Large language models (LLMs) are prone to hallucinations, i.e., statements unsupported by the input or training data, hindering reliable deployment. In parallel, numerous uncertainty estimation (UE) methods have been proposed to quantify model confidence and are often implicitly treated as proxies for model failure. However, the relationship between uncertainty and hallucinations remains insufficiently characterized. We present a systematic empirical study of the association between uncertainty estimators and hallucinations in LLMs. Rather than assuming this association, we evaluate directly when and to what extent it holds. We consider a diverse set of uncertainty estimators, including information-theoretic, sampling-based, and reflexive estimators, and examine their behavior across hallucination settings. Our experiments cover both intrinsic hallucinations (violations of input faithfulness) and extrinsic hallucinations (unsupported claims relative to training data), using four complementary benchmarks, including RAGTruth and HalluLens. We find that the association is highly variable and often weak, depending on the hallucination type and the LLM under evaluation. These results challenge the use of uncertainty as a direct signal of hallucination and clarify when it provides actionable information.

Reliable deployment of machine learning models requires reasoning under epistemic uncertainty--the ability to recognize when the operating distribution has shifted beyond the scope of what was encountered during training. This challenge is central to test-time adaptation (TTA), a paradigm in which a model pretrained on source distribution Ps receives unlabeled data from a target distribution Pt = Ps at deployment time. Existing TTA methods (Wang et al., 2021; Niu et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2022a; Yuan et al., 2023; Su et al., 2022) improve accuracy under distribution shift by adapting model parameters using statistics computed from test batches, but they provide no formal guarantees about when predictions should be trusted or how much risk degrades as a function of shift magnitude. This gap is particularly concerning in safety-critical applications such as autonomous driving, medical imaging, and financial risk assessment, where a model that silently degrades under distribution shift can cause significant harm. The inability to quantify how wrong a model's predictions might be in an unseen environment fundamentally limits its trustworthy deployment.

Spatially referenced datasets have become increasingly prevalent across many fields, largely driven by advances in data collection methods such as satellite remote sensing. In many applications, predictions at unobserved locations are accompanied by reliable uncertainty estimates. While deep learning methods provide both scalable and accurate models for spatial predictions, there remains no clear consensus for addressing uncertainty quantification in spatial deep learning. Monte Carlo (MC) dropout has become a popular approach for uncertainty quantification, yet existing implementations typically focus on tuning the dropout rate while fixing other influential hyperparameters, such as weight decay and the predictive standard deviation multiplier, often through ad-hoc or manual tuning. We propose a cubing-based diagnostic framework that recursively partitions the hyperparameter space to identify stable regions where MC dropout yields well-calibrated predictive intervals. The approach evaluates hyperparameter regions using scoring rules relative to a statistical baseline model, which serves as a calibration anchor. Through a simulation study spanning multiple spatial dependence regimes as well as a large remotely-sensed land surface temperature dataset, we demonstrate that our approach produces competitive or superior predictive intervals compared to the baseline model. Our methodology provides practitioners with a systematic procedure for incorporating uncertainty quantification into spatial deep learning models.

Bayesian inference provides principled uncertainty quantification, but accurate posterior sampling with MCMC can be computationally prohibitive for modern applications. Variational inference (VI) offers a scalable alternative and often yields accurate predictive distributions, but cheap variational families such as mean-field (MF) can produce over-concentrated approximations that miss posterior dependence. We propose variational predictive resampling (VPR), a scalable posterior sampling method that exploits VI's predictive strength within a predictive-resampling framework to better approximate the Bayesian posterior. Given a prior-likelihood pair, VPR repeatedly imputes future observations from the current variational predictive, updates the variational approximation after each imputation, and records the parameter value implied by the completed sample. We establish conditions under which the law of the parameter returned by VPR is well defined and show that its finite-horizon approximation converges to this limit. In a tractable Gaussian location model, we show that VPR with MF variational predictives converges to the exact Bayesian posterior, whereas the optimal MF-VI approximation retains a non-vanishing asymptotic gap. Experiments on linear regression, logistic regression, and hierarchical linear mixed-effects models demonstrate that VPR substantially improves posterior uncertainty quantification and recovers posterior dependence missed by MF-VI, while remaining computationally competitive with, and often more efficient than, MCMC.

