Artificial intelligence (AI) systems increasingly inform medical decision-making, yet concerns about algorithmic bias and inequitable outcomes persist, particularly for historically marginalized populations. This paper introduces the concept of Predictive Representativity (PR), a framework of fairness auditing that shifts the focus from the composition of the data set to outcomes-level equity. Through a case study in dermatology, we evaluated AI-based skin cancer classifiers trained on the widely used HAM10000 dataset and on an independent clinical dataset (BOSQUE Test set) from Colombia. Our analysis reveals substantial performance disparities by skin phototype, with classifiers consistently underperforming for individuals with darker skin, despite proportional sampling in the source data. We argue that representativity must be understood not as a static feature of datasets but as a dynamic, context-sensitive property of model predictions. PR operationalizes this shift by quantifying how reliably models generalize fairness across subpopulations and deployment contexts. We further propose an External Transportability Criterion that formalizes the thresholds for fairness generalization. Our findings highlight the ethical imperative for post-hoc fairness auditing, transparency in dataset documentation, and inclusive model validation pipelines. This work offers a scalable tool for diagnosing structural inequities in AI systems, contributing to discussions on equity, interpretability, and data justice and fostering a critical re-evaluation of fairness in data-driven healthcare.

With the exponential growth of time series data across diverse domains, there is a pressing need for effective analysis tools. Time series clustering is important for identifying patterns in these datasets. However, prevailing methods often encounter obstacles in maintaining data relationships and ensuring interpretability. We present Graphint, an innovative system based on the $k$-Graph methodology that addresses these challenges. Graphint integrates a robust time series clustering algorithm with an interactive tool for comparison and interpretation. More precisely, our system allows users to compare results against competing approaches, identify discriminative subsequences within specified datasets, and visualize the critical information utilized by $k$-Graph to generate outputs. Overall, Graphint offers a comprehensive solution for extracting actionable insights from complex temporal datasets.

These automated decision frameworks have demonstrated various unwanted consequences as a result of biased data [11, 66-68, 84, 86, 109]. Oftentimes these systems are trained on samples (datasets) from a larger population. Biased results can arise if the sample does not accurately represent the target population, or if there is a lack of sufficient representation for subgroups within the data. While the literature of data bias in machine Learning and artificial intelligence (AI) systems is rich [99], there exists only limited work on the connections between data representativity and AI systems. Terms like representative sample are used ubiquitously in the literature, often without further specification on the details or effects of this representativity. This paper analyzes and surveys data representativity in scientific literature relating to machine learning and AI systems by investigating how different notions of representativity are used and what effects adhering to different notions of data representativity has in relation to appropriate inference. The term representative sample is an overloaded term and a generally accepted definition of what constitutes a representative sample (subset of observations) is hard to find in the literature. A few examples demonstrate that at least a couple of definitions of representative sample exist. The most general definition we found is from D'Excelle (2014) and states ""Representative sampling" is a type of statistical sampling that allows us to use data from a sample to make conclusions that are representative for the population from which the sample is taken."

Data summarizations are a valuable tool to derive knowledge from large data streams and have proven their usefulness in a great number of applications. Summaries can be found by optimizing submodular functions. These functions map subsets of data to real values, which indicate their "representativeness" and which should be maximized to find a diverse summary of the underlying data. In this paper, we studied Exemplar-based clustering as a submodular function and provide a GPU algorithm to cope with its high computational complexity. We show, that our GPU implementation provides speedups of up to 72x using single-precision and up to 452x using half-precision computation compared to conventional CPU algorithms. We also show, that the GPU algorithm not only provides remarkable runtime benefits with workstation-grade GPUs but also with low-power embedded computation units for which speedups of up to 35x are possible. Furthermore, we apply our algorithm to real-world data from injection molding manufacturing processes and discuss how found summaries help with steering this specific process to cut costs and reduce the manufacturing of bad parts. Beyond pure speedup considerations, we show, that our approach can provide summaries within reasonable time frames for this kind of industrial, real-world data.

Incorporating fairness constructs into machine learning algorithms is a topic of much societal importance and recent interest. Clustering, a fundamental task in unsupervised learning that manifests across a number of web data scenarios, has also been subject of attention within fair ML research. In this paper, we develop a novel notion of fairness in clustering, called representativity fairness. Representativity fairness is motivated by the need to alleviate disparity across objects' proximity to their assigned cluster representatives, to aid fairer decision making. We illustrate the importance of representativity fairness in real-world decision making scenarios involving clustering and provide ways of quantifying objects' representativity and fairness over it. We develop a new clustering formulation, RFKM, that targets to optimize for representativity fairness along with clustering quality. Inspired by the $K$-Means framework, RFKM incorporates novel loss terms to formulate an objective function. The RFKM objective and optimization approach guides it towards clustering configurations that yield higher representativity fairness. Through an empirical evaluation over a variety of public datasets, we establish the effectiveness of our method. We illustrate that we are able to significantly improve representativity fairness at only marginal impact to clustering quality.