicated and less plausible then the original IL.

Accurate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reporting is critical for governments, businesses, and investors. However, adoption remains limited particularly among small and medium enterprises due to high implementation costs, fragmented emission factor databases, and a lack of robust sector classification methods. To address these challenges, we introduce Group Reasoning Emission Estimation Networks (GREEN), an AI-driven carbon accounting framework that standardizes enterprise-level emission estimation, constructs a large-scale benchmark dataset, and leverages a novel reasoning approach with large language models (LLMs). Specifically, we compile textual descriptions for 20,850 companies with validated North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) labels and align these with an economic model of carbon intensity factors. By reframing sector classification as an information retrieval task, we fine-tune Sentence-BERT models using a contrastive learning loss. To overcome the limitations of single-stage models in handling thousands of hierarchical categories, we propose a Group Reasoning method that ensembles LLM classifiers based on the natural NAICS ontology, decomposing the task into multiple sub-classification steps. We theoretically prove that this approach reduces classification uncertainty and computational complexity. Experiments on 1,114 NAICS categories yield state-of-the-art performance (83.68% Top-1, 91.47% Top-10 accuracy), and case studies on 20 companies report a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 45.88%. The project is available at: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Yvnminc/ExioNAICS.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced legal intelligence, but the scarcity of scenario data impedes the progress toward interactive legal scenarios. This paper introduces a Multi-agent Legal Simulation Driver (MASER) to scalably generate synthetic data by simulating interactive legal scenarios. Leveraging real-legal case sources, MASER ensures the consistency of legal attributes between participants and introduces a supervisory mechanism to align participants' characters and behaviors as well as addressing distractions. A Multi-stage Interactive Legal Evaluation (MILE) benchmark is further constructed to evaluate LLMs' performance in dynamic legal scenarios. Extensive experiments confirm the effectiveness of our framework.

In a rapidly globalizing and digital world, content such as book and product reviews created by people from diverse cultures are read and consumed by others from different corners of the world. In this paper, we investigate the extent and patterns of gaps in understandability of book reviews due to the presence of culturally-specific items and elements that might be alien to users from another culture. Our user-study on 57 book reviews from Goodreads reveal that 83\% of the reviews had at least one culture-specific difficult-to-understand element. We also evaluate the efficacy of GPT-4o in identifying such items, given the cultural background of the reader; the results are mixed, implying a significant scope for improvement. Our datasets are available here: https://github.com/sougata-ub/reading_between_lines

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is an advanced technique designed to address the challenges of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content (AIGC). By integrating context retrieval into content generation, RAG provides reliable and up-to-date external knowledge, reduces hallucinations, and ensures relevant context across a wide range of tasks. However, despite RAG's success and potential, recent studies have shown that the RAG paradigm also introduces new risks, including robustness issues, privacy concerns, adversarial attacks, and accountability issues. Addressing these risks is critical for future applications of RAG systems, as they directly impact their trustworthiness. Although various methods have been developed to improve the trustworthiness of RAG methods, there is a lack of a unified perspective and framework for research in this topic. Thus, in this paper, we aim to address this gap by providing a comprehensive roadmap for developing trustworthy RAG systems. We place our discussion around five key perspectives: reliability, privacy, safety, fairness, explainability, and accountability. For each perspective, we present a general framework and taxonomy, offering a structured approach to understanding the current challenges, evaluating existing solutions, and identifying promising future research directions. To encourage broader adoption and innovation, we also highlight the downstream applications where trustworthy RAG systems have a significant impact.

There is a general concern that present developments in artificial intelligence (AI) research will lead to sentient AI systems, and these may pose an existential threat to humanity. But why cannot sentient AI systems benefit humanity instead? This paper endeavours to put this question in a tractable manner. I ask whether a putative AI system will develop an altruistic or a malicious disposition towards our society, or what would be the nature of its agency? Given that AI systems are being developed into formidable problem solvers, we can reasonably expect these systems to preferentially take on conscious aspects of human problem solving. I identify the relevant phenomenal aspects of agency in human problem solving. The functional aspects of conscious agency can be monitored using tools provided by functionalist theories of consciousness. A recent expert report (Butlin et al. 2023) has identified functionalist indicators of agency based on these theories. I show how to use the Integrated Information Theory (IIT) of consciousness, to monitor the phenomenal nature of this agency. If we are able to monitor the agency of AI systems as they develop, then we can dissuade them from becoming a menace to society while encouraging them to be an aid.

Reasoning abilities of LLMs have been a key focus in recent years. One challenging reasoning domain with interesting nuances is legal reasoning, which requires careful application of rules, and precedents while balancing deductive and analogical reasoning, and conflicts between rules. Although there have been a few works on using LLMs for legal reasoning, their focus has been on overall accuracy. In this paper, we dig deeper to do a step-by-step analysis and figure out where they commit errors. We use the college-level Multiple Choice Question-Answering (MCQA) task from the \textit{Civil Procedure} dataset and propose a new error taxonomy derived from initial manual analysis of reasoning chains with respect to several LLMs, including two objective measures: soundness and correctness scores. We then develop an LLM-based automated evaluation framework to identify reasoning errors and evaluate the performance of LLMs. The computation of soundness and correctness on the dataset using the auto-evaluator framework reveals several interesting insights. Furthermore, we show that incorporating the error taxonomy as feedback in popular prompting techniques marginally increases LLM performance. Our work will also serve as an evaluation framework that can be used in detailed error analysis of reasoning chains for logic-intensive complex tasks.