variational
A General Method for Amortizing Variational Filtering
We introduce the variational filtering EM algorithm, a simple, general-purpose method for performing variational inference in dynamical latent variable models using information from only past and present variables, i.e. filtering. The algorithm is derived from the variational objective in the filtering setting and consists of an optimization procedure at each time step. By performing each inference optimization procedure with an iterative amortized inference model, we obtain a computationally efficient implementation of the algorithm, which we call amortized variational filtering. We present experiments demonstrating that this general-purpose method improves inference performance across several recent deep dynamical latent variable models.
- North America > United States > California (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Media > Music (0.47)
- Leisure & Entertainment (0.47)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models (0.96)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.47)
f-DivergenceVariationalInference
For decades, the dominant paradigm for approximate Bayesian inferencep(z|x) = p(z,x)/p(x) has been Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) algorithms, which estimate the evidencep(x) = R p(z,x)dz via sampling. However, since sampling tends to be a slow and computationally intensive process, these sampling-based approximate inference methods fadewhendealing withthemodern probabilistic machine learning problems that usually involveverycomplexmodels, high-dimensional feature spaces andlargedatasets.
- North America > United States > Illinois (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Asia > China > Guangdong Province > Shenzhen (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > Scotland > City of Glasgow > Glasgow (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > UAE (0.04)
- (2 more...)
2 Background Diffusion models [53] are latent variable models of the formpθ(x0): = R
We show that diffusion models actually are capable of generating high quality samples, sometimes better than the published results on other types of generative models (Section 4). In addition, we show that a certain parameterization of diffusion models reveals an equivalence with denoising score matching over multiple noise levels during training and with annealed Langevin dynamics during sampling (Section 3.2) [55, 61].
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Calabria > Catanzaro Province > Catanzaro (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Alberta > Census Division No. 15 > Improvement District No. 9 > Banff (0.04)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area (0.58)
- Health & Medicine > Diagnostic Medicine > Imaging (0.32)