The combination of higher-order theories and fuzzy logic can be useful in decision-making tasks that involve reasoning across abstract functions and predicates, where exact matches are often rare or unnecessary. Developing efficient reasoning and computational techniques for such a combined formalism presents a significant challenge. In this paper, we adopt a more straightforward approach aiming at integrating two well-established and computationally well-behaved components: higher-order patterns on one side and fuzzy equivalences expressed through similarity relations based on minimum T-norm on the other. We propose a unification algorithm for higher-order patterns modulo these similarity relations and prove its termination, soundness, and completeness. This unification problem, like its crisp counterpart, is unitary. The algorithm computes a most general unifier with the highest degree of approximation when the given terms are unifiable.

Rule-based models play a crucial role in scenarios that require transparency and accountable decision-making. However, they primarily consist of discrete parameters and structures, which presents challenges for scalability and optimization. In this work, we introduce a new rule-based classifier trained using gradient descent, in which the user can control the maximum number and length of the rules. For numerical partitions, the user can also control the partitions used with fuzzy sets, which also helps keep the number of partitions small. We perform a series of exhaustive experiments on $40$ datasets to show how this classifier performs in terms of accuracy and rule base size. Then, we compare our results with a genetic search that fits an equivalent classifier and with other explainable and non-explainable state-of-the-art classifiers. Our results show how our method can obtain compact rule bases that use significantly fewer patterns than other rule-based methods and perform better than other explainable classifiers.

Given an image, a back-ground knowledge, and a set of questions about an object, human learners answer the questions very consistently regardless of question forms and semantic tasks. The current advancement in neural-network based Visual Question Answering (VQA), despite their impressive performance, cannot ensure such consistency due to identically distribution (i.i.d.) assumption. We propose a new model-agnostic logic constraint to tackle this issue by formulating a logically consistent loss in the multi-task learning framework as well as a data organisation called family-batch and hybrid-batch. To demonstrate usefulness of this proposal, we train and evaluate MAC-net based VQA machines with and without the proposed logically consistent loss and the proposed data organization. The experiments confirm that the proposed loss formulae and introduction of hybrid-batch leads to more consistency as well as better performance. Though the proposed approach is tested with MAC-net, it can be utilised in any other QA methods whenever the logical consistency between answers exist.

The management of uncertainty in expert systems has usually been left to ad hoc representations and rules of combinations lacking either a sound theory or clear semantics. The objective of this paper is to establish a theoretical basis for defining the syntax and semantics of a small subset of calculi of uncertainty operating on a given term set of linguistic statements of likelihood. Each calculus is defined by specifying a negation, a conjunction and a disjunction operator. Families of Triangular norms and conorms constitute the most general representations of conjunction and disjunction operators. These families provide us with a formalism for defining an infinite number of different calculi of uncertainty. The term set will define the uncertainty granularity, i.e. the finest level of distinction among different quantifications of uncertainty. This granularity will limit the ability to differentiate between two similar operators. Therefore, only a small finite subset of the infinite number of calculi will produce notably different results. This result is illustrated by two experiments where nine and eleven different calculi of uncertainty are used with three term sets containing five, nine, and thirteen elements, respectively. Finally, the use of context dependent rule set is proposed to select the most appropriate calculus for any given situation. Such a rule set will be relatively small since it must only describe the selection policies for a small number of calculi (resulting from the analyzed trade-off between complexity and precision).

Active Learning Method (ALM) is a soft computing method used for modeling and control based on fuzzy logic. All operators defined for fuzzy sets must serve as either fuzzy S-norm or fuzzy T-norm. Despite being a powerful modeling method, ALM does not possess operators which serve as S-norms and T-norms which deprive it of a profound analytical expression/form. This paper introduces two new operators based on morphology which satisfy the following conditions: First, they serve as fuzzy S-norm and T-norm. Second, they satisfy Demorgans law, so they complement each other perfectly. These operators are investigated via three viewpoints: Mathematics, Geometry and fuzzy logic.