Goto

Collaborating Authors

 sharp convergence rate


The rate of convergence of Bregman proximal methods: Local geometry vs. regularity vs. sharpness

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

We examine the last-iterate convergence rate of Bregman proximal methods - from mirror descent to mirror-prox and its optimistic variants - as a function of the local geometry induced by the prox-mapping defining the method. For generality, we focus on local solutions of constrained, non-monotone variational inequalities, and we show that the convergence rate of a given method depends sharply on its associated Legendre exponent, a notion that measures the growth rate of the underlying Bregman function (Euclidean, entropic, or other) near a solution. In particular, we show that boundary solutions exhibit a stark separation of regimes between methods with a zero and non-zero Legendre exponent: the former converge at a linear rate, while the latter converge, in general, sublinearly. This dichotomy becomes even more pronounced in linearly constrained problems where methods with entropic regularization achieve a linear convergence rate along sharp directions, compared to convergence in a finite number of steps under Euclidean regularization.


Sharp Convergence Rates for Langevin Dynamics in the Nonconvex Setting

arXiv.org Machine Learning

We study the problem of sampling from a distribution where the negative logarithm of the target density is $L$-smooth everywhere and $m$-strongly convex outside a ball of radius $R$, but potentially non-convex inside this ball. We study both overdamped and underdamped Langevin MCMC and prove upper bounds on the time required to obtain a sample from a distribution that is within $\epsilon$ of the target distribution in $1$-Wasserstein distance. For the first-order method (overdamped Langevin MCMC), the time complexity is $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}\left(e^{cLR^2}\frac{d}{\epsilon^2}\right)$, where $d$ is the dimension of the underlying space. For the second-order method (underdamped Langevin MCMC), the time complexity is $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}\left(e^{cLR^2}\frac{\sqrt{d}}{\epsilon}\right)$ for some explicit positive constant $c$. Surprisingly, the convergence rate is only polynomial in the dimension $d$ and the target accuracy $\epsilon$. It is however exponential in the problem parameter $LR^2$, which is a measure of non-logconcavity of the target distribution.


Sharp Convergence Rates for Forward Regression in High-Dimensional Sparse Linear Models

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Forward regression is a statistical model selection and estimation procedure which inductively selects covariates that add predictive power into a working statistical regression model. Once a model is selected, unknown regression parameters are estimated by least squares. This paper analyzes forward regression in high-dimensional sparse linear models. Probabilistic bounds for prediction error norm and number of selected covariates are proved. The analysis in this paper gives sharp rates and does not require beta-min or irrepresentability conditions.