With the increasing adoption of large language models (LLMs) in education, concerns about inherent biases in these models have gained prominence. We evaluate LLMs for bias in the personalized educational setting, specifically focusing on the models' roles as "teachers". We reveal significant biases in how models generate and select educational content tailored to different demographic groups, including race, ethnicity, sex, gender, disability status, income, and national origin. We introduce and apply two bias score metrics--Mean Absolute Bias (MAB) and Maximum Difference Bias (MDB)--to analyze 9 open and closed state-of-the-art LLMs. Our experiments, which utilize over 17,000 educational explanations across multiple difficulty levels and topics, uncover that models perpetuate both typical and inverted harmful stereotypes.

We introduce a goal-oriented conversational AI system enhanced with American Sign Language (ASL) instructions, presenting the first implementation of such a system on a worldwide multimodal conversational AI platform. Accessible through a touch-based interface, our system receives input from users and seamlessly generates ASL instructions by leveraging retrieval methods and cognitively based gloss translations. Central to our design is a sign translation module powered by Large Language Models, alongside a token-based video retrieval system for delivering instructional content from recipes and wikiHow guides. Our development process is deeply rooted in a commitment to community engagement, incorporating insights from the Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing community, as well as experts in cognitive and ASL learning sciences. The effectiveness of our signing instructions is validated by user feedback, achieving ratings on par with those of the system Figure 1: An overview of our multimodal dialogue system, in its non-signing variant. Additionally, our capable of giving signed instructions to Deaf or system demonstrates exceptional performance Hard-of-Hearing users in ASL. We first translate task in retrieval accuracy and text-generation quality, instructions to an intermediate textual representation measured by metrics such as BERTScore.

In the case of a few-shot setting, the model learns from a very limited number of samples (e.g. 10 samples), which can lead to overfitting and mode collapse. So, this paper proposes a Continual Few-shot Teacher-Student technique for the generative adversarial network (CFTS-GAN) that considers both challenges together. Our CFTS-GAN uses an adapter module as a student to learn a new task without affecting the previous knowledge. To make the student model efficient in learning new tasks, the knowledge from a teacher model is distilled to the student. In addition, the Cross-Domain Correspondence (CDC) loss is used by both teacher and student to promote diversity and to avoid mode collapse. Moreover, an effective strategy of freezing the discriminator is also utilized for enhancing performance. Qualitative and quantitative results demonstrate more diverse image synthesis and produce qualitative samples comparatively good to very stronger state-of-the-art models.

Effective management of cardiometabolic conditions requires sustained positive nutrition habits, often hindered by complex and individualized barriers. Direct human management is simply not scalable, while previous attempts aimed at automating nutrition coaching lack the personalization needed to address these diverse challenges. This paper introduces a novel LLM-powered agentic workflow designed to provide personalized nutrition coaching by directly targeting and mitigating patient-specific barriers. Grounded in behavioral science principles, the workflow leverages a comprehensive mapping of nutrition-related barriers to corresponding evidence-based strategies. A specialized LLM agent intentionally probes for and identifies the root cause of a patient's dietary struggles. Subsequently, a separate LLM agent delivers tailored tactics designed to overcome those specific barriers with patient context. We designed and validated our approach through a user study with individuals with cardiometabolic conditions, demonstrating the system's ability to accurately identify barriers and provide personalized guidance. Furthermore, we conducted a large-scale simulation study, grounding on real patient vignettes and expert-validated metrics, to evaluate the system's performance across a wide range of scenarios. Our findings demonstrate the potential of this LLM-powered agentic workflow to improve nutrition coaching by providing personalized, scalable, and behaviorally-informed interventions.

Model-based planners and controllers are commonly used to solve complex manipulation problems as they can efficiently optimize diverse objectives and generalize to long horizon tasks. However, they are limited by the fidelity of their model which oftentimes leads to failures during deployment. To enable a robot to recover from such failures, we propose to use hierarchical reinforcement learning to learn a separate recovery policy. The recovery policy is triggered when a failure is detected based on sensory observations and seeks to take the robot to a state from which it can complete the task using the nominal model-based controllers. Our approach, called RecoveryChaining, uses a hybrid action space, where the model-based controllers are provided as additional \emph{nominal} options which allows the recovery policy to decide how to recover, when to switch to a nominal controller and which controller to switch to even with \emph{sparse rewards}. We evaluate our approach in three multi-step manipulation tasks with sparse rewards, where it learns significantly more robust recovery policies than those learned by baselines. Finally, we successfully transfer recovery policies learned in simulation to a physical robot to demonstrate the feasibility of sim-to-real transfer with our method.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated a remarkable ability to model time series data. These capabilities can be partly explained if LLMs understand basic time series concepts. However, our knowledge of what these models understand about time series data remains relatively limited. To address this gap, we introduce TimeSeriesExam, a configurable and scalable multiple-choice question exam designed to assess LLMs across five core time series understanding categories: pattern recognition, noise understanding, similarity analysis, anomaly detection, and causality analysis. TimeSeriesExam comprises of over 700 questions, procedurally generated using 104 carefully curated templates and iteratively refined to balance difficulty and their ability to discriminate good from bad models. We test 7 state-of-the-art LLMs on the TimeSeriesExam and provide the first comprehensive evaluation of their time series understanding abilities. Our results suggest that closed-source models such as GPT-4 and Gemini understand simple time series concepts significantly better than their open-source counterparts, while all models struggle with complex concepts such as causality analysis. We believe that the ability to programatically generate questions is fundamental to assessing and improving LLM's ability to understand and reason about time series data.

