spike train
Bayesian latent structure discovery from multi-neuron recordings
Neural circuits contain heterogeneous groups of neurons that differ in type, location, connectivity, and basic response properties. However, traditional methods for dimensionality reduction and clustering are ill-suited to recovering the structure underlying the organization of neural circuits. In particular, they do not take advantage of the rich temporal dependencies in multi-neuron recordings and fail to account for the noise in neural spike trains. Here we describe new tools for inferring latent structure from simultaneously recorded spike train data using a hierarchical extension of a multi-neuron point process model commonly known as the generalized linear model (GLM). Our approach combines the GLM with flexible graph-theoretic priors governing the relationship between latent features and neural connectivity patterns. Fully Bayesian inference via Pólya-gamma augmentation of the resulting model allows us to classify neurons and infer latent dimensions of circuit organization from correlated spike trains. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method with applications to synthetic data and multi-neuron recordings in primate retina, revealing latent patterns of neural types and locations from spike trains alone.
- Asia > Singapore > Central Region > Singapore (0.04)
- North America > United States > Colorado > Denver County > Denver (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.05)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > New York (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Israel (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas > Brazos County > College Station (0.14)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Middlesex County > Piscataway (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.66)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.66)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (0.92)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.67)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.46)
- North America > United States > Virginia (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Switzerland > Vaud > Lausanne (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Cognitive Science (0.95)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.47)