As the importance of comprehensive evaluation in workshop courses increases, there is a growing demand for efficient and fair assessment methods that reduce the workload for faculty members. This paper presents an evaluation conducted with Large Language Models (LLMs) using actual student essays in three scenarios: 1) without providing guidance such as rubrics, 2) with pre-specified rubrics, and 3) through pairwise comparison of essays. Quantitative analysis of the results revealed a strong correlation between LLM and faculty member assessments in the pairwise comparison scenario with pre-specified rubrics, although concerns about the quality and stability of evaluations remained. Therefore, we conducted a qualitative analysis of LLM assessment comments, showing that: 1) LLMs can match the assessment capabilities of faculty members, 2) variations in LLM assessments should be interpreted as diversity rather than confusion, and 3) assessments by humans and LLMs can differ and complement each other. In conclusion, this paper suggests that LLMs should not be seen merely as assistants to faculty members but as partners in evaluation committees and outlines directions for further research.

The research project aims to apply an integrated approach to natural language processing NLP to satisfaction surveys. It will focus on understanding and extracting relevant information from survey responses, analyzing feelings, and identifying recurring word patterns. NLP techniques will be used to determine emotional polarity, classify responses into positive, negative, or neutral categories, and use opinion mining to highlight participants opinions. This approach will help identify the most relevant aspects for participants and understand their opinions in relation to those specific aspects. A key component of the research project will be the analysis of word patterns in satisfaction survey responses using NPL. This analysis will provide a deeper understanding of feelings, opinions, and themes and trends present in respondents responses. The results obtained from this approach can be used to identify areas for improvement, understand respondents preferences, and make strategic decisions based on analysis to improve respondent satisfaction.