Subdata selection is a study of methods that select a small representative sample of the big data, the analysis of which is fast and statistically efficient. The existing subdata selection methods assume that the big data can be reasonably modeled using an underlying model, such as a (multinomial) logistic regression for classification problems. These methods work extremely well when the underlying modeling assumption is correct but often yield poor results otherwise. In this paper, we propose a model-free subdata selection method for classification problems, and the resulting subdata is called PED subdata. The PED subdata uses decision trees to find a partition of the data, followed by selecting an appropriate sample from each component of the partition. Random forests are used for analyzing the selected subdata. Our method can be employed for a general number of classes in the response and for both categorical and continuous predictors. We show analytically that the PED subdata results in a smaller Gini than a uniform subdata. Further, we demonstrate that the PED subdata has higher classification accuracy than other competing methods through extensive simulated and real datasets.

Subsampling or subdata selection is a useful approach in large-scale statistical learning. Most existing studies focus on model-based subsampling methods which significantly depend on the model assumption. In this paper, we consider the model-free subsampling strategy for generating subdata from the original full data. In order to measure the goodness of representation of a subdata with respect to the original data, we propose a criterion, generalized empirical F-discrepancy (GEFD), and study its theoretical properties in connection with the classical generalized L2-discrepancy in the theory of uniform designs. These properties allow us to develop a kind of low-GEFD data-driven subsampling method based on the existing uniform designs. By simulation examples and a real case study, we show that the proposed subsampling method is superior to the random sampling method. Moreover, our method keeps robust under diverse model specifications while other popular subsampling methods are under-performing. In practice, such a model-free property is more appealing than the model-based subsampling methods, where the latter may have poor performance when the model is misspecified, as demonstrated in our simulation studies.