Discrete automated processes in industrial and cyber-physical systems often exhibit a repetitive structure in which successive repetitions follow a common trajectory while differing in duration, amplitude, and fine-scale dynamics. Such \emph{approximately periodic} behavior poses a challenge for Gaussian Processes (GP) modeling: strictly periodic models suppress inter-repetition variability, while non-periodic models fail to capture the strong structural regularities required for generation. In this work, we propose a stochastic generative model for approximately periodic time series. The model is based on a GP whose posterior is modulated by a novel kernel. Our approach decouples intra-repetition structure from inter-repetition variability through a two-stage construction which yields a generative distribution with a identical mean function across repetitions, while allowing smooth variation between repetitions. The modeling choices are supported by an implementation in which realistic synthetic trajectories are generated from toy datasets.

Confidence sequences based on test martingales provide time-uniform uncertainty quantification for the mean of bounded IID observations without parametric distributional assumptions. Their practical efficiency, however, depends strongly on the choice of martingale updates, and many existing constructions do not exploit prior information about plausible data-generating distributions or mean values. We propose a Bayes-assisted framework that uses a Bayesian working predictive model to adaptively construct confidence sequences. For each candidate mean and time point, the predictive distribution selects, among valid one-step martingale factors, the update maximising predictive expected log-growth; validity is therefore preserved even when the prior or working model is misspecified. We prove that if the predictive distribution is Wasserstein-consistent, the resulting procedure is asymptotically log-optimal, matching the per-sample log-growth of an oracle procedure with access to the true distribution. We instantiate the framework using robust predictives based on Dirichlet-process mixtures and Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood. Experiments on synthetic data, sequential best-arm identification for LLM evaluation, and prediction-powered inference show that informative priors can substantially reduce confidence-sequence width and sampling effort while retaining anytime-valid coverage.

A.1 Preliminary Study2 The basic GPT-2 model1 is trained from scratch on each corpus, which has 12 transformer blocks3 and 12 attention heads with 768 hidden dimensions. The Huggingface transformers [4] and Pytorch4 toolkit [2] are used to train the GPT-2 model in the distributed manner on A100 GPU server. The5 hyper-parameters during training are shown in Table 1.6 Hyper-parameter Value Optimization steps 100K Test interval 10K Dropout rate 0.1 Grad clipping 1.0 Learning rate 5e 5 Batch size 128 Maximum sequence length 256 Warmup steps 10K Learning scheduler Linear decay Random seed 0 Number of GPUs 4 Learning objective Cross-Entropy Loss Table 1: The hyper-parameters during GPT-2 training procedure. Most of the hyper-parameters for our proposed method are the same as that in Table 1 for better8 variable controlling. The specific hyper-parameters for our proposed method are the length of9 repetitive n-gram and its repetition dropout rate p, which are set as 2 and 0.6, respectively.10

Previous work [2, 1] has observed that standard training and greedy decoding usually cause models to generate consecutive repetitive texts. These consecutive repetitive texts are redundant and do not convey new information, which is avoided in human language. There are three types of consecutive repetitions: word-level, phrase-level and sentence-level. The phrase-level means that a phrase consisting of several words is repeated consecutively. The sentence in our paper refers to a sequence split by '.!?' is repeated consecutively 2. We calculate the ratio of consecutive repetition in a sequence x as follows.

The present study aims to investigate a cluster cleaning algorithm that is both computationally simple and capable of solving the PU classification when the SCAR condition is unsatisfied. A secondary objective of this study is to determine the robustness of the LassoJoint method to perturbations of the SCAR condition. In the first step of our algorithm, we obtain cleaning labels from 2-means clustering. Subsequently, we perform logistic regression on the cleaned data, assigning positive labels from the cleaning algorithm with additional true positive observations. The remaining observations are assigned the negative label. The proposed algorithm is evaluated by comparing 11 real data sets from machine learning repositories and a synthetic set. The findings obtained from this study demonstrate the efficacy of the clustering algorithm in scenarios where the SCAR condition is violated and further underscore the moderate robustness of the LassoJoint algorithm in this context.

Active Learning (AL) deals with identifying the most informative samples forlabeling to reduce data annotation costs for supervised learning tasks. ALresearch suffers from the fact that lifts from literature generalize poorly andthat only a small number of repetitions of experiments are conducted. To overcomethese obstacles, we propose CDALBench, the first active learning benchmarkwhich includes tasks in computer vision, natural language processing and tabularlearning. Furthermore, by providing an efficient, greedy oracle, CDALBenchcan be evaluated with 50 runs for each experiment. We show, that both thecross-domain character and a large amount of repetitions are crucial forsophisticated evaluation of AL research. Concretely, we show that thesuperiority of specific methods varies over the different domains, making itimportant to evaluate Active Learning with a cross-domain benchmark.Additionally, we show that having a large amount of runs is crucial. With onlyconducting three runs as often done in the literature, the superiority ofspecific methods can strongly vary with the specific runs. This effect is so strong, that, depending on the seed, even a well-established method's performance can be significantly better and significantlyworse than random for the same dataset.