Automated planning is a prominent area of Artificial Intelligence, and an important component for intelligent autonomous agents. A cornerstone of domain-independent planning is the separation between planning logic, i.e. the automated reasoning side, and the knowledge model, that encodes a formal representation of domain knowledge needed to reason upon a given problem to synthesise a solution plan. Such a separation enables the use of reformulation techniques, which transform how a model is represented in order to improve the efficiency of plan generation. Over the past decades, significant research effort has been devoted to the design of reformulation techniques. In this paper, we present a systematic review of the large body of work on reformulation techniques for classical planning, aiming to provide a holistic view of the field and to foster future research in the area. As a tangible outcome, we provide a qualitative comparison of the existing classes of techniques, that can help researchers gain an overview of their strengths and weaknesses.

PDDL+ models are advanced models of hybrid systems and the resulting problems are notoriously difficult for planning engines to cope with. An additional limiting factor for the exploitation of PDDL+ approaches in real-world applications is the restricted number of domain-independent planning engines that can reason upon those models. With the aim of deepening the understanding of PDDL+ models, in this work, we study a novel mapping between a time discretisation of pddl+ and numeric planning as for PDDL2.1 (level 2). The proposed mapping not only clarifies the relationship between these two formalisms but also enables the use of a wider pool of engines, thus fostering the use of hybrid planning in real-world applications. Our experimental analysis shows the usefulness of the proposed translation and demonstrates the potential of the approach for improving the solvability of complex PDDL+ instances.

Macro-operators (macros) are a well-known technique for enhancing performance of planning engines by providing "short-cuts" in the state space. Existing macro learning systems usually generate macros by considering most frequent action sequences in training plans. Unfortunately, frequent action sequences might not capture meaningful activities as a whole, leading to a limited beneficial impact for the planning process. In this paper, inspired by resource locking in critical sections in parallel computing, we propose a technique that generates macros able to capture whole activities in which limited resources (e.g., a robotic hand, or a truck) are used. Specifically, such a Critical Section macro starts by locking the resource (e.g., grabbing an object), continues by using the resource (e.g., manipulating the object) and finishes by releasing the resource (e.g., dropping the object). Hence, such a macro bridges states in which the resource is locked and cannot be used. We also introduce versions of Critical Section macros dealing with multiple resources and phased locks. Usefulness of macros is evaluated using a range of state-of-the-art planners, and a large number of benchmarks from the deterministic and learning tracks of recent editions of the International Planning Competition.

The separation of planner logic from domain knowledge supports the use of reformulation and configuration techniques, such as macro-actions and entanglements, which transform the model representation in order to improve a planner's performance. One drawback of such an approach is that it may require a potentially expensive training phase. In this paper, we introduce heuristic approaches for the online configuration of planning domain models. The proposed heuristics consider different aspects of PDDL-encoded operators for reordering such operators in the domain model, relying on the assumption that the way in which operators are encoded carries useful information about their expected use.

The development of domain-independent planners within the AI Planning community is leading to "off the shelf" technology that can be used in a wide range of applications. Moreover, it allows a modular approach – in which planners and domain knowledge are modules of larger software applications – that facilitates substitutions or improvements of individual modules without changing the rest of the system. This approach also supports the use of reformulation and configuration techniques, which transform how a model is represented in order to improve the efficiency of plan generation. In this paper, we investigate how the performance of planners is affected by domain model configuration. We introduce a fully automated method for this configuration task, and show in an extensive experimental analysis with six planners and seven domains that this process (which can, in principle, be combined with other forms of reformulation and configuration) can have a remarkable impact on performance across planners. Furthermore, studying the obtained domain model configurations can provide useful information to effectively engineer planning domain models.

The development of a large number of domain-independentplanners is leading to the use of planning engines in a widerange of applications. This is despite the complexity issues inherent in plan generation, which are exacerbated by the separation of planner logic from domain knowledge. However, this separation supports the use of reformulation and configuration techniques, which transform the model representation in order to improve the planner's performance. In this paper, we investigate how the performance of domain-independent planners can be improved by problem model configuration. We introduce a fully automated method for this configuration task, that considers problem-specific aspects extracted by exploiting a problem- and domain-independent representation of the instance. Our extensive experimental analysis shows that this reformulation technique can have a significant impact on planners' performance.