We study the problem of fitting ontologies and constraints to positive and negative examples that take the form of a finite relational structure. As ontology and constraint languages, we consider the description logics $\mathcal{E\mkern-2mu L}$ and $\mathcal{E\mkern-2mu LI}$ as well as several classes of tuple-generating dependencies (TGDs): full, guarded, frontier-guarded, frontier-one, and unrestricted TGDs as well as inclusion dependencies. We pinpoint the exact computational complexity, design algorithms, and analyze the size of fitting ontologies and TGDs. We also investigate the related problem of constructing a finite basis of concept inclusions / TGDs for a given set of finite structures. While finite bases exist for $\mathcal{E\mkern-2mu L}$, $\mathcal{E\mkern-2mu LI}$, guarded TGDs, and inclusion dependencies, they in general do not exist for full, frontier-guarded and frontier-one TGDs.

In this paper, we propose the use of epistemic dependencies to express data protection policies in Controlled Query Evaluation (CQE), which is a form of confidentiality-preserving query answering over ontologies and databases. The resulting policy language goes significantly beyond those proposed in the literature on CQE so far, allowing for very rich and practically interesting forms of data protection rules. We show the expressive abilities of our framework and study the data complexity of CQE for (unions of) conjunctive queries when ontologies are specified in the Description Logic DL-Lite_R. Interestingly, while we show that the problem is in general intractable, we prove tractability for the case of acyclic epistemic dependencies by providing a suitable query rewriting algorithm. The latter result paves the way towards the implementation and practical application of this new approach to CQE.

The chase procedure is a fundamental algorithmic tool in databases that allows us to reason with constraints, such as existential rules, with a plethora of applications. It takes as input a database and a set of constraints, and iteratively completes the database as dictated by the constraints. A key challenge, though, is the fact that it may not terminate, which leads to the problem of checking whether it terminates given a database and a set of constraints. In this work, we focus on the semi-oblivious version of the chase, which is well-suited for practical implementations, and linear existential rules, a central class of constraints with several applications. In this setting, there is a mature body of theoretical work that provides syntactic characterizations of when the chase terminates, algorithms for checking chase termination, precise complexity results, and worst-case optimal bounds on the size of the result of the chase (whenever is finite). Our main objective is to experimentally evaluate the existing chase termination algorithms with the aim of understanding which input parameters affect their performance, clarifying whether they can be used in practice, and revealing their performance limitations.

We study the problem to decide, given sets T1,T2 of tuple-generating dependencies (TGDs), also called existential rules, whether T2 is a conservative extension of T1. We consider two natural notions of conservative extension, one pertaining to answers to conjunctive queries over databases and one to homomorphisms between chased databases. Our main results are that these problems are undecidable for linear TGDs, undecidable for guarded TGDs even when T1 is empty, and decidable for frontier-one TGDs.

Existential rule languages are a family of ontology languages that have been widely used in ontology-mediated query answering (OMQA). However, for most of them, the expressive power of representing domain knowledge for OMQA, known as the program expressive power, is not well-understood yet. In this paper, we establish a number of novel characterizations for the program expressive power of several important existential rule languages, including tuple-generating dependencies (TGDs), linear TGDs, as well as disjunctive TGDs. The characterizations employ natural model-theoretic properties, and automata-theoretic properties sometimes, which thus provide powerful tools for identifying the definability of domain knowledge for OMQA in these languages.

Ontological query answering is the problem of answering queries in the presence of schema constraints representing the domain of interest. Datalog+/- is a common family of languages for schema constraints, including tuple-generating dependencies (TGDs) and equality-generating dependencies (EGDs). The interplay of TGDs and EGDs leads to undecidability or intractability of query answering when adding EGDs to tractable Datalog+/- fragments, like Warded Datalog+/-, for which, in the sole presence of TGDs, query answering is PTIME in data complexity. There have been attempts to limit the interaction of TGDs and EGDs and guarantee tractability, in particular with the introduction of separable EGDs, to make EGDs irrelevant for query answering as long as the set of constraints is satisfied. While being tractable, separable EGDs have limited expressive power. We propose a more general class of EGDs, which we call ``harmless'', that subsume separable EGDs and allow to model a much broader class of problems. Unlike separable EGDs, harmless EGDs, besides enforcing ground equality constraints, specialize the query answer by grounding or renaming the labelled nulls introduced by existential quantification in the TGDs. Harmless EGDs capture the cases when the answer obtained in the presence of EGDs is less general than the one obtained with TGDs only. We conclude that the theoretical problem of deciding whether a set of constraints contains harmless EGDs is undecidable. We contribute a sufficient syntactic condition characterizing harmless EGDs, broad and useful in practice. We focus on Warded Datalog+/- with harmless EGDs and argue that, in such fragment, query answering is decidable and PTIME in data complexity. We study chase-based techniques for query answering in Warded Datalog+/- with harmless EGDs, conducive to an efficient algorithm to be implemented in state-of-the-art reasoners.

