Goto

Collaborating Authors

 superclass



Results

Neural Information Processing Systems

In addition to CYCLIP described in 2, we train two more instantiations of it by keeping either of the two consistency regularizers active in the loss objective (Eq. The instantiation trained by setting λ1 = 0and λ2 = 0.5is termed as C-CYCLIP as only cross-modal consistency regularizer term is added to the loss objective. Similarly, we get I-CYCLIP where only in-modal consistency regularizer is added to the loss by setting λ1 = 0.5 and λ2 = 0. We evaluate C-CYCLIP and I-CYCLIP on most of the experiments discussed in the main text to understand their zero-shot transfer ability on standard datasets and robustness to natural distribution shifts. A.1 Zero-shot Transfer Table 7 presents our results of the zero-shot transfer experiment described in 3.1. We find that CYCLIP outperforms its sub-variants and the CLIP model on the ImageNet1K dataset.


Classification Done Right for Vision-Language Pre-Training

Neural Information Processing Systems

We introduce SuperClass, a super simple classification method for vision-language pre-training on image-text data. Unlike its contrastive counterpart CLIP who contrast with a text encoder, SuperClass directly utilizes tokenized raw text as supervised classification labels, without the need for additional text filtering or selection. Due to the absence of the text encoding as contrastive target, SuperClass does not require a text encoder and does not need to maintain a large batch size as CLIP does. SuperClass demonstrated superior performance on various downstream tasks, including classic computer vision benchmarks and vision language downstream tasks. We further explored the scaling behavior of SuperClass on model size, training length, or data size, and reported encouraging results and comparisons to CLIP.




Granularity__final

Neural Information Processing Systems

We use the iWildCam version 2.0 released in 2021 as a Examples of train set images can be seen in Figure 14. Random examples from the out-of-distribution test set. Figure 15 shows examples of train set images. Figure 15: Random examples from the ImageNet ILSVRC 2012 challenge train set [37, 11]. The full training set is notably not class balanced, exhibiting a long-tailed distribution (see Figure 16). Figure 17: Random examples from the iNaturalist 2017 challenge train set [46].




Automated Classification of Model Errors on ImageNet

Neural Information Processing Systems

While the ImageNet dataset has been driving computer vision research over the past decade, significant label noise and ambiguity have made top-1 accuracy an insufficient measure of further progress.