Credal predictors are models that are aware of epistemic uncertainty and produce a convex set of probabilistic predictions. They offer a principled way to quantify predictive epistemic uncertainty (EU) and have been shown to improve model robustness in various settings. However, most state-of-the-art methods mainly define EU as disagreement caused by random training initializations, which mostly reflects sensitivity to optimization randomness rather than uncertainty from deeper sources. To address this, we define EU as disagreement among models trained with varying relaxations of the i.i.d. assumption between training and test data. Based on this idea, we propose CreDRO, which learns an ensemble of plausible models through distributionally robust optimization. As a result, CreDRO captures EU not only from training randomness but also from meaningful disagreement due to potential distribution shifts between training and test data. Empirical results show that CreDRO consistently outperforms existing credal methods on tasks such as out-of-distribution detection across multiple benchmarks and selective classification in medical applications.

Organoids, specifically, are an active area of research, providing excellent models for human organs and their functions.

This paper presents an innovative approach to classification tasks called Credal Deep Ensembles (CreDEs), ensembles of novel Credal-Set Neural Networks (CreNets), aiming to improve EU quantification in the framework of credal inference.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

This view enables a structured variational approximation capturing dependencies across variables in the model.

Workinginthestandard potential outcomes framework, we propose a data-driven modification to an arbitrary (nonparametric) prior based on the propensity score that corrects for the first-orderposteriorbias,therebyimprovingperformance.Weillustrateourmethod for Gaussian process (GP) priors using (semi-)synthetic data.

Equipped with the knowledge of sample difficulty, we further propose to use it for regularizing the prediction confidence.

Several approaches to predictive uncertainty quantification have been introduced in recent years, considering uncertainty inaBayesian sense [2,7,18]aswell asfrom afrequentist'spoint ofview [15,5,34].