uniformity
The Mass Agreement Score: A Point-centric Measure of Cluster Size Consistency
In clustering, strong dominance in the size of a particular cluster is often undesirable, motivating a measure of cluster size uniformity that can be used to filter such partitions. A basic requirement of such a measure is stability: partitions that differ only slightly in their point assignments should receive similar uniformity scores. A difficulty arises because cluster labels are not fixed objects; algorithms may produce different numbers of labels even when the underlying point distribution changes very little. Measures defined directly over labels can therefore become unstable under label-count perturbations. I introduce the Mass Agreement Score (MAS), a point-centric metric bounded in [0, 1] that evaluates the consistency of expected cluster size as measured from the perspective of points in each cluster. Its construction yields fragment robustness by design, assigning similar scores to partitions with similar bulk structure while remaining sensitive to genuine redistribution of cluster mass.
- North America > United States > New York (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Medford (0.05)
- North America > United States > New York > Tompkins County > Ithaca (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Europe > Iceland > Capital Region > Reykjavik (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- Asia > Afghanistan > Parwan Province > Charikar (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.93)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.93)
- Europe > Sweden > Stockholm > Stockholm (0.05)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- (2 more...)
Appendix: Combating Representation Learning Disparity with Geometric Harmonization
We provide our source codes to ensure the reproducibility of our experimental results. Below we summarize several critical aspects w.r .tthe The datasets we used are all publicly accessible, which is introduced in Appendix E.1. For long-tailed subsets, we strictly follows previous work [29] on CIFAR-100-L T to avoid the bias attribute to the sampling randomness. On ImageNet-L T and Places-L T, we employ the widely-used data split first introduced in [44]. All the experiments are conducted on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 with Python 3.7 and Pytorch 1.7.
- North America > United States (0.14)
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.14)
- Asia > China > Shanghai > Shanghai (0.04)
- Asia > China > Hong Kong (0.04)