Model ensembles have long been a cornerstone for improving generalization and robustness in deep learning. However, their effectiveness often comes at the cost of substantial computational overhead. To address this issue, state-of-the-art methods aim to replicate ensemble-class performance without requiring multiple independently trained networks. Unfortunately, these algorithms often still demand considerable compute at inference. In response to these limitations, we introduce $\textbf{NeuroTrails}$, a sparse multi-head architecture with dynamically evolving topology. This unexplored model-agnostic training paradigm improves ensemble performance while reducing the required resources. We analyze the underlying reason for its effectiveness and observe that the various neural trails induced by dynamic sparsity attain a $\textit{Goldilocks zone}$ of prediction diversity. NeuroTrails displays efficacy with convolutional and transformer-based architectures on computer vision and language tasks. Experiments on ResNet-50/ImageNet, LLaMA-350M/C4, among many others, demonstrate increased accuracy and stronger robustness in zero-shot generalization, while requiring significantly fewer parameters.

In today's machine learning world for tabular data, XGBoost and fully connected neural network (FCNN) are two most popular methods due to their good model performance and convenience to use. However, they are highly complicated, hard to interpret, and can be overfitted. In this paper, we propose a new modeling framework called cross spline net (CSN) that is based on a combination of spline transformation and cross-network (Wang et al. 2017, 2021). We will show CSN is as performant and convenient to use, and is less complicated, more interpretable and robust. Moreover, the CSN framework is flexible, as the spline layer can be configured differently to yield different models. With different choices of the spline layer, we can reproduce or approximate a set of non-neural network models, including linear and spline-based statistical models, tree, rule-fit, tree-ensembles (gradient boosting trees, random forest), oblique tree/forests, multi-variate adaptive regression spline (MARS), SVM with polynomial kernel, etc. Therefore, CSN provides a unified modeling framework that puts the above set of non-neural network models under the same neural network framework. By using scalable and powerful gradient descent algorithms available in neural network libraries, CSN avoids some pitfalls (such as being ad-hoc, greedy or non-scalable) in the case-specific optimization methods used in the above non-neural network models. We will use a special type of CSN, TreeNet, to illustrate our point. We will compare TreeNet with XGBoost and FCNN to show the benefits of TreeNet. We believe CSN will provide a flexible and convenient framework for practitioners to build performant, robust and more interpretable models.

For the past few days I've been working on how to implement recursive neural networks in TensorFlow. Recursive neural networks (which I'll call TreeNets from now on to avoid confusion with recurrent neural nets) can be used for learning tree-like structures (more generally, directed acyclic graph structures). They are highly useful for parsing natural scenes and language; see the work of Richard Socher (2011) for examples. More recently, in 2014, Ozan İrsoy used a deep variant of TreeNets to obtain some interesting NLP results. In RNNs, at each time step the network takes as input its previous state s(t-1) and its current input x(t) and produces an output y(t) and a new hidden state s(t).

In RNNs, at each time step the network takes as input its previous state s(t-1) and its current input x(t) and produces an output y(t) and a new hidden state s(t). TreeNets, on the other hand, don't have a simple linear structure like that. With RNNs, you can'unroll' the net and think of it as a large feedforward net with inputs x(0), x(1), …, x(T), initial state s(0), and outputs y(0),y(1),…,y(T), with T varying depending on the input data stream, and the weights in each of the cells tied with each other. You can also think of TreeNets by unrolling them – the weights in each branch node are tied with each other, and the weights in each leaf node are tied with each other. The TreeNet illustrated above has different numbers of inputs in the branch nodes.

For the past few days I've been working on how to implement recursive neural networks in TensorFlow. Recursive neural networks (which I'll call TreeNets from now on to avoid confusion with recurrent neural nets) can be used for learning tree-like structures (more generally, directed acyclic graph structures). They are highly useful for parsing natural scenes and language; see the work of Richard Socher (2011) for examples. More recently, in 2014, Ozan İrsoy used a deep variant of TreeNets to obtain some interesting NLP results. In RNNs, at each time step the network takes as input its previous state s(t-1) and its current input x(t) and produces an output y(t) and a new hidden state s(t).