span
- North America > United States > Michigan (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Chūbu > Ishikawa Prefecture > Kanazawa (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas (0.04)
- Europe > Slovakia (0.04)
- Europe > Poland (0.04)
- Asia > China (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts (0.04)
- North America > United States > Florida > Martin County > Stuart (0.04)
- Law (1.00)
- Information Technology (1.00)
- Banking & Finance > Real Estate (0.93)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Mercer County > Princeton (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Louisiana > Orleans Parish > New Orleans (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Kantō > Kanagawa Prefecture (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.67)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.67)
MomentDiff: Generative Video Moment Retrieval from Random to Real
To achieve this goal, we provide a generative diffusion-based framework called MomentDiff, which simulates a typical human retrieval process from random browsing to gradual localization. Specifically, we first diffuse the real span to random noise, and learn to denoise the random noise to the original span with the guidance of similarity between text and video.
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (0.69)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (0.68)
A Proof of Proposition 2.5
Proposition 2.5 is a direct consequence of the following lemma (remember that Lemma A.1 (Smooth functions conserved through a given flow.) . Assume that @h () ()=0 for all 2 . Let us first show the direct inclusion. Now let us show the converse inclusion. We recall (cf Example 2.10 and Example 2.11) that linear and Assumption 2.9, which we recall reads as: Theorem 2.14, let us show that (9) holds for standard ML losses.