representation space
- North America > United States > Montana (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia (0.04)
- Asia > China > Heilongjiang Province > Harbin (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.67)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area (0.93)
- Health & Medicine > Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology (0.68)
- Health & Medicine > Diagnostic Medicine > Imaging (0.46)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Los Angeles (0.14)
- North America > United States > New York (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks (0.69)
- Information Technology > Communications (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots > Robot Planning & Action (0.48)
- Information Technology > Sensing and Signal Processing > Image Processing (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.87)
- North America > United States > Texas (0.04)
- North America > United States > North Carolina (0.04)
- Europe > Sweden > Västmanland County > Västerås (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- Europe > Poland > Masovia Province > Warsaw (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Barbara County > Santa Barbara (0.04)
Supplementary material for " Improving neural network representations using human similarity judgments " Anonymous Author(s) Affiliation Address email A Experimental details 1 A.1 Model features 2
Figure A.1: Among all hyperparameter combinations considered in our grid search, a combination of ( We used a compute time of approximately 5600 CPU-hours of 2.90GHz Intel Xeon Gold In this section, we outline our anomaly detection experimental setting in more detail. Given a dataset (e.g., CIFAR-10) with In contrast to the "one-vs-rest" setting, in LOO we define one class of the In both "one-vs-rest" and LOO AD settings, we evaluate model representations in the following way: We show the pairs of items that change the most in distance in Table B.1. "stethoscope", which are semantically unrelated but perhaps have some slight visual similarity, tend We show the results in Fig. B.1. Table B.1: Distances between pairs of individual items from THINGS, ranked by the relative change in cosine The top items move much closer together under naive alignment, while the bottom ones move much farther apart. Figure B.1: How does the global structure of the representations change after alignment?
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Vancouver (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Long Beach (0.14)
- Europe > Germany > Berlin (0.04)
- (10 more...)