Protecting individual privacy is essential across research domains, from socio-economic surveys to big-tech user data. This need is particularly acute in healthcare, where analyses often involve sensitive patient information. A typical example is comparing treatment efficacy across hospitals or ensuring consistency in diagnostic laboratory calibrations, both requiring privacy-preserving statistical procedures. However, standard equivalence testing procedures for differences in proportions or means, commonly used to assess average equivalence, can inadvertently disclose sensitive information. To address this problem, we develop differentially private equivalence testing procedures that rely on simulation-based calibration, as the finite-sample distribution is analytically intractable. Our approach introduces a unified framework, termed DP-TOST, for conducting differentially private equivalence testing of both means and proportions. Through numerical simulations and real-world applications, we demonstrate that the proposed method maintains type-I error control at the nominal level and achieves power comparable to its non-private counterpart as the privacy budget and/or sample size increases, while ensuring strong privacy guarantees. These findings establish a reliable and practical framework for privacy-preserving equivalence testing in high-stakes fields such as healthcare, among others.

Efficient and scalable non-parametric or semi-parametric regression analysis and density estimation are of crucial importance to the fields of statistics and machine learning. However, available methods are limited in their ability to handle large-scale data. We address this issue by developing a novel coreset construction for multivariate conditional transformation models (MCTMs) to enhance their scalability and training efficiency. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first coresets for semi-parametric distributional models. Our approach yields substantial data reduction via importance sampling. It ensures with high probability that the log-likelihood remains within multiplicative error bounds of $(1\pm\varepsilon)$ and thereby maintains statistical model accuracy. Compared to conventional full-parametric models, where coresets have been incorporated before, our semi-parametric approach exhibits enhanced adaptability, particularly in scenarios where complex distributions and non-linear relationships are present, but not fully understood. To address numerical problems associated with normalizing logarithmic terms, we follow a geometric approximation based on the convex hull of input data. This ensures feasible, stable, and accurate inference in scenarios involving large amounts of data. Numerical experiments demonstrate substantially improved computational efficiency when handling large and complex datasets, thus laying the foundation for a broad range of applications within the statistics and machine learning communities.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as decision-support tools in data-constrained scientific workflows, where correctness and validity are critical. However, evaluation practices often emphasize stability or reproducibility across repeated runs. While these properties are desirable, stability alone does not guar- antee agreement with statistical ground truth when such references are available. We introduce a controlled behavioral evaluation framework that explicitly sep- arates four dimensions of LLM decision-making: stability, correctness, prompt sensitivity, and output validity under fixed statistical inputs. We evaluate multi- ple LLMs using a statistical gene prioritization task derived from differential ex- pression analysis across prompt regimes involving strict and relaxed significance thresholds, borderline ranking scenarios, and minor wording variations. Our ex- periments show that LLMs can exhibit near-perfect run-to-run stability while sys- tematically diverging from statistical ground truth, over-selecting under relaxed thresholds, responding sharply to minor prompt wording changes, or producing syntactically plausible gene identifiers absent from the input table. Although sta- bility reflects robustness across repeated runs, it does not guarantee agreement with statistical ground truth in structured scientific decision tasks. These findings highlight the importance of explicit ground-truth validation and output validity checks when deploying LLMs in automated or semi-automated scientific work- flows.

We develop a method for comparing hierarchical image representations in terms of their ability to explain perceptual sensitivity in humans. Specifically, we utilize Fisher information to establish a model-derived prediction of sensitivity to local perturbations of an image. For a given image, we compute the eigenvectors of the Fisher information matrix with largest and smallest eigenvalues, corresponding to the model-predicted most-and least-noticeable image distortions, respectively. For human subjects, we then measure the amount of each distortion that can be reliably detected when added to the image. We use this method to test the ability of a variety of representations to mimic human perceptual sensitivity. We find that the early layers of VGG16, a deep neural network optimized for object recognition, provide a better match to human perception than later layers, and a better match than a 4-stage convolutional neural network (CNN) trained on a database of human ratings of distorted image quality. On the other hand, we find that simple models of early visual processing, incorporating one or more stages of local gain control, trained on the same database of distortion ratings, provide substantially better predictions of human sensitivity than either the CNN, or any combination of layers of VGG16.

