Continual Learning (CL) remains a central challenge in deep learning, where models must sequentially acquire new knowledge while mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting (CF) of prior tasks. Existing approaches often struggle with efficiency and scalability, requiring extensive memory or model buffers. This work introduces ``No Forgetting Learning" (NFL), a memory-free CL framework that leverages knowledge distillation to maintain stability while preserving plasticity. Memory-free means the NFL does not rely on any memory buffer. Through extensive evaluations of three benchmark datasets, we demonstrate that NFL achieves competitive performance while utilizing approximately 14.75 times less memory than state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, we introduce a new metric to better assess CL's plasticity-stability trade-off.

In class-incremental learning (class-IL), models must classify all previously seen classes at test time without task-IDs, leading to task confusion. Despite being a key challenge, task confusion lacks a theoretical understanding. We present a novel mathematical framework for class-IL and prove the Infeasibility Theorem, showing optimal class-IL is impossible with discriminative modeling due to task confusion. However, we establish the Feasibility Theorem, demonstrating that generative modeling can achieve optimal class-IL by overcoming task confusion. We then assess popular class-IL strategies, including regularization, bias-correction, replay, and generative classifier, using our framework. Our analysis suggests that adopting generative modeling, either for generative replay or direct classification (generative classifier), is essential for optimal class-IL.

In recent years, continual learning (CL) techniques have made significant progress in learning from streaming data while preserving knowledge across sequential tasks, particularly in the realm of euclidean data. To foster fair evaluation and recognize challenges in CL settings, several evaluation frameworks have been proposed, focusing mainly on the single- and multi-label classification task on euclidean data. However, these evaluation frameworks are not trivially applicable when the input data is graph-structured, as they do not consider the topological structure inherent in graphs. Existing continual graph learning (CGL) evaluation frameworks have predominantly focussed on single-label scenarios in the node classification (NC) task. This focus has overlooked the complexities of multi-label scenarios, where nodes may exhibit affiliations with multiple labels, simultaneously participating in multiple tasks. We develop a graph-aware evaluation (\agale) framework that accommodates both single-labeled and multi-labeled nodes, addressing the limitations of previous evaluation frameworks. In particular, we define new incremental settings and devise data partitioning algorithms tailored to CGL datasets. We perform extensive experiments comparing methods from the domains of continual learning, continual graph learning, and dynamic graph learning (DGL). We theoretically analyze \agale and provide new insights about the role of homophily in the performance of compared methods. We release our framework at https://github.com/Tianqi-py/AGALE.

Continual Learning (CL) is the process of learning ceaselessly a sequence of tasks. Most existing CL methods deal with independent data (e.g., images and text) for which many benchmark frameworks and results under standard experimental settings are available. However, CL methods for graph data (graph CL) are surprisingly underexplored because of (a) the lack of standard experimental settings, especially regarding how to deal with the dependency between instances, (b) the lack of benchmark datasets and scenarios, and (c) high complexity in implementation and evaluation due to the dependency. In this paper, regarding (a), we define four standard incremental settings (task-, class-, domain-, and time-incremental) for graph data, which are naturally applied to many node-, link-, and graph-level problems. Regarding (b), we provide 25 benchmark scenarios based on 15 real-world graphs. Regarding (c), we develop BeGin, an easy and fool-proof framework for graph CL. BeGin is easily extended since it is modularized with reusable modules for data processing, algorithm design, and evaluation. Especially, the evaluation module is completely separated from user code to eliminate potential mistakes. Using all the above, we report extensive benchmark results of 10 graph CL methods. Compared to the latest benchmark for graph CL, using BeGin, we cover 3x more combinations of incremental settings and levels of problems. All assets for the benchmark framework are available at https://github.com/ShinhwanKang/BeGin.

Recent years have seen great advancements in the development of deep learning models for histopathology image analysis in digital pathology applications, evidenced by the increasingly common deployment of these models in both research and clinical settings. Although such models have shown unprecedented performance in solving fundamental computational tasks in DP applications, they suffer from catastrophic forgetting when adapted to unseen data with transfer learning. With an increasing need for deep learning models to handle ever changing data distributions, including evolving patient population and new diagnosis assays, continual learning models that alleviate model forgetting need to be introduced in DP based analysis. However, to our best knowledge, there is no systematic study of such models for DP-specific applications. Here, we propose CL scenarios in DP settings, where histopathology image data from different sources/distributions arrive sequentially, the knowledge of which is integrated into a single model without training all the data from scratch. We then established an augmented dataset for colorectal cancer H&E classification to simulate shifts of image appearance and evaluated CL model performance in the proposed CL scenarios. We leveraged a breast tumor H&E dataset along with the colorectal cancer to evaluate CL from different tumor types. In addition, we evaluated CL methods in an online few-shot setting under the constraints of annotation and computational resources. We revealed promising results of CL in DP applications, potentially paving the way for application of these methods in clinical practice.