Abstract--Current automatic deep learning (i.e., AutoDL) frameworks rely on training feedback from actual runs, which often hinder their ability to provide quick and clear performance predictions for selecting suitable DL systems. To address this issue, we propose EfficientDL, an innovative deep learning board designed for automatic performance prediction and component recommendation. EfficientDL can quickly and precisely recommend twenty-seven system components and predict the performance of DL models without requiring any training feedback. The magic of no training feedback comes from our proposed comprehensive, multi-dimensional, finegrained system component dataset, which enables us to develop a static performance prediction model and comprehensive optimized component recommendation algorithm (i.e., αβ -BO search), removing the dependency on actually running parameterized models during the traditional optimization search process. The simplicity and power of EfficientDL stem from its compatibility with most DL models. For example, EfficientDL operates seamlessly with mainstream models such as ResNet50, MobileNetV3, EfficientNet-B0, MaxViT-T, Swin-B, and DaViT-T, bringing competitive performance improvements. Besides, experimental results on the CIFAR-10 dataset reveal that EfficientDL outperforms existing AutoML tools in both accuracy and efficiency (approximately 20 times faster along with 1.31% Top-1 accuracy improvement than the cutting-edge methods). Researchers and practitioners often face the challenge of investing substantial time and computational resources to manually select suitable model architectures, tune hyperparameters (such as learning rate, batch size, and number of epochs), and augment data to align with the specific characteristics of their datasets. As a result, achieving optimal performance with deep learning models can be particularly daunting for beginners.

In-context learning (ICL) is a powerful paradigm where large language models (LLMs) benefit from task demonstrations added to the prompt. Yet, selecting optimal demonstrations is not trivial, especially for complex or multi-modal tasks where input and output distributions differ. We hypothesize that forming task-specific representations of the input is key. In this paper, we propose a method to align representations of natural language questions and those of SQL queries in a shared embedding space. Our technique, dubbed MARLO - Metadata-Agnostic Representation Learning for Text-tO-SQL - uses query structure to model querying intent without over-indexing on underlying database metadata (i.e. tables, columns, or domain-specific entities of a database referenced in the question or query). This allows MARLO to select examples that are structurally and semantically relevant for the task rather than examples that are spuriously related to a certain domain or question phrasing. When used to retrieve examples based on question similarity, MARLO shows superior performance compared to generic embedding models (on average +2.9\%pt. in execution accuracy) on the Spider benchmark. It also outperforms the next best method that masks metadata information by +0.8\%pt. in execution accuracy on average, while imposing a significantly lower inference latency.

One significant application is in nutrition science, where ML models can provide dietary recommendations, detect food quality and safety issues during production, and surveil public health and epidemiology. However, the complex and often opaque nature of these models presents challenges in understanding and trusting their predictions. To address these issues, explainability techniques have garnered considerable interest, aiming to make ML models more interpretable and transparent. Explainability can be approached from different perspectives, including local explanations that focus on individual predictions and global explanations that provide insights into the overall behavior of the model. However, there is a growing need for intermediate-level explanations that balance these two extremes, offering contextually relevant insights that are both comprehensive and specific (Sokol and Flach, 2020; Arrieta et al., 2020; Adadi and Berrada, 2018). Cohort explainability, also referred to as subgroup explainability, explains model predictions by analyzing groups of instances with shared characteristics and emerges as a promising solution to this challenge.

This whitepaper offers an overview of the ethical considerations surrounding research into or with large language models (LLMs). As LLMs become more integrated into widely used applications, their societal impact increases, bringing important ethical questions to the forefront. With a growing body of work examining the ethical development, deployment, and use of LLMs, this whitepaper provides a comprehensive and practical guide to best practices, designed to help those in research and in industry to uphold the highest ethical standards in their work.