Goto

Collaborating Authors

 scispace


GPT vs Human for Scientific Reviews: A Dual Source Review on Applications of ChatGPT in Science

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

However, at the present time, they lack the required deep understanding of complex methodologies, they have difficulty in evaluating innovative claims, and they are unable to assess ethical issues and conflicts of interest. Herein, we consider 13 GPT-related papers across different scientific domains, reviewed by a human reviewer and SciSpace, a large language model, with the reviews evaluated by three distinct types of evaluators, namely GPT-3.5, a crowd panel, and GPT-4. We found that 50% of SciSpace's responses to objective questions align with those of a human reviewer, with GPT-4 (informed evaluator) often rating the human reviewer higher in accuracy, and SciSpace higher in structure, clarity, and completeness. In subjective questions, the uninformed evaluators (GPT-3.5 and crowd panel) showed varying preferences between SciSpace and human responses, with the crowd panel showing a preference for the human responses. However, GPT-4 rated them equally in accuracy and structure but favored SciSpace for completeness.


21 AI tools that will transform your productivity forever

#artificialintelligence

Decktopus: With 100,000 users worldwide, Decktopus is a presentation tool helping businesses grow their online presence in the least complicated way and within a short period of time through editable, interactive, and professional templates.The tool consists of more than 100 templates that are ready to use. All you need to bring is your content! Decktopus allows you to both share your documents, presentations, and proposals online, or embed them on your website & email directly. Link: Decktopus Promptpal: The destination for the best prompts for ChatGPT, Google Bard, Dall-E, Midjourney, and more. Quinv is a concise storytelling format that combines various types of multimedia into a single interactive experience.