We show that multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) with full parameter sharing outperforms independent and partially shared architectures in the competitive perfect-information homogenous game of Chinese Checkers. To run our experiments, we develop a new MARL environment: variable-size, six-player Chinese Checkers. This custom environment was developed in PettingZoo and supports all traditional rules of the game including chaining jumps. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first implementation of Chinese Checkers that remains faithful to the true game. Chinese Checkers is difficult to learn due to its large branching factor and potentially infinite horizons. We borrow the concept of branching actions (submoves) from complex action spaces in other RL domains, where a submove may not end a player's turn immediately. This drastically reduces the dimensionality of the action space. Our observation space is inspired by AlphaGo with many binary game boards stacked in a 3D array to encode information. The PettingZoo environment, training and evaluation logic, and analysis scripts can be found on \href{https://github.com/noahadhikari/pettingzoo-chinese-checkers}{Github}.

In many games, moves consist of several decisions made by the player. These decisions can be viewed as separate moves, which is already a common practice in multi-action games for efficiency reasons. Such division of a player move into a sequence of simpler / lower level moves is called \emph{splitting}. So far, split moves have been applied only in forementioned straightforward cases, and furthermore, there was almost no study revealing its impact on agents' playing strength. Taking the knowledge-free perspective, we aim to answer how to effectively use split moves within Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) and what is the practical impact of split design on agents' strength. This paper proposes a generalization of MCTS that works with arbitrarily split moves. We design several variations of the algorithm and try to measure the impact of split moves separately on efficiency, quality of MCTS, simulations, and action-based heuristics. The tests are carried out on a set of board games and performed using the Regular Boardgames General Game Playing formalism, where split strategies of different granularity can be automatically derived based on an abstract description of the game. The results give an overview of the behavior of agents using split design in different ways. We conclude that split design can be greatly beneficial for single- as well as multi-action games.