Probabilistic Roadmaps (PRM) are a commonly used class of algorithms for robot navigation tasks where obstacles are present in the environment. We examine the situation where the obstacle positions are not precisely known. A subset of the edges in the PRM graph may possibly intersect the obstacles, and as the robot traverses the graph it can make noisy observations of these uncertain edges to determine if it can traverse them or not. The problem is to traverse the graph from an initial vertex to a goal without taking a blocked edge, and to do this optimally the robot needs to consider the observations it can make as well as the structure of the graph. In this paper we show how this problem can be represented as a POMDP. We show that while too large to be solved with exact methods, approximate point based methods can provide a good quality solution. While feasible for smaller examples, this approach isn't scalable. By exploiting the structure in the belief space, we can construct an approximate belief-space MDP that can be solved efficiently using recent techniques in MDP planning. We then demonstrate that this gives near optimal results in most cases while achieving an order of magnitude speed-up in policy generation time.

Solving real-world problems using symbolic planning often requires a simplified formulation of the original problem, since certain subproblems cannot be represented at all or only in a way leading to inefficiency. For example, manipulation planning may appear as a subproblem in a robotic planning context or a packing problem can be part of a logistics task. In this paper we propose an extension of PDDL for specifying semantic attachments. This allows the evaluation of grounded predicates as well as the change of fluents by externally specified functions. Furthermore, we describe a general schema of integrating semantic attachments into a forward-chaining planner and report on our experience of adding this extension to the planners FF and Temporal Fast Downward. Finally, we present some preliminary experiments using semantic attachments.

In this paper we realize the synthesis of continuous coordinations By envisaging standards to publish and access services over based on the conceptual framework of (Pistore, the Web, the Service-Oriented Computing (SOC) paradigm Traverso, and Bertoli 2005), which recasts the composition promises a novel degree of interoperability between distributed problem in terms of planning; namely, we act at its core applications that realize business processes. One by adopting a very simple, yet expressive requirements language, cornerstone of SOC stands in the provision of novel and and devising a novel planning algorithm. In particular, more complex business logics by the coordination of existing the requirement language expresses coordination constraints services. Due to the complexity of manually realizing that are transformed into preference-ordered maintenability such coordinations, automatedly supporting the synthesis goals, and the algorithm deals with such goals in of service orchestrations is crucial to the actual enactment the presence of exogenous events (which encode independent of SOC. This problem is extremely hard since, asynchronous evolutions of services).

This paper is concerned with local search methods to solve job shop scheduling problems with uncertain durations modelled as fuzzy numbers. Based on a neighbourhood structure from the literature, a reduced set of moves and the consequent structure are defined. Theoretical results show that the proposed neighbourhood contains all the improving solutions from the original neighbourhood and provide a sufficient condition for optimality. Additionally, a makespan lower bound is proposed which can be used to discard neighbours. Experimental results illustrate the good performance of both proposals, which considerably reduce the computational load of the local search, as well as a synergy effect when they are simultaneously used.

In this paper a planning framework based on Ant Colony Optimization techniques is presented. It is well known that finding optimal solutions to planning problems is a very hard computational problem. Stochastic methods do not guarantee either optimality or completeness, but it has been proved that in many applications they are able to find very good, often optimal, solutions. We propose several approaches based both on backward and forward search over the state space, using several heuristics and testing different pheromone models in order to solve sequential optimization planning problems.

This paper proposes an iterative improvement approach for solving the Resource Constraint Project Scheduling Problem with Time-Windows (RCPSP/max), a well-known and challenging NP-hard scheduling problem. The algorithm is based on Iterative Flattening Search (IFS), an effective heuristic strategy for solving multi-capacity optimization scheduling problems. Given an initial solution, IFS iteratively performs two-steps: a relaxation-step , that randomly removes a subset of solution constraints and a solving-step , that incrementally recomputes a new solution. At the end, the best solution found is returned. The main contribution of this paper is the extension to RCPSP/max of the IFS optimization procedures developed for solving scheduling problems without time-windows. An experimental evaluation performed on medium-large size and web-available benchmark sets confirms the effectiveness of the proposed procedures. In particular, we have improved the average quality w.r.t. the current bests, while discovering three new optimal solutions, thus demonstrating the general efficacy of IFS.

Current state-of-the-art planners solve problems, easy and hard alike, by search, expanding hundreds or thousands of nodes. Yet, given the ability of people to solve easy problems and to explain their solutions, it seems that an essential inferential component may be missing. The reasons expressed by people for selecting  actions appear to be related to causal chains: sequences of causal links a i → p i + 1 , i = 0, ..., n – 1, such that a 0 is applicable in the current state, p i is a precondition of action a i , and p n is a goal. Some of these causal chains or paths appear to be good, some bad, others appear to be impossible. In this work, we focus on such paths and develop three techniques for performing inference over them  from which a  path-based planner is obtained. We define the conditions under which a path is consistent, provide an heuristic estimate of the cost of achieving the goal along a consistent path, and introduce a planning algorithm that uses paths as decomposition backbones. The resulting planner, called C3, is not complete and does not perform as well as recent planners that carry extensive but extremely efficient searches such as LAMA, but is competitive with FF and in particular, with FF running in EHC mode which yields very focused but incomplete searches, and thus provides, a more apt comparison. Moreover, many domains are solved backtrack-free, with no search at all, suggesting that planning with paths may be a meaningful idea both cognitively and computationally.

Recently, Helmert and Geffner proposed the context-enhanced additive heuristic, where fact costs are evaluated relative to context states that arise from achieving first a pivot condition of each operator. As Helmert and Geffner pointed out, the method can be generalized to consider contexts arising from arbitrary precedence constraints over operator conditions instead. Herein, we provide such a generalization. We extend Helmert and Geffner's equations, and discuss a number of design choices that arise. Drawing on previous work on goal orderings, we design a family of methods for automatically generating precedence constraints. We run large-scale experiments, showing that the technique can help significantly, depending on the choice of precedence constraints. We shed some light on this by profiling the behavior of all possible precedence constraints, using a sampling technique.

Systems subject to (continuous) physical effects and controlled by (discrete) digital equipments, are today very common. Thus, many realistic domains where planning is required are represented by hybrid systems , i.e., systems containing both discrete and continuous values, with possibly a nonlinear continuous dynamics. The PDDL+ language allows one to model these domains, however the current tools can generally handle only planning problems on (possibly hybrid) systems with linear dynamics. Therefore, universal planning applied to hybrid systems and, in general, to non-linear systems is completely out of scope for such tools. In this paper, we propose the use of explicit model checking-based techniques to solve universal planning problems on such hardly-approachable domains.

Current heuristic estimators for classical domain-independent planning are usually based on one of four ideas: delete relaxations , critical paths , abstractions , and, most recently, landmarks . Previously, these different ideas for deriving heuristic functions were largely unconnected. We prove that admissible heuristics based on these ideas are in fact very closely related. Exploiting this relationship, we introduce a new admissible heuristic called the landmark cut heuristic , which compares favourably with the state of the art in terms of heuristic accuracy and overall performance.