Matrix completion is a fundamental problem in machine learning, where the objective is to recover missing entries of a partially observed matrix. A prominent example is the Netflix Prize (Bennett and Lanning, 2007), which involved predicting a matrix of movie ratings by users for recommendation purposes. Beyond recommendation, matrix completion has recently found applications in causal inference for panel data (Athey et al., 2021). A standard assumption in matrix completion is that the underlying matrix is approximately low-rank, reflecting a few latent factors that govern interactions between rows and columns. A substantial body of work has established theoretical guarantees and developed efficient algorithms for matrix completion (Cai, Cand`es and Shen, 2010; Cand`es and Recht, 2008; Keshavan, Montanari, and Oh, 2010; Mazumder, Hastie and Tibshirani, 2010; Recht, 2011), predominantly focusing on cases where the observed entries are continuous-valued. In many applications, however, observations are not continuous-valued but binary.

Reliable uncertainty quantification is essential for the use of machine learning in physics, where scientific discoveries depend on validated probabilistic statements. We provide a structured overview of uncertainty quantification in ML for physics, introducing a unified taxonomy of uncertainty and clarifying the interpretation of predictive and inference uncertainties across frequentist and Bayesian frameworks. We discuss principled validation tools, including coverage, calibration, bias tests, and proper scoring rules, and illustrate them with simple regression and classification examples.

Cocoa (Theobroma cacao) is a critical cash crop for millions of smallholder farmers in West Africa, where Cocoa Swollen Shoot Virus Disease (CSSVD) and anthracnose cause devastating yield losses. Automated disease detection from leaf images is essential for early intervention, yet deploying such systems in resource-constrained settings demands models that are small, fast, and require no internet connectivity. Existing edge-deployable plant disease systems rely on end-to-end deep learning without uncertainty quantification, while Bayesian methods for edge devices focus on hardware-level inference architectures rather than agricultural applications. We bridge this gap with TinyBayes, the first framework to combine a closed-form Bayesian classifier with a mobile-grade computer vision pipeline for crop disease detection. Our pipeline uses YOLOv8-Nano (5.9 MB) for lesion localisation, MobileNetV3-Small (3.5 MB) for feature extraction, and the Jacobi prior; a Bayesian method that provides a closed form non-iterative estimators via projection, for the classification. The Jacobi-DMR (Distributed Multinomial Regression) classifier adds only 13.5 KB to the pipeline, bringing the total model size within 9.5 MB, while achieving 78.7% accuracy on the Amini Cocoa Contamination Challenge dataset and enabling end-to-end CPU inference under 150 ms per image. We benchmark against seven classifiers including Random Forest, SVM, Ridge, Lasso, Elastic Net, XGBoost, and Jacobi-GP, and demonstrate that the Jacobi-DMR offers the best trade-off between accuracy, model size, and inference speed for edge deployment. We have proved the asymptotic equivalence and consistency, asymptotic normality and the bias correction of Jacobi-DMR. All data and codes are available here: https://github.com/shouvik-sardar/TinyBayes

Missing data imputation remains a fundamental challenge in modern data science, especially when uncertainty quantification is essential. In this work, we propose MissBGM, an AI-powered missing data imputation method via Bayesian generative modeling that bridges the expressive flexibility of neural networks with the statistical rigor of Bayesian inference. Unlike existing methods that often focus on point estimates or treat the missingness mechanism implicitly, MissBGM explicitly and jointly models the data-generating and missingness mechanisms, providing principled posterior uncertainty over imputations rather than a single point estimate. We develop a stochastic optimization framework with alternating updates among missing values, model parameters, and latent variables until convergence. Our theoretical analysis shows that estimates of missing values from MissBGM converge consistently under mild assumptions. Empirically, we demonstrate that MissBGM achieves superior performance over traditional imputers and recent neural network-based methods across extensive experimental settings. These results establish MissBGM as a principled and scalable solution for modern missing data imputation.

Bayesian online learning provides a coherent framework for sequential inference. However, its theoretical understanding remains limited, particularly in the one-pass setting. Existing theoretical guarantees typically require the mini-batch sample size to diverge, a condition that fails in the one-pass regime. In this paper, we propose a new Bayesian online learning algorithm tailored to the one-pass setting, which incorporates a warm-start phase to ensure stable sequential updates. For this algorithm, we show that the sequentially updated posterior attains the optimal convergence rate. Building on this, we establish an online analogue of the Bernstein-von Mises theorem, which guarantees valid uncertainty quantification without diverging mini-batch sample sizes. Our analysis is based on a novel theoretical framework that differs fundamentally from existing approaches in the online learning literature. Numerical experiments on generalized linear models show that the proposed method matches the performance of the batch estimator while outperforming existing online procedures.