In an episode of the satirical British political sitcom Yes, Prime Minister from the 1980s, Sir Humphrey Appleby once explained to Bernard Woolley (two of the characters) how it is possible to get contradictory polling results by asking a series of leading questions beforehand. The polling discussed in the episode concerns whether the public is for or against the reintroduction of national service. Recently, the leading questions outlined by Appleby were put to the public by the market research and polling giant Ipsos, the findings of which have been made public to raise awareness of the fact that people can be misled by means of a such questions [1]. The actual experiment conducted by Ipsos is explained on their web site: "Ipsos interviewed a representative quota sample of 2,158 adults aged 16-75 in Great Britain. Half saw the'Sample A' questions, reflecting a positive view about national service. Half saw'Sample B', reflecting a negative view."

This paper presents Sparse Tensor Classifier (STC), a supervised classification algorithm for categorical data inspired by the notion of superposition of states in quantum physics. By regarding an observation as a superposition of features, we introduce the concept of wave-particle duality in machine learning and propose a generalized framework that unifies the classical and the quantum probability. We show that STC possesses a wide range of desirable properties not available in most other machine learning methods but it is at the same time exceptionally easy to comprehend and use. Empirical evaluation of STC on structured data and text classification demonstrates that our methodology achieves state-of-theart performances compared to both standard classifiers and deep learning, at the additional benefit of requiring minimal data pre-processing and hyper-parameter tuning. Moreover, STC provides a native explanation of its predictions both for single instances and for each target label globally. All the code is released at https://sparsetensorclassifier.org

An approach is presented treating decision theory as a probabilistic theory based on quantum techniques. Accurate definitions are given and thorough analysis is accomplished for the quantum probabilities describing the choice between separate alternatives, sequential alternatives characterizing conditional quantum probabilities, and behavioral quantum probabilities taking into account rational-irrational duality of decision making. The comparison between quantum and classical probabilities is explained. The analysis demonstrates that quantum probabilities serve as an essentially more powerful tool of characterizing various decision-making situations including the influence of psychological behavioral effects.

Categorization is a significant task in decision-making, which is a key part of human behavior. An interference effect is caused by categorization in some cases, which breaks the total probability principle. A negation quantum model (NQ model) is developed in this article to predict the interference. Taking the advantage of negation to bring more information in the distribution from a different perspective, the proposed model is a combination of the negation of a probability distribution and the quantum decision model. Information of the phase contained in quantum probability and the special calculation method to it can easily represented the interference effect. The results of the proposed NQ model is closely to the real experiment data and has less error than the existed models.

The mathematics of quantum mechanics has been viewed and analyzed from a huge variety of different perspectives, each shedding light on different subtleties of its underlying structure and its connection to our everyday reality. Here we add an additional thread to this conceptual polyphony, demonstrating a close connection between fuzzy paraconsistent logic and quantum probabilities. This connection suggests new variations on existing interpretations of quantum reality and measurement. It also provides some tantalizing connections between the probabilistic and fuzzy logic used in modern AI systems and quantum probabilistic reasoning, which may have implications for quantum-computing implementations of logical inference based AI. The ideas here arose as a spinoff from the work reported in [Goe21], which uses a variety of paraconsistent intuitionistic logic called Constructible Duality (CD) Logic as a means for giving a rigorous logic foundation to the PLN (Probabilistic Logic Networks) logic [GIGH08] that has been used in the OpenCog AI project [GPG13a, GPG13b] for well over a decade now.

Counting the number of clusters, when these clusters overlap significantly is a challenging problem in machine learning. We argue that a purely mathematical quantum theory, formulated using the path integral technique, when applied to non-physics modeling leads to non-physics quantum theories that are statistical in nature. We show that a quantum theory can be a more robust statistical theory to separate data to count overlapping clusters. The theory is also confirmed from data simulations.This works identify how quantum theory can be effective in counting clusters and hope to inspire the field to further apply such techniques.

Algorithmic probability has shown some promise in dealing with the probability problem in the Everett interpretation, since it provides an objective, single-case probability measure. Many find the Everettian cosmology to be overly extravagant, however, and algorithmic probability has also provided improved models of subjective probability and Bayesian reasoning. I attempt here to generalize algorithmic Everettianism to more Bayesian and subjectivist interpretations. I present a general framework for applying generative probability, of which algorithmic probability can be considered a special case. I apply this framework to two commonly vexing thought experiments that have immediate application to quantum probability: the Sleeping Beauty and Replicator experiments.

Quantum Theory (QT) has been applied in a number of fields outside physics, e.g. Information Retrieval (IR). A series of pioneering works have verified the necessity to employ QT in IR user models. In this paper, we explore the process of relevance judgement from a novel perspective of the two state vector quantum weak measurement (WM) by considering context information in time domain. Experiments are carried out to verify our arguments.

The formalism of quantum theory in Hilbert space has been applied with success to the modeling and explanation of several cognitive phenomena, whereas traditional cognitive approaches were problematical. However, this 'quantum cognition paradigm' was recently challenged by its proven impossibility to simultaneously model 'question order effects' and 'response replicability'. In Part I of this paper we describe sequential dichotomic measurements within an operational and realistic framework for human cognition elaborated by ourselves, and represent them in a quantum-like 'extended Bloch representation' where the Born rule of quantum probability does not necessarily hold. In Part II we apply this mathematical framework to successfully model question order effects, response replicability and unpacking effects, thus opening the way toward quantum cognition beyond Hilbert space.