To be consistent with accuracy definition, we denote the correctness ofstj for instance t as sim(stj,rt) = ( 2 distance(stj,rt))/ 2 where sim(stj,rt) is in the range [0,1] and distance(stj,rt) is in range [0, 2], 2 is the largest Euclidean distance in the probability simplex. Given a test dataset I, the correctness of a learner SLj on I can be denoted as 2 corrSLj = 1n Pn t=1sim(stj,rt). In this section, we define multiple metrics for consistency, accuracy, and correct-consistency in detail. Figure 1 shows the metrics computation in our experiments. We have created a git repository for this work and will be posted upon the acceptance and publicationofthiswork.

However, local attention limits the receptive field to one-hop neighbors.

Such direct sim2real transfer is not guaranteed to succeed, however, and in cases where it fails, it is unclear how to best utilize the simulator. In this work, we show that in many regimes, while direct sim2real transfer may fail, we can utilize the simulator to learn a set of exploratory policies which enable efficient exploration in the real world.

In many search applications related to passage retrieval, text entailment, and sub-graph search, the query and each'document' is a set of elements, with a document

Recently, federated multi-view clustering (FedMVC) has emerged to explore cluster structures in multi-view data distributed on multiple clients. Many existing approaches tend to assume that clients are isomorphic and all of them belong to either single-view clients or multi-view clients.

Weheldoutavalidation setfromthetraining set,andusedthisvalidation settoselecttheL2 regularization hyperparameter,which weselected from 45logarithmically spaced values between 10 6 and 105, applied to the sum of the per-example losses. Because the optimization problem is convex, we used the previous weights as a warm start as we increased theL2 regularization hyperparameter. Wemeasured eithertop-1ormean per-class accuracy, depending on which was suggested by the dataset creators. A.3 Fine-tuning In our fine-tuning experiments in Table 2, we used standard ImageNet-style data augmentationand trained for 20,000 steps with SGD with momentum of0.9 and cosine annealing [ 20]without restarts. Each curve represents a different model.