tree structure
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- Asia > China (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (0.93)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- South America > Chile > Santiago Metropolitan Region > Santiago Province > Santiago (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Chatbot (0.96)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (0.68)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.14)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- (11 more...)
- Overview (0.67)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.46)
Active Learning for Non-Parametric Regression Using Purely Random Trees
Jack Goetz, Ambuj Tewari, Paul Zimmerman
Active learning is the task of using labelled data to select additional points to label, with the goal of fitting the most accurate model with a fixed budget of labelled points. In binary classification active learning is known to produce faster rates than passive learning for a broad range of settings.
- North America > United States > Virginia > Arlington County > Arlington (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Merced County > Merced (0.04)
- (7 more...)
- North America > United States (0.14)
- Europe > Russia > Central Federal District > Moscow Oblast > Moscow (0.04)
- Asia > Russia (0.04)
- Europe > Switzerland (0.04)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.06)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.05)
- North America > United States > New York > Monroe County > Rochester (0.05)
RobustifyingAlgorithmsofLearningLatentTrees withVectorVariables
We consider learning the structures of Gaussian latent tree models with vector observations when a subset of them are arbitrarily corrupted. First, we present the sample complexities of Recursive Grouping (RG)and Chow-Liu Recursive Grouping (CLRG)without theassumption thattheeffectivedepth isbounded in the number of observed nodes, significantly generalizing the results in Choi et al. (2011). We show that Chow-Liu initialization inCLRG greatly reduces the sample complexity ofRG from being exponential in the diameter of the tree to onlylogarithmic inthediameter forthehidden Markovmodel (HMM).
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.04)
- North America > United States > Maryland (0.04)