In recent years, fueled by the rapid advancement of diffusion models, text-to-video (T2V) generation models have achieved remarkable progress, with notable examples including Pika, Luma, Kling, and Open-Sora. Although these models exhibit impressive generative capabilities, they also expose significant security risks due to their vulnerability to jailbreak attacks, where the models are manipulated to produce unsafe content such as pornography, violence, or discrimination. Existing works such as T2VSafetyBench provide preliminary benchmarks for safety evaluation, but lack systematic methods for thoroughly exploring model vulnerabilities. To address this gap, we are the first to formalize the T2V jailbreak attack as a discrete optimization problem and propose a joint objective-based optimization framework, called \emph{T2V-OptJail}. This framework consists of two key optimization goals: bypassing the built-in safety filtering mechanisms to increase the attack success rate, preserving semantic consistency between the adversarial prompt and the unsafe input prompt, as well as between the generated video and the unsafe input prompt, to enhance content controllability. In addition, we introduce an iterative optimization strategy guided by prompt variants, where multiple semantically equivalent candidates are generated in each round, and their scores are aggregated to robustly guide the search toward optimal adversarial prompts. We conduct large-scale experiments on several T2V models, covering both open-source models (\textit{e.g.}, Open-Sora) and real commercial closed-source models (\textit{e.g.}, Pika, Luma, Kling). The experimental results show that the proposed method improves 11.4\% and 10.0\% over the existing state-of-the-art method (SoTA) in terms of attack success rate assessed by GPT-4, attack success rate assessed by human accessors, respectively, verifying the significant advantages of the method in terms of attack effectiveness and content control. This study reveals the potential abuse risk of the semantic alignment mechanism in the current T2V model and provides a basis for the design of subsequent jailbreak defense methods.

This paper investigates the role of explicit thinking process in rule-based reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) for multi-modal large language models (MLLMs). We first extend \textit{Thinking-RFT} to image classification task, using verifiable rewards for fine-tuning~(FT). Experiments show {Thinking-RFT} significantly outperforms supervised FT and yields a cross-dataset generalization effect. We then rethink and question whether explicit thinking in RFT is always necessary and beneficial. Challenging the convention that explicit thinking is crucial for the success of RFT, we introduce \textit{No-Thinking-RFT}, exploring RFT without thinking by introducing a simple equality accuracy reward. We evaluate No-Thinking-RFT on six diverse tasks across different model sizes and types. Experiment results reveal four key findings: \textbf{(1).} Visual perception tasks do not require thinking during RFT, as No-Thinking-RFT consistently outperforms or matches Thinking-RFT across model sizes and types.

When some parameters of a constrained optimization problem (COP) are uncertain, this gives rise to a predict-then-optimize (PtO) problem, comprising two stages: the \textit{prediction} of the unknown parameters from contextual information and the subsequent \textit{optimization} using those predicted parameters. Decision-focused learning (DFL) implements the first stage by training a machine learning (ML) model to optimize the quality of the decisions made using the predicted parameters. When the predicted parameters occur in the constraints, they can lead to infeasible solutions. Therefore, it is important to simultaneously manage both feasibility and decision quality. We develop a DFL framework for predicting constraint parameters in a generic COP.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has shown impressive capabilities in mitigating hallucinations in large language models (LLMs). However, LLMs struggle to maintain consistent reasoning when exposed to misleading or conflicting evidence, especially in real-world domains such as politics, where information is polarized or selectively framed. Mainstream RAG benchmarks evaluate models under clean retrieval settings, where systems generate answers from gold-standard documents, or under synthetically perturbed settings, where documents are artificially injected with noise. These assumptions fail to reflect real-world conditions, often leading to an overestimation of RAG system performance. To address this gap, we introduce \textsc{RAGuard}, the first benchmark to evaluate the robustness of RAG systems against \textit{misleading} retrievals. Unlike prior benchmarks that rely on synthetic noise, our fact-checking dataset captures naturally occurring misinformation by constructing its retrieval corpus from Reddit discussions. It categorizes retrieved evidence into three types: \textit{supporting}, \textit{misleading}, and \textit{unrelated}, providing a realistic and challenging testbed for assessing how well RAG systems navigate different types of evidence. Our experiments reveal that, when exposed to potentially misleading retrievals, all tested LLM-powered RAG systems perform worse than their zero-shot baselines (i.e., no retrieval at all), while human annotators consistently perform better, highlighting LLMs' susceptibility to noisy environments. To our knowledge, \textsc{RAGuard} is the first benchmark to systematically assess the robustness of the RAG against misleading evidence.We expect this benchmark to drive future research toward improving RAG systems beyond idealized datasets, making them more reliable for real-world applications.

