Formal logic has long been applied to natural language reasoning, but this approach can sometimes lead to conclusions that, while logically entailed, are factually inconsistent with the premises or are not typically inferred by humans. This study introduces the concept of "rulebreakers", which refers to instances where logical entailment diverges from factually acceptable inference. We present RULEBREAKERS, a novel dataset for evaluating Large Language Models' (LLMs) ability to distinguish between rulebreakers and non-rulebreakers. Focusing on modus tollens and disjunctive syllogism, we assess six state-of-the-art LLMs using RULEBREAKERS, measuring their performance in terms of token-level exact accuracy and model confidence. Our findings reveal that while most models perform poorly to moderately in recognizing rulebreakers, they demonstrate a latent ability to distinguish rulebreakers when assessed by their confidence levels. Further analysis suggests that the failure to recognize rulebreakers is potentially associated with the models' world knowledge and their attention distribution patterns. This research highlights the limitation of LLMs' reasoning capabilities, and contributes to the ongoing discussion on reasoning in LLMs.

Many attempts have been made in multilingual NLP to ensure that pre-trained language models, such as mBERT or GPT2 get better and become applicable to low-resource languages. To achieve multilingualism for pre-trained language models (PLMs), we need techniques to create word embeddings that capture the linguistic characteristics of any language. Tokenization is one such technique because it allows for the words to be split based on characters or subwords, creating word embeddings that best represent the structure of the language. Creating such word embeddings is essential to applying PLMs to other languages where the model was not trained, enabling multilingual NLP. However, most PLMs use generic tokenization methods like BPE, wordpiece, or unigram which may not suit specific languages. We hypothesize that tokenization based on syllables within the input text, which we call syllable tokenization, should facilitate the development of syllable-aware language models. The syllable-aware language models make it possible to apply PLMs to languages that are rich in syllables, for instance, Swahili. Previous works introduced subword tokenization. Our work extends such efforts. Notably, we propose a syllable tokenizer and adopt an experiment-centric approach to validate the proposed tokenizer based on the Swahili language. We conducted text-generation experiments with GPT2 to evaluate the effectiveness of the syllable tokenizer. Our results show that the proposed syllable tokenizer generates syllable embeddings that effectively represent the Swahili language.

Despite their impressive performance, large language models (LMs) still struggle with reliably generating complex output structures when not finetuned to follow the required output format exactly. To address this issue, grammar-constrained decoding (GCD) can be used to control the generation of LMs, guaranteeing that the output follows a given structure. Most existing GCD methods are, however, limited to specific tasks, such as parsing or code generation. In this work, we demonstrate that formal grammars can describe the output space for a much wider range of tasks and argue that GCD can serve as a unified framework for structured NLP tasks in general. For increased flexibility, we introduce input-dependent grammars, which allow the grammar to depend on the input and thus enable the generation of different output structures for different inputs. We then empirically demonstrate the power and flexibility of GCD-enhanced LMs on (1) information extraction, (2) entity disambiguation, and (3) constituency parsing. Our results indicate that grammar-constrained LMs substantially outperform unconstrained LMs or even beat task-specific finetuned models. Grammar constraints thus hold great promise for harnessing off-the-shelf LMs for a wide range of structured NLP tasks, especially where training data is scarce or finetuning is expensive. Code and data: https://github.com/epfl-dlab/GCD.

The ability to conduct retrospective analyses of attacks on human rights defenders over time and by location is important for humanitarian organizations to better understand historical or ongoing human rights violations and thus better manage the global impact of such events. We hypothesize that NLP can support such efforts by quickly processing large collections of news articles to detect and summarize the characteristics of attacks on human rights defenders. To that end, we propose a new dataset for detecting Attacks on Human Rights Defenders (HRDsAttack) consisting of crowdsourced annotations on 500 online news articles. The annotations include fine-grained information about the type and location of the attacks, as well as information about the victim(s). We demonstrate the usefulness of the dataset by using it to train and evaluate baseline models on several sub-tasks to predict the annotated characteristics.

Malaria continues to be a major public health problem on the African continent, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. Nonetheless, efforts are ongoing, and significant progress has been made. In Burundi, malaria is among the main public health concerns. In the literature, there are limited prediction models for Burundi. We know that such tools are much needed for interventions design. In our study, we built machine-learning based models to estimates malaria cases in Burundi. The forecast of malaria cases was carried out at province level and national scale as well. Long short term memory (LSTM) model, a type of deep learning model has been used to achieve best results using climate-change related factors such as temperature, rainfal, and relative humidity, together with malaria historical data and human population. With this model, the results showed that at country level different tuning of parameters can be used in order to determine the minimum and maximum expected malaria cases. The univariate version of that model (LSTM) which learns from previous dynamics of malaria cases give more precise estimates at province-level, but both models have same trends overall at provnce-level and country-level