A representation learning method is considered stable if it consistently generates similar representation of the given data across multiple runs. Word Embedding Methods (WEMs) are a class of representation learning methods that generate dense vector representation for each word in the given text data. The central idea of this paper is to explore the stability measurement of WEMs using intrinsic evaluation based on word similarity. We experiment with three popular WEMs: Word2Vec, GloVe, and fastText. For stability measurement, we investigate the effect of five parameters involved in training these models. We perform experiments using four real-world datasets from different domains: Wikipedia, News, Song lyrics, and European parliament proceedings. We also observe the effect of WEM stability on three downstream tasks: Clustering, POS tagging, and Fairness evaluation. Our experiments indicate that amongst the three WEMs, fastText is the most stable, followed by GloVe and Word2Vec.

Word embedding methods (WEMs) are extensively used for representing text data. The dimensionality of these embeddings varies across various tasks and implementations. The effect of dimensionality change on the accuracy of the downstream task is a well-explored question. However, how the dimensionality change affects the bias of word embeddings needs to be investigated. Using the English Wikipedia corpus, we study this effect for two static (Word2Vec and fastText) and two context-sensitive (ElMo and BERT) WEMs. We have two observations. First, there is a significant variation in the bias of word embeddings with the dimensionality change. Second, there is no uniformity in how the dimensionality change affects the bias of word embeddings. These factors should be considered while selecting the dimensionality of word embeddings.