Goto

Collaborating Authors

 regularization factor


Decentralized Machine Learning with Centralized Performance Guarantees via Gibbs Algorithms

Bermudez, Yaiza, Perlaza, Samir, Esnaola, Iñaki

arXiv.org Machine Learning

In this paper, it is shown, for the first time, that centralized performance is achievable in decentralized learning without sharing the local datasets. Specifically, when clients adopt an empirical risk minimization with relative-entropy regularization (ERM-RER) learning framework and a forward-backward communication between clients is established, it suffices to share the locally obtained Gibbs measures to achieve the same performance as that of a centralized ERM-RER with access to all the datasets. The core idea is that the Gibbs measure produced by client~$k$ is used, as reference measure, by client~$k+1$. This effectively establishes a principled way to encode prior information through a reference measure. In particular, achieving centralized performance in the decentralized setting requires a specific scaling of the regularization factors with the local sample sizes. Overall, this result opens the door to novel decentralized learning paradigms that shift the collaboration strategy from sharing data to sharing the local inductive bias via the reference measures over the set of models.



Generalization Error of $f$-Divergence Stabilized Algorithms via Duality

Daunas, Francisco, Esnaola, Iñaki, Perlaza, Samir M., Aminian, Gholamali

arXiv.org Machine Learning

The solution to empirical risk minimization with $f$-divergence regularization (ERM-$f$DR) is extended to constrained optimization problems, establishing conditions for equivalence between the solution and constraints. A dual formulation of ERM-$f$DR is introduced, providing a computationally efficient method to derive the normalization function of the ERM-$f$DR solution. This dual approach leverages the Legendre-Fenchel transform and the implicit function theorem, enabling explicit characterizations of the generalization error for general algorithms under mild conditions, and another for ERM-$f$DR solutions.


Kernel Stochastic Configuration Networks for Nonlinear Regression

Chen, Yongxuan, Wang, Dianhui

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Stochastic configuration networks (SCNs), as a class of randomized learner models, are featured by its way of random parameters assignment in the light of a supervisory mechanism, resulting in the universal approximation property at algorithmic level. This paper presents a kernel version of SCNs, termed KSCNs, aiming to enhance model's representation learning capability and performance stability. The random bases of a built SCN model can be used to span a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS), followed by our proposed algorithm for constructing KSCNs. It is shown that the data distribution in the reconstructive space is favorable for regression solving and the proposed KSCN learner models hold the universal approximation property. Three benchmark datasets including two industrial datasets are used in this study for performance evaluation. Experimental results with comparisons against existing solutions clearly demonstrate that the proposed KSCN remarkably outperforms the original SCNs and some typical kernel methods for resolving nonlinear regression problems in terms of the learning performance, the model's stability and robustness with respect to the kernel parameter settings.



ProSparse: Introducing and Enhancing Intrinsic Activation Sparsity within Large Language Models

Song, Chenyang, Han, Xu, Zhang, Zhengyan, Hu, Shengding, Shi, Xiyu, Li, Kuai, Chen, Chen, Liu, Zhiyuan, Li, Guangli, Yang, Tao, Sun, Maosong

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Activation sparsity refers to the existence of considerable weakly-contributed elements among activation outputs. As a prevalent property of the models using the ReLU activation function, activation sparsity has been proven a promising paradigm to boost model inference efficiency. Nevertheless, most large language models (LLMs) adopt activation functions without intrinsic activation sparsity (e.g., GELU and Swish). Some recent efforts have explored introducing ReLU or its variants as the substitutive activation function to help LLMs achieve activation sparsity and inference acceleration, but few can simultaneously obtain high sparsity and comparable model performance. This paper introduces a simple and effective sparsification method named "ProSparse" to push LLMs for higher activation sparsity while maintaining comparable performance. Specifically, after substituting the activation function of LLMs with ReLU, ProSparse adopts progressive sparsity regularization with a factor smoothly increasing along the multi-stage sine curves. This can enhance activation sparsity and mitigate performance degradation by avoiding radical shifts in activation distributions. With ProSparse, we obtain high sparsity of 89.32% for LLaMA2-7B, 88.80% for LLaMA2-13B, and 87.89% for end-size MiniCPM-1B, respectively, achieving comparable performance to their original Swish-activated versions. These present the most sparsely activated models among open-source LLaMA versions and competitive end-size models, considerably surpassing ReluLLaMA-7B (66.98%) and ReluLLaMA-13B (71.56%). Our inference acceleration experiments further demonstrate the significant practical acceleration potential of LLMs with higher activation sparsity, obtaining up to 4.52$\times$ inference speedup.


