readout
- Information Technology > Sensing and Signal Processing > Image Processing (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (0.67)
Retrospective for the Dynamic Sensorium Competition for predicting large-scale mouse primary visual cortex activity from videos
Understanding how biological visual systems process information is challenging because of the nonlinear relationship between visual input and neuronal responses. Artificial neural networks allow computational neuroscientists to create predictive models that connect biological and machine vision. Machine learning has benefited tremendously from benchmarks that compare different models on the same task under standardized conditions. However, there was no standardized benchmark to identify state-of-the-art dynamic models of the mouse visual system. To address this gap, we established the SENSORIUM 2023 Benchmark Competition with dynamic input, featuring a new large-scale dataset from the primary visual cortex of ten mice.
- Europe > Germany > Lower Saxony > Gottingen (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Stanford (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Baden-Württemberg > Tübingen Region > Tübingen (0.04)
- (9 more...)
d921c3c762b1522c475ac8fc0811bb0f-AuthorFeedback.pdf
We wish to thank all of the reviewers for their time and thorough reading of our paper! We appreciate the reviewer's suggestions regarding clarity. We have added the suggested summary sentence "the key We started with binary sentiment classification, but are actively working on more tasks. RNN hidden states onto the top two PCs for two different input sequences that differ only by two tokens (replacing ' The trajectories start out the same as the initial tokens are identical. We have added a footnote noting this in the main text.
- Europe > Germany > Baden-Württemberg > Tübingen Region > Tübingen (0.05)
- North America > United States > Texas > Harris County > Houston (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Lower Saxony > Gottingen (0.14)
- South America > Chile > Santiago Metropolitan Region > Santiago Province > Santiago (0.05)
- North America > United States > Texas > Harris County > Houston (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Baden-Württemberg > Tübingen Region > Tübingen (0.04)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area > Neurology (1.00)
- Information Technology (0.68)
- Europe > Germany > Hamburg (0.04)
- Africa > Comoros > Grande Comore > Moroni (0.04)
- North America > United States > District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.14)
- North America > United States > Michigan (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Alameda County > Berkeley (0.04)
- Health & Medicine > Diagnostic Medicine > Imaging (1.00)
- Health & Medicine > Health Care Technology (0.89)
Supplementary information 1 Simulation parameters
All simulations were based on pytorch [5]. For the nonlinear neuroscience tasks, we applied the gradient descent method "Adam" [4] to the recurrent weights W as well as to the input and output vectors mi, wi. We checked that our results did not depend qualitatively on the choice of the "Adam" algorithm over plain gradient descent; however, training converged more easily for this choice of algorithm. We also checked that restricting training to W only (as for the simple model) did not alter our results qualitatively (although, with this restriction, training on the Romo task for small values of g did not converge). Code for reproducing our results can be found on https://github.com/frschu/neurips_