valuation
Sample Complexity of Automated Mechanism Design
The design of revenue-maximizing combinatorial auctions, i.e. multi item auctions over bundles of goods, is one of the most fundamental problems in computational economics, unsolved even for two bidders and two items for sale. In the traditional economic models, it is assumed that the bidders' valuations are drawn from an underlying distribution and that the auction designer has perfect knowledge of this distribution. Despite this strong and oftentimes unrealistic assumption, it is remarkable that the revenue-maximizing combinatorial auction remains unknown. In recent years, automated mechanism design has emerged as one of the most practical and promising approaches to designing high-revenue combinatorial auctions. The most scalable automated mechanism design algorithms take as input samples from the bidders' valuation distribution and then search for a high-revenue auction in a rich auction class. In this work, we provide the first sample complexity analysis for the standard hierarchy of deterministic combinatorial auction classes used in automated mechanism design. In particular, we provide tight sample complexity bounds on the number of samples needed to guarantee that the empirical revenue of the designed mechanism on the samples is close to its expected revenue on the underlying, unknown distribution over bidder valuations, for each of the auction classes in the hierarchy. In addition to helping set automated mechanism design on firm foundations, our results also push the boundaries of learning theory. In particular, the hypothesis functions used in our contexts are defined through multi stage combinatorial optimization procedures, rather than simple decision boundaries, as are common in machine learning.
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Monaco (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Calabria (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- South America > Chile > Santiago Metropolitan Region > Santiago Province > Santiago (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.14)
- North America > United States > Colorado > Boulder County > Boulder (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Brandenburg > Potsdam (0.04)
- (9 more...)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Baden-Württemberg > Tübingen Region > Tübingen (0.04)
- North America > United States > Hawaii > Honolulu County > Honolulu (0.04)
- (6 more...)
- Europe > Austria > Vienna (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Maryland (0.04)
- (12 more...)
- Energy (0.46)
- Education > Educational Setting > Online (0.45)
- Government (0.45)
- South America > Argentina > Pampas > Buenos Aires F.D. > Buenos Aires (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York > Rensselaer County > Troy (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Hampshire County > Amherst (0.04)
- North America > United States > Colorado (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Optimization (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.93)
- (2 more...)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- Asia > Singapore (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Health & Medicine (0.93)