DynaVINS: A Visual-Inertial SLAM for Dynamic Environments

Song, Seungwon, Lim, Hyungtae, Lee, Alex Junho, Myung, Hyun

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Visual inertial odometry and SLAM algorithms are widely used in various fields, such as service robots, drones, and autonomous vehicles. Most of the SLAM algorithms are based on assumption that landmarks are static. However, in the real-world, various dynamic objects exist, and they degrade the pose estimation accuracy. In addition, temporarily static objects, which are static during observation but move when they are out of sight, trigger false positive loop closings. To overcome these problems, we propose a novel visual-inertial SLAM framework, called DynaVINS, which is robust against both dynamic objects and temporarily static objects. In our framework, we first present a robust bundle adjustment that could reject the features from dynamic objects by leveraging pose priors estimated by the IMU preintegration. Then, a keyframe grouping and a multi-hypothesis-based constraints grouping methods are proposed to reduce the effect of temporarily static objects in the loop closing. Subsequently, we evaluated our method in a public dataset that contains numerous dynamic objects. Finally, the experimental results corroborate that our DynaVINS has promising performance compared with other state-of-the-art methods by successfully rejecting the effect of dynamic and temporarily static objects. Our code is available at https://github.com/url-kaist/dynaVINS.


Deep reinforcement learning for smart calibration of radio telescopes

Yatawatta, Sarod, Avruch, Ian M.

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Modern radio telescopes produce unprecedented amounts of data, which are passed through many processing pipelines before the delivery of scientific results. Hyperparameters of these pipelines need to be tuned by hand to produce optimal results. Because many thousands of observations are taken during a lifetime of a telescope and because each observation will have its unique settings, the fine tuning of pipelines is a tedious task. In order to automate this process of hyperparameter selection in data calibration pipelines, we introduce the use of reinforcement learning. We use a reinforcement learning technique called twin delayed deep deterministic policy gradient (TD3) to train an autonomous agent to perform this fine tuning. For the sake of generalization, we consider the pipeline to be a black-box system where only an interpreted state of the pipeline is used by the agent. The autonomous agent trained in this manner is able to determine optimal settings for diverse observations and is therefore able to perform 'smart' calibration, minimizing the need for human intervention.


Discount Factor as a Regularizer in Reinforcement Learning

Amit, Ron, Meir, Ron, Ciosek, Kamil

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Specifying a Reinforcement Learning (RL) task involves choosing a suitable planning horizon, which is typically modeled by a discount factor. It is known that applying RL algorithms with a lower discount factor can act as a regularizer, improving performance in the limited data regime. Yet the exact nature of this regularizer has not been investigated. In this work, we fill in this gap. For several Temporal-Difference (TD) learning methods, we show an explicit equivalence between using a reduced discount factor and adding an explicit regularization term to the algorithm's loss. Motivated by the equivalence, we empirically study this technique compared to standard $L_2$ regularization by extensive experiments in discrete and continuous domains, using tabular and functional representations. Our experiments suggest the regularization effectiveness is strongly related to properties of the available data, such as size, distribution, and mixing rate.


Representation of Federated Learning via Worst-Case Robust Optimization Theory

Parsaeefard, Saeedeh, Tabrizian, Iman, Garcia, Alberto Leon

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Federated learning (FL) is a distributed learning approach where a set of end-user devices participate in the learning process by acting on their isolated local data sets. Here, we process local data sets of users where worst-case optimization theory is used to reformulate the FL problem where the impact of local data sets in training phase is considered as an uncertain function bounded in a closed uncertainty region. This representation allows us to compare the performance of FL with its centralized counterpart, and to replace the uncertain function with a concept of protection functions leading to more tractable formulation. The latter supports applying a regularization factor in each user cost function in FL to reach a better performance. We evaluated our model using the MNIST data set versus the protection function parameters, e.g., regularization factors.