If you regularly work with open-source code or produce software for a large organization, you are already familiar with many of the challenges posed by collaborative programming at scale. Some of the most vexing of these tend to surface as a consequence of the many independent alterations inevitably made to code, which, unsurprisingly, can lead to updates that do not synchronize. Difficult merges are nothing new, of course, but the scale of the problem has gotten much worse. This is what led a group of researchers at Microsoft Research (MSR) to take on the task of complicated merges as a grand program-repair challenge--one they believed might be addressed at least in part by machine learning (ML). To understand the thinking that led to this effort and then follow where that led, ACM Queue asked Erik Meijer and Terry Coatta to speak with three of the leading figures in the MSR research effort, called DeepMerge.a Meijer was long a member of MSR, but at the time of this discussion was director of engineering at Meta. Coatta is the chief technology officer of Marine Learning Systems. Shuvendu Lahiri and Christian Bird, two of the researchers who helped drive this effort, represent MSR, as does Alexey Svyatkovskiy, who was with Microsoft DevDiv (Development Division) at the time. Terry Coatta: What inspired you to focus on merge conflicts in the first place? And what made you think you'd be able to gain some advantage by applying AI techniques? Christian Bird: Back in the winter of 2020, some of us started talking about ways in which we might be able to use machine learning to improve the state of software engineering.

Charlotte Bunne, head of EPFL's Artificial Intelligence in Molecular Medicine Group, is developing AI algorithms to better understand the incredibly complex and high-dimensional data that represent the hundreds of tissue layers and protein markers in an individual cell. EPFL magazine Dimensions spoke to Charlotte Bunne about her work at the cutting-edge of AI in medicine and biology. Could you describe the focus of your research? We are developing diagnostic tools for clinics that are driven by AI technologies. This includes forecasting the best treatment that a patient should receive, trying to understand the state of disease that a patient is in, and deciphering important biomarkers or potential drug targets that we should investigate further.

This book provides a broad overview of Natural Language Generation (NLG), including technology, user requirements, evaluation, and real-world applications. The focus is on concepts and insights which hopefully will remain relevant for many years, not on the latest LLM innovations. It draws on decades of work by the author and others on NLG. The book has the following chapters: Introduction to NLG; Rule-Based NLG; Machine Learning and Neural NLG; Requirements; Evaluation; Safety, Maintenance, and Testing; and Applications. All chapters include examples and anecdotes from the author's personal experiences, and end with a Further Reading section. The book should be especially useful to people working on applied NLG, including NLG researchers, people in other fields who want to use NLG, and commercial developers. It will not however be useful to people who want to understand the latest LLM technology. There is a companion site with more information at https://ehudreiter.com/book/

This study evaluates Large Language Models' (LLMs) ability to simulate non-native-like English use observed in human second language (L2) learners interfered with by their native first language (L1). In dialogue-based interviews, we prompt LLMs to mimic L2 English learners with specific L1s (e.g., Japanese, Thai, Urdu) across seven languages, comparing their outputs to real L2 learner data. Our analysis examines L1-driven linguistic biases, such as reference word usage and avoidance behaviors, using information-theoretic and distributional density measures. Results show that modern LLMs (e.g., Qwen2.5, LLAMA3.3, DeepseekV3, GPT-4o) replicate L1-dependent patterns observed in human L2 data, with distinct influences from various languages (e.g., Japanese, Korean, and Mandarin significantly affect tense agreement, and Urdu influences noun-verb collocations). Our results reveal the potential of LLMs for L2 dialogue generation and evaluation for future educational applications.

Infrared and visible image fusion (IVIF) is increasingly applied in critical fields such as video surveillance and autonomous driving systems. Significant progress has been made in deep learning-based fusion methods. However, these models frequently encounter out-of-distribution (OOD) scenes in real-world applications, which severely impact their performance and reliability. Therefore, addressing the challenge of OOD data is crucial for the safe deployment of these models in open-world environments. Unlike existing research, our focus is on the challenges posed by OOD data in real-world applications and on enhancing the robustness and generalization of models. In this paper, we propose an infrared-visible fusion framework based on Multi-View Augmentation. For external data augmentation, Top-k Selective Vision Alignment is employed to mitigate distribution shifts between datasets by performing RGB-wise transformations on visible images. This strategy effectively introduces augmented samples, enhancing the adaptability of the model to complex real-world scenarios. Additionally, for internal data augmentation, self-supervised learning is established using Weak-Aggressive Augmentation. This enables the model to learn more robust and general feature representations during the fusion process, thereby improving robustness and generalization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed method exhibits superior performance and robustness across various conditions and environments. Our approach significantly enhances the reliability and stability of IVIF tasks in practical applications.

