However, FL is usually computationally intensive.

Split Federated Learning (SFL) is a distributed machine learning paradigm that combines federated learning and split learning. In SFL, a neural network is partitioned at a cut layer, with the initial layers deployed on clients and remaining layers on a training server. There are two main variants of SFL: SFL-V1 where the training server maintains separate server-side models for each client, and SFL-V2 where the training server maintains a single shared model for all clients. While existing studies have focused on algorithm development for SFL, a comprehensive quantitative analysis of how the cut layer selection affects model performance remains unexplored. This paper addresses this gap by providing numerical and theoretical analysis of SFL performance and convergence relative to cut layer selection. We find that SFL-V1 is relatively invariant to the choice of cut layer, which is consistent with our theoretical results. Numerical experiments on four datasets and two neural networks show that the cut layer selection significantly affects the performance of SFL-V2. Moreover, SFL-V2 with an appropriate cut layer selection outperforms FedAvg on heterogeneous data.

Split federated learning (SFL) is a recent distributed approach for collaborative model training among multiple clients. In SFL, a global model is typically split into two parts, where clients train one part in a parallel federated manner, and a main server trains the other. Despite the recent research on SFL algorithm development, the convergence analysis of SFL is missing in the literature, and this paper aims to fill this gap. The analysis of SFL can be more challenging than that of federated learning (FL), due to the potential dual-paced updates at the clients and the main server. We provide convergence analysis of SFL for strongly convex and general convex objectives on heterogeneous data. The convergence rates are $O(1/T)$ and $O(1/\sqrt[3]{T})$, respectively, where $T$ denotes the total number of rounds for SFL training. We further extend the analysis to non-convex objectives and where some clients may be unavailable during training. Numerical experiments validate our theoretical results and show that SFL outperforms FL and split learning (SL) when data is highly heterogeneous across a large number of clients.