We introduce the Integrated Tsallis Combination (ITC), a hybrid impurity measure for decision tree learning that combines normalized Tsallis entropy with an exponential polarization component. While many existing measures sacrifice theoretical soundness for computational efficiency or vice versa, ITC provides a mathematically principled framework that balances both aspects. The core innovation lies in the complementarity between Tsallis entropy's information-theoretic foundations and the polarization component's sensitivity to distributional asymmetry. We establish key theoretical properties-concavity under explicit parameter conditions, proper boundary conditions, and connections to classical measures-and provide a rigorous justification for the hybridization strategy. Through an extensive comparative evaluation on seven benchmark datasets comparing 23 impurity measures with five-fold repetition, we show that simple parametric measures (Tsallis $α=0.5$) achieve the highest average accuracy ($91.17\%$), while ITC variants yield competitive results ($88.38-89.16\%$) with strong theoretical guarantees. Statistical analysis (Friedman test: $χ^2=3.89$, $p=0.692$) reveals no significant global differences among top performers, indicating practical equivalence for many applications. ITC's value resides in its solid theoretical grounding-proven concavity under suitable conditions, flexible parameterization ($α$, $β$, $γ$), and computational efficiency $O(K)$-making it a rigorous, generalizable alternative when theoretical guarantees are paramount. We provide guidelines for measure selection based on application priorities and release an open-source implementation to foster reproducibility and further research.

The ever-increasing number of parameters in deep neural networks poses challenges for memory-limited applications. Regularize-and-prune methods aim at meeting these challenges by sparsifying the network weights. In this context we quantify the output sensitivity to the parameters (i.e.

While the inverse sensitivity mechanism was shown to be instance optimal, it was only with respect to a class of unbiased mechanisms such that the most likely outcome matches the underlying data.

Understanding the theoretical foundations of attention mechanisms remains challenging due to their complex, non-linear dynamics. This work reveals a fundamental trade-off in the learning dynamics of linearized attention. Using a linearized attention mechanism with exact correspondence to a data-dependent Gram-induced kernel, both empirical and theoretical analysis through the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) framework shows that linearized attention does not converge to its infinite-width NTK limit, even at large widths. A spectral amplification result establishes this formally: the attention transformation cubes the Gram matrix's condition number, requiring width $m = Ω(κ^6)$ for convergence, a threshold that exceeds any practical width for natural image datasets. This non-convergence is characterized through influence malleability, the capacity to dynamically alter reliance on training examples. Attention exhibits 6--9$\times$ higher malleability than ReLU networks, with dual implications: its data-dependent kernel can reduce approximation error by aligning with task structure, but this same sensitivity increases susceptibility to adversarial manipulation of training data. These findings suggest that attention's power and vulnerability share a common origin in its departure from the kernel regime.

Data privacy is important in the AI era, and differential privacy (DP) is one of the golden solutions. However, DP is typically applicable only if data have a bounded underlying distribution. We address this limitation by leveraging second-moment information from a small amount of public data. We propose Public-moment-guided Truncation (PMT), which transforms private data using the public second-moment matrix and applies a principled truncation whose radius depends only on non-private quantities: data dimension and sample size. This transformation yields a well-conditioned second-moment matrix, enabling its inversion with a significantly strengthened ability to resist the DP noise. Furthermore, we demonstrate the applicability of PMT by using penalized and generalized linear regressions. Specifically, we design new loss functions and algorithms, ensuring that solutions in the transformed space can be mapped back to the original domain. We have established improvements in the models' DP estimation through theoretical error bounds, robustness guarantees, and convergence results, attributing the gains to the conditioning effect of PMT. Experiments on synthetic and real datasets confirm that PMT substantially improves the accuracy and stability of DP models.

Results averaged over ResNet18 and ResNet50.