A major distinction between video and image understanding is that the former requires reasoning over time. Existing Video Large Language Models (VLLMs) demonstrate promising performance in general video understanding, such as brief captioning or object recognition within individual frames. However, they often struggle with temporal reasoning such as understanding continuous actions or tracking object transformations over time--which typically demands the integration of multiple frames in a temporally coherent manner. We first explore and explain such failures in Video LLMs from the perspective of \textit{language and ``image'' priors.} While existing research has attempted to enhance the temporal understanding of VLLMs through various training strategies, the demand for expensive computational resources and training data often presents significant barriers.

A common view of sensory processing is as probabilistic inference of latent causes from receptor activations. Standard approaches often assume these causes are \textit{a priori} independent, yet real-world generative factors are typically correlated. Representing such structured priors in neural systems poses architectural challenges, particularly when direct interactions between units representing latent causes are biologically implausible or computationally expensive. Inspired by the architecture of the olfactory bulb, we propose a novel circuit motif that enables inference with correlated priors without requiring direct interactions among latent cause units. The key insight lies in using \textit{sister cells}: neurons receiving shared receptor input but connected differently to local interneurons.

Human communication is $\textit{motivated}$: people speak, write, and create content with a particular communicative intent in mind. As a result, information that large language models (LLMs) and AI agents process is inherently framed by humans' intentions and incentives. People are adept at navigating such nuanced information: we routinely identify benevolent or self-serving motives in order to decide what statements to trust. For LLMs to be effective in the real world, they too must critically evaluate content by factoring in the motivations of the source---for instance, weighing the credibility of claims made in a sales pitch. In this paper, we undertake a comprehensive study of whether LLMs have this capacity for $\textit{motivational vigilance}$.

Neural networks offer a promising data-driven approach to tackle computationally challenging optimization problems. In this work, we introduce neural approximation frameworks for a family of geometric extent measure problems, including shape-fitting descriptors (e.g.

The family of feed-forward reconstruction model regresses pointmap of all input images to a reference frame coordinate system, along with other auxiliary outputs, in a single forward pass. However, we find that current models struggle with fine geometry and robustness due to (\textit{i}) the scarcity of high-fidelity depth and pose supervision and (\textit{ii}) the inherent geometric misalignment from multi-view pointmap regression. Fin3R jointly tackles two issues with an extra lightweight fine-tuning step. We freeze the decoder, which handles view matching, and fine-tune only the image encoder--the component dedicated to feature extraction. The encoder is enriched with fine geometric details distilled from a strong monocular teacher model on large, unlabeled datasets, using a custom, lightweight LoRA adapter.

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) achieve strong performance in node classification tasks but exhibit substantial performance degradation under label noise. Despite recent advances in noise-robust learning, a principled approach that exploits the node-neighbor interdependencies inherent in graph data for label noise detection remains underexplored. To address this gap, we propose GD$^2$, a noise-aware \underline{G}raph learning framework that detects label noise by leveraging \underline{D}ual-view prediction \underline{D}iscrepancies. The framework contrasts the \textit{ego-view}, constructed from node-specific features, with the \textit{structure-view}, derived through the aggregation of neighboring representations.