Towards a deep understanding of these languages in model theory, we establish model-theoretic characterizations for a number of existential rule languages such as (disjunctive) embedded dependencies, tuple-generating dependencies (TGDs), (frontier-)guarded TGDs and linear TGDs. All these characterizations hold for arbitrary structures, and most of them also work on the class of finite structures. As a natural application of these characterizations, complexity bounds for the rewritability of above languages are also identified. 1 Introduction Existential rule languages, a family of languages that extend Datalog by allowing existential quantifiers in the rule head, had been initially introduced in databases in 1970s to specify the semantics of data stored in a database [ Abiteboul et al., 1995] . Since then, existential rule languages such as tuple-generating dependencies (TGDs), embedded dependencies and equality-generating dependencies have been extensively studied. These language have been recently rediscovered as languages for data exchange [ Fagin et al., 2005 ], data integration [ Lenzerini, 2002 ] and ontology-mediated query answering [ Cal ı et al., 2010 ] .

Ontology-mediated querying and querying in the presence of constraints are two key database problems where tuple-generating dependencies (TGDs) play a central role. In ontology-mediated querying, TGDs can formalize the ontology and thus derive additional facts from the given data, while in querying in the presence of constraints, they restrict the set of admissible databases. In this work, we study the limits of efficient query evaluation in the context of the above two problems, focussing on guarded and frontier-guarded TGDs and on UCQs as the actual queries. We show that a class of ontology-mediated queries (OMQs) based on guarded TGDs can be evaluated in FPT iff the OMQs in the class are equivalent to OMQs in which the actual query has bounded treewidth, up to some reasonable assumptions. For querying in the presence of constraints, we consider classes of constraint-query specifications (CQSs) that bundle a set of constraints with an actual query. We show a dichotomy result for CQSs based on guarded TGDs that parallels the one for OMQs except that, additionally, FPT coincides with PTime combined complexity. The proof is based on a novel connection between OMQ and CQS evaluation. Using a direct proof, we also show a similar dichotomy result, again up to some reasonable assumptions, for CQSs based on frontier-guarded TGDs with a bounded number of atoms in TGD heads. Our results on CQSs can be viewed as extensions of Grohe's well-known characterization of the tractable classes of CQs (without constraints). Like Grohe's characterization, all the above results assume that the arity of relation symbols is bounded by a constant. We also study the associated meta problems, i.e., whether a given OMQ or CQS is equivalent to one in which the actual query has bounded treewidth.

The chase is a sound and complete algorithm for conjunctive query answering over ontologies of existential rules with equality. To enable its effective use, we can apply acyclicity notions; that is, sufficient conditions that guarantee chase termination. Unfortunately, most of these notions have only been defined for existential rule sets without equality. A proposed solution to circumvent this issue is to treat equality as an ordinary predicate with an explicit axiomatisation. We empirically show that this solution is not efficient in practice and propose an alternative approach. More precisely, we show that, if the chase terminates for any equality axiomatisation of an ontology, then it terminates for the original ontology (which may contain equality). Therefore, one can apply existing acyclicity notions to check chase termination over an axiomatisation of an ontology and then use the original ontology for reasoning. We show that, in practice, doing so results in a more efficient reasoning procedure. Furthermore, we present equality model-faithful acyclicity, a general acyclicity notion that can be directly applied to ontologies with equality.

Forecasting natural gas demand is a key problem for energy providers, as it allows for efficient pipe reservation and power plant allocation, and enables effective price forecasting. We propose a study of Italian gas demand, with particular focus on industrial and thermoelectric components. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work about these topics. After a preliminary discussion on the characteristics of gas demand, we apply several statistical learning models to perform day-ahead forecasting, including regularized linear models, random forest, support vector regression and neural networks. Moreover, we introduce four simple ensemble models and we compare their performance with the one of basic forecasters. The out-of-sample Mean Absolute Error (MAE) achieved on 2017 by our best ensemble model is 5.16 Millions of Standard Cubic Meters (MSCM), lower than 9.57 MSCM obtained by the predictions issued by SNAM, the Italian Transmission System Operator (TSO).