Neural networks are known to develop latent representations that are $aligned$, namely structurally similar across networks trained with different architectures, training protocols, or training datasets. We study this phenomenon in a controlled setting, where we train an ensemble of networks on regression and classification tasks using training sets perturbed by independent realizations of a noise process. We show that the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the training sample size influence the alignment in qualitatively similar ways in networks trained on real-world datasets and in an extremely simple $linear$ network with a single hidden layer, for which the alignment can be estimated analytically. Across linear and nonlinear networks, regression and classification tasks, and both synthetic and real-world data, we consistently observe that alignment varies monotonically with SNR but non-monotonically with training sample size. In particular, the alignment is minimized near the interpolation threshold, and a stronger alignment does not necessarily correspond to better generalization error. These findings reveal a non-trivial dependence of alignment on data quality and quantity, decoupled from generalization performance.

This study surveys the historical development of regularization, tracing its evolution from stepwise regression in the 1960s to recent advancements in formal error control, structured penalties for non-independent features, Bayesian methods, and l0-based regularization (among other techniques). We empirically evaluate the performance of four canonical frameworks -- Ridge, Lasso, ElasticNet, and Post-Lasso OLS -- across 134,400 simulations spanning a 7-dimensional manifold grounded in eight production-grade machine learning models. Our findings demonstrate that for prediction accuracy when the sample-to-feature ratio is sufficient (n/p >= 78), Ridge, Lasso, and ElasticNet are nearly interchangeable. However, we find that Lasso recall is highly fragile under multicollinearity; at high condition numbers (kappa) and low SNR, Lasso recall collapses to 0.18 while ElasticNet maintains 0.93. Consequently, we advise practitioners against using Lasso or Post-Lasso OLS at high kappa with small sample sizes. The analysis concludes with an objective-driven decision guide to assist machine learning engineers in selecting the optimal scikit-learn-supported framework based on observable feature space attributes.

The problem of benign overfitting asks whether it is possible for a model to perfectly fit noisy training data and still generalize well. We study benign overfitting in two-layer leaky ReLU networks trained with the hinge loss on a binary classification task. We consider input data which can be decomposed into the sum of a common signal and a random noise component, which lie on subspaces orthogonal to one another. We characterize conditions on the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the model parameters giving rise to benign versus non-benign, or harmful, overfitting: in particular, if the SNR is high then benign overfitting occurs, conversely if the SNR is low then harmful overfitting occurs. We attribute both benign and non-benign overfitting to an approximate margin maximization property and show that leaky ReLU networks trained on hinge loss with gradient descent (GD) satisfy this property. In contrast to prior work we do not require the training data to be nearly orthogonal. Notably, for input dimension $d$ and training sample size $n$, while results in prior work require $d = \Omega(n^2 \log n)$, here we require only $d = \Omega(n)$.

Diffusion Transformers (DiT) have attracted significant attention in research. However, they suffer from a slow convergence rate.

Wefindalarge range of behavior that can be precisely characterized by a new measure ofconfounding strength.

We give a precise trade-off between the rank of the SVDs required and the radius of the ball in which we need to initialize the method.