Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is widely used for adapting large language models (LLMs) to specific domains due to its efficiency and modularity. Meanwhile, vanilla LoRA struggles with task conflicts in multi-task scenarios. Recent works adopt Mixture of Experts (MoE) by treating each LoRA module as an expert, thereby mitigating task interference through multiple specialized LoRA modules. While effective, these methods often isolate knowledge within individual tasks, failing to fully exploit the shared knowledge across related tasks. In this paper, we establish a connection between single LoRA and multi-LoRA MoE, integrating them into a unified framework. We demonstrate that the dynamic routing of multiple LoRAs is functionally equivalent to rank partitioning and block-level activation within a single LoRA. We further empirically demonstrate that finer-grained LoRA partitioning, within the same total and activated parameter constraints, leads to better performance gains across heterogeneous tasks. Building on these findings, we propose Single-ranked Mixture of Experts LoRA (\textbf{SMoRA}), which embeds MoE into LoRA by \textit{treating each rank as an independent expert}. With a \textit{dynamic rank-wise activation} mechanism, SMoRA promotes finer-grained knowledge sharing while mitigating task conflicts. Experiments demonstrate that SMoRA activates fewer parameters yet achieves better performance in multi-task scenarios.

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in text generation and understanding, especially in simulating socio-political and economic patterns, serving as an alternative to traditional surveys. However, their global applicability remains questionable due to unexplored biases across socio-demographic and geographic contexts. This study examines how LLMs perform across diverse populations by analyzing public surveys from Chile and the United States, focusing on predictive accuracy and fairness metrics. The results show performance disparities, with LLM consistently outperforming on U.S. datasets. This bias originates from the U.S.-centric training data, remaining evident after accounting for socio-demographic differences. In the U.S., political identity and race significantly influence prediction accuracy, while in Chile, gender, education, and religious affiliation play more pronounced roles. Our study presents a novel framework for measuring socio-demographic biases in LLMs, offering a path toward ensuring fairer and more equitable model performance across diverse socio-cultural contexts.

Artificial intelligence is reshaping creative domains, yet its co-creative processes, especially in group settings with novice users, remain under explored. To bridge this gap, we conducted a case study in a college-level course where nine undergraduate students were tasked with creating three original music tracks using AI tools over 10 weeks. The study spanned the entire creative journey from ideation to releasing these songs on Spotify. Participants leveraged AI for music and lyric production, cover art, and distribution. Our findings highlight how AI transforms creative workflows: accelerating ideation but compressing the traditional preparation stage, and requiring novices to navigate a challenging idea selection and validation phase. We also identified a new "collaging and refinement" stage, where participants creatively combined diverse AI-generated outputs into cohesive works. Furthermore, AI influenced group social dynamics and role division among human creators. Based on these insights, we propose the Human-AI Co-Creation Stage Model and the Human-AI Agency Model, offering new perspectives on collaborative co-creation with AI.

Model monitoring involves analyzing AI algorithms once they have been deployed and detecting changes in their behaviour. This thesis explores machine learning model monitoring ML before the predictions impact real-world decisions or users. This step is characterized by one particular condition: the absence of labelled data at test time, which makes it challenging, even often impossible, to calculate performance metrics. The thesis is structured around two main themes: (i) AI alignment, measuring if AI models behave in a manner consistent with human values and (ii) performance monitoring, measuring if the models achieve specific accuracy goals or desires. The thesis uses a common methodology that unifies all its sections. It explores feature attribution distributions for both monitoring dimensions. Using these feature attribution explanations, we can exploit their theoretical properties to derive and establish certain guarantees and insights into model monitoring.

The use of chatbots in language learning has evolved significantly since the 1960s, becoming more sophisticated platforms as generative AI emerged. These tools now simulate natural conversations, adapting to individual learners' needs, including those studying Chinese. Our study explores how learners can use specific prompts to engage Large Language Models (LLM) as personalized chatbots, aiming to target their language level based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) and the European Benchmarking Chinese Language (EBCL) project. Focusing on A1, A1+ and A2 levels, we examine the teaching of Chinese, which presents unique challenges due to its logographic writing system. Our goal is to develop prompts that integrate oral and written skills, using high-frequency character lists and controlling oral lexical productions. These tools, powered by generative AI, aim to enhance language practice by crossing lexical and sinographic recurrence. While generative AI shows potential as a personalized tutor, further evaluation is needed to assess its effectiveness. We conducted a systematic series of experiments using ChatGPT models to evaluate their adherence to constraints specified in the prompts. The results indicate that incorporating level A1 and A1+ characters, along with the associated reference list, significantly enhances compliance with the EBCL character set. Properly prompted, LLMs can increase exposure to the target language and offer interactive exchanges to develop language skills.

Emotional support dialogue systems aim to reduce help-seekers' distress and help them overcome challenges. While human values$\unicode{x2013}$core beliefs that shape an individual's priorities$\unicode{x2013}$are increasingly emphasized in contemporary psychological therapy for their role in fostering internal transformation and long-term emotional well-being, their integration into emotional support systems remains underexplored. To bridge this gap, we present a value-driven method for training emotional support dialogue systems designed to reinforce positive values in seekers. Our model learns to identify which values to reinforce at each turn and how to do so, by leveraging online support conversations from Reddit. The model demonstrated superior performance in emotional support capabilities, outperforming various baselines. Notably, it more effectively explored and elicited values from seekers. Expert assessments by therapists highlighted two key strengths of our model: its ability to validate users' challenges and its effectiveness in emphasizing positive aspects of their situations$\unicode{x2013}$both crucial elements of value reinforcement. Our work validates the effectiveness of value reinforcement for emotional support systems and establishes a foundation for future research.

The paper provides novel and solid contributions, both from the theoretical and the empirical standpoints. Its main message is that robustness to adversarial attacks and accuracy are not necessarily contradictory and can be achieved at the same time. To illustrate this claim, the authors observe that many machine learning problems exhibit a natural separation of data which is larger than the size of adversarial attacks. They also demonstrate and prove that smoothness can be used for ensuring both accuracy and robustness. The particular implementation of the smoothness criterion proposed in this paper received some criticism in reviews but this would hopefully motivate authors and other researchers to investigate alternative methods for ensuring smoothness of the decision functions.

A theory paper showing that a reduction from online learning to differentially private PAC learning, e.g., a differentially private PAC learner for concept class H can be used in a black-box fashion to obtain a low regret bound for online learning with 0/1 loss for concept class H. The key contribution here is that this is a computationally efficient reduction, which resolves an open problem of Neel/Roth/Wu and improves on the information theoretic result of Feldman/Xiao. In addition to the strong result, the reviewers point out that the paper contains many interesting observations along the way (e.g., an innovative use of online boosting).

Summary and Contributions: The paper studies a variant of online ranking problem. In the offline settings preferred items belong to different groups, and one need to generate a sequence of items so that qualitatively speaking for each group R_t of items at least k_t elements appear high in the list. More formally they formulate the problem as an online version of the known "Generalized Min-Sum Set Cover" (GMSSC) task: In this problem, given a set U {1,...,n} of n items, in each step 1. The learner selects a permutation \pi_t items in U 2. The adversary selects a request R_t \subset U with demand k_t . The goal is to minimize the multiplicative regret, that is the ratio of the total cost to the cost of selecting a fixed optimal permutation \pi* in all steps.

The reviewers have some concerns that the rebuttal didn't fully address but they all like the paper and agree that it should be accepted at NeurIPS.