reinforcementlearning
SupplementaryMaterialfor" HierarchicalAdaptive ValueEstimationforMulti-modalVisual ReinforcementLearning "
Section C describes the details of the experimental setup, including network architectures, hyperparameters,andhardwaredetails. Thisoutcomeemphasizes the necessity of feature interaction or feature fusion to tackle intricate situations. Furthermore, an amalgamation of feature fusion and value fusion can offer better performance. This adjustment allows us to evaluate the robustness and adaptability of our approach in handling a larger number of vehicles in the environment. As we increase the number of vehicles on the road, Fig. A2 (a) clearly indicates that HAVE consistently delivers the highest performance. The training and testing curves of HAVE and other comparable methods are given in A4.
SupplementaryMaterialforRethinkingValue FunctionLearningforGeneralizationin ReinforcementLearning
Then,wecalculatethe mean stiffness of the value network across all state pairs and report its average computed over all trainingepochs. Eachagentis trained on 200 training levels for 25M environment steps. The mean and standard deviation are computedover10differentruns. Morespecifically,wecollect100 training episodes throughout the training and evaluate the value network prediction for the initial stateofeachtrajectory. Each agent is trained on 200 training levels for 25M environment steps.