Our approach is purely based on 2D convolutions. Nevertheless, it3 outperforms or performs comparably to many more costly 3D models. We thank the reviewers for pointing out some related (or missing) references. The12 Timeception layers involve group convolutions at different time scales while our TAM layers only use depthwise13 convolution. As a result, the Timeception has significantly more parameters than the TAM (10% vs. 0.1% of the14 totalmodelparameters).

In appendix, we Reward OptimizationWepropose .

The code for our experiments is available at https://github.com/AndyShih12/HyperSPN. To examine the merits of HyperSPNs as discussed in Section 3, we construct a hand-crafted dataset to test the three types of models described in Figure 4: SPN-Large, SPN-Small, and HyperSPN. The hand-crafted dataset is procedurally generated with 256 binary variables and 10000 instances, broken into train/valid/test splits at 70/10/20%. The generation procedure is designed such that the correlation between variable i and j is dependent on the path length between leaves i and j of a complete binary tree over the 256 variables. The exact details can be found in our code.

Usage Application The model is intended for open-vocabulary object detection.Known Caveats

Major challenges in scaling self-training are the choice of label space, pseudo-annotation filtering, and training efficiency.

Model details can be found at https://huggingface.co/gpt2 Popular phrases such as "pair of" are examples of repetitive