To create a passage representation, the passage title and text are concatenated ([CLS]title [SEP]passage [SEP]), following common practice (Karpukhin et al., 2020). We retrieve top 10 passages and use them as input to mGEN. We differentiate those paragraphs from the question using special tokens (

vs. He graduated with a B.S. degree in Biology in 1957. As in the case of machine translation, we found that the language code does not need to be specified during inference as our model learns the question language automatically. Yet, we found that training with language codes is particularly useful to augment training data for Ltarget without any question data in Ltarget.

The dataset and the baseline code will be made publicly available in a dedicated GitHub repository upon acceptance. License TempEL is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CCBY-SA 4.0).1 Maintenance The maintenance and extension to further temporal snapshots of TempEL will be carried out by the authors of the paper. Additionally, we will make the code public to create potential new variations and extensions of TempEL using a number of hyperparameters (see Sections A.4 and A.5 for further details). A.2 Datasheet for TempEL In this section we provide a more detailed documentation of the dataset with the intended uses. We base ourselves on the datasheet proposed by [1]. A.2.1 Motivation For what purpose was the dataset created? The TempEL dataset was created to evaluate how the temporal change of anchor mentions and that of target Knowledge Base (KB; i.e., modification or creation of new entities) affects the entity linking (EL) task. This contrasts with the currently existing datasets [9, 7, 8, 6], which are associated with a single version of the target KB such as the Wikipedia 2010 for the widely adopted CoNLL-AIDA[2] dataset. We expect that TempEL will encourage research in devising new models and architectures that are robust to temporal changes both in mentions as well as in the target KBs. Who created the dataset and on behalf of which entity?

In order to convert the dataset to NER format we suggest tokenizing Tweet text and utilizing the character offsets to identify mention tokens. E.g. just setting up my twttrwith offsets 19and 24, and DBpedia category as Organization, can be converted to the NERBIO format as follows: tokens, starts, ends = tokenize_with_offsets("just setting up my twttr")and then assigning Olabels to all tokens outside the phrase start and end offsets and B-ORG and I-ORG label to all tokens within the phrase offsets. This approach works as long as the tokenizer returned offsets correspond to the offset of the phrase in the original text, i.e. tokenization is non-destructive. See example code in listing 1. A system span must match a gold span exactly to be counted as correct.

In this paper we present a practical solution with performance guarantees to the problem of dimensionality reduction for very large scale sparse matrices. We show applications of our approach to computing the Principle Component Analysis (PCA) of any n dmatrix, using one pass over the stream of its rows. Our solution uses coresets: a scaled subset of the n rows that approximates their sum of squared distances to every k-dimensional affine subspace. An open theoretical problem has been to compute such a coreset that is independent of both n and d. An open practical problem has been to compute a non-trivial approximation to the PCA of very large but sparse databases such as the Wikipedia document-term matrix in a reasonable time. We answer both of these questions affirmatively. Our main technical result is a new framework for deterministic coreset constructions based on a reduction to the problem of counting items in a stream.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Web-scale visual entity recognition, the task of associating images with their corresponding entities within vast knowledge bases like Wikipedia, presents significant challenges due to the lack of clean, large-scale training data. In this paper, we propose a novel methodology to curate such a dataset, leveraging a multimodal large language model (LLM) for label verification, metadata generation, and rationale explanation. Instead of relying on the multimodal LLM to directly annotate data, which we found to be suboptimal, we prompt it to reason about potential candidate entity labels by accessing additional contextually relevant information (such as Wikipedia), resulting in more accurate annotations. We further use the multimodal LLM to enrich the dataset by generating question-answer pairs and a grounded fine-grained textual description (referred to as rationale) that explains the connection between images and their assigned entities. Experiments demonstrate that models trained on this automatically curated data achieve state-of-the-art performance on web-scale visual entity recognition tasks (e.g.

This month we tackle the topic of young people and what AI tools mean for their future. Joining the conversation this time are: Sanmay Das (Virginia Tech), Tom Dietterich (Oregon State University), Sabine Hauert (University of Bristol), Michael Littman (Brown University), and Ella Scallan (AIhub). As AI tools have become ubiquitous, we've seen growing concern and increasing coverage about how the use of such tools from a formative age might affect children. What do you think the impact will be and what skills might young people need to navigate this AI world? I met up with a bunch of high school friends when I was last in Switzerland and they were all wondering what their kids should study. They were wondering if they should do social science, seeing as AI tools have become adept at many tasks, such as coding, writing, art, etc. I think that we need social sciences, but that we also need people who know the technology and who can continue developing it. I say they should continue doing whatever they're interested in and those jobs will evolve and they'll look different, but there will still be a whole wealth of different types of jobs.

Cross-modal (image-to-text and text-to-image) retrieval is an established task used in evaluation benchmarks to testthe performance of vision-language models (VLMs).