Instruction tuning in low-resource languages remains underexplored due to limited text data, particularly in government and cultural domains. To address this, we introduce and open-source a large-scale (10,600 samples) instruction-following (IFT) dataset, covering key institutional and cultural knowledge relevant to Kazakhstan. Our dataset enhances LLMs' understanding of procedural, legal, and structural governance topics. We employ LLM-assisted data generation, comparing open-weight and closed-weight models for dataset construction, and select GPT-4o as the backbone. Each entity of our dataset undergoes full manual verification to ensure high quality. We also show that fine-tuning Qwen, Falcon, and Gemma on our dataset leads to consistent performance improvements in both multiple-choice and generative tasks, demonstrating the potential of LLM-assisted instruction tuning for low-resource languages.

Language exhibits a fractal structure in its information-theoretic complexity (i.e. bits per token), with self-similarity across scales and long-range dependence (LRD). In this work, we investigate whether large language models (LLMs) can replicate such fractal characteristics and identify conditions-such as temperature setting and prompting method-under which they may fail. Moreover, we find that the fractal parameters observed in natural language are contained within a narrow range, whereas those of LLMs' output vary widely, suggesting that fractal parameters might prove helpful in detecting a non-trivial portion of LLM-generated texts. Notably, these findings, and many others reported in this work, are robust to the choice of the architecture; e.g. Gemini 1.0 Pro, Mistral-7B and Gemma-2B. We also release a dataset comprising of over 240,000 articles generated by various LLMs (both pretrained and instruction-tuned) with different decoding temperatures and prompting methods, along with their corresponding human-generated texts. We hope that this work highlights the complex interplay between fractal properties, prompting, and statistical mimicry in LLMs, offering insights for generating, evaluating and detecting synthetic texts.

Now our intrepid China reporter, Caiwei Chen, has identified a new trend unfolding within China's tech scene: Companies that were dominant in electric vehicles are betting big on translating that success into developing humanoid robots. I spoke with her about what she found out and what it might mean for Trump's policies and the rest of the globe. James: Before we talk about robots, let's talk about DeepSeek. The frenzy for the AI model peaked a couple of weeks ago. What are you hearing from other Chinese AI companies?

Abstract--Large language models (LLMs) face the challenge of hallucinations - outputs that seem coherent but are actually incorrect. A particularly damaging type is fact-conflicting hallucination (FCH), where generated content contradicts established facts. Addressing FCH presents three main challenges: 1) Automatically constructing and maintaining large-scale benchmark datasets is difficult and resource-intensive; 2) Generating complex and efficient test cases that the LLM has not been trained on - especially those involving intricate temporal features - is challenging, yet crucial for eliciting hallucinations; and 3) Validating the reasoning behind LLM outputs is inherently difficult, particularly with complex logical relationships, as it requires transparency in the model's decision-making process. LLMs are tested using these cases through template-based prompts, which require them to generate both answers and reasoning steps. T o validate the reasoning, we propose two semantic-aware oracles that compare the semantic structure of LLM outputs to the ground truths. Key insights reveal that LLMs struggle with out-of-distribution knowledge and logical reasoning. These findings highlight the importance of continued efforts to detect and mitigate hallucinations in LLMs. Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized language processing, demonstrating impressive text generation and comprehension capabilities with diverse applications. However, despite their growing use, LLMs face significant security and privacy challenges [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], which affect their overall effectiveness and reliability . A critical issue is the phenomenon of hallucination, where LLMs generate outputs that are coherent but factually incorrect or irrelevant. This tendency to produce misleading information compromises the safety and usability of LLM-based systems. This paper focuses on fact-conflicting hallucina tion (FCH), the most prominent form of hallucination in LLMs. FCH occurs when LLMs generate content that directly contradicts established facts. For instance, as illustrated in Figure 1, an LLM incorrectly asserts that " Haruki Murakami won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 2016 ", whereas the fact is that "Haruki Murakami has not won the Nobel Prize, though he has received numerous other literary awards ". Such inaccuracies can significantly lead to user confusion and undermine the trust and reliability that are crucial for LLM applications. N. Li, K. Wang, and H. Wang are with Huazhong University of Science and T echnology, China. Song is with the National University of Singapore, Singapore. Li is with the University of New South Wales, Australia.

The reference to assumptions in how practitioners use or interact with machine learning (ML) systems is ubiquitous in HCI and responsible ML discourse. However, what remains unclear from prior works is the conceptualization of assumptions and how practitioners identify and handle assumptions throughout their workflows. This leads to confusion about what assumptions are and what needs to be done with them. We use the concept of an argument from Informal Logic, a branch of Philosophy, to offer a new perspective to understand and explicate the confusions surrounding assumptions. Through semi-structured interviews with 22 ML practitioners, we find what contributes most to these confusions is how independently assumptions are constructed, how reactively and reflectively they are handled, and how nebulously they are recorded. Our study brings the peripheral discussion of assumptions in ML to the center and presents recommendations for practitioners to better think about and work with assumptions.