Stochastic local search (SLS) is a successful paradigm for solving the satisfiability problem of propositional logic. A recent development in this area involves solving not the original instance, but a modified, yet logically equivalent one. Empirically, this technique was found to be promising as it improves the performance of state-of-the-art SLS solvers. Currently, there is only a shallow understanding of how this modification technique affects the runtimes of SLS solvers. Thus, we model this modification process and conduct an empirical analysis of the hardness of logically equivalent formulas. Our results are twofold. First, if the modification process is treated as a random process, a lognormal distribution perfectly characterizes the hardness; implying that the hardness is long-tailed. This means that the modification technique can be further improved by implementing an additional restart mechanism. Thus, as a second contribution, we theoretically prove that all algorithms exhibiting this long-tail property can be further improved by restarts. Consequently, all SAT solvers employing this modification technique can be enhanced.

The Boolean Satisfiability problem (SAT) is important on artificial intelligence community and the impact of its solving on complex problems. Recently, great breakthroughs have been made respectively on stochastic local search (SLS) algorithms for uniform random k-SAT resulting in several state-of-the-art SLS algorithms Score2SAT, YalSAT, ProbSAT, CScoreSAT and on a hybrid algorithm for hard random SAT (HRS) resulting in one state-of-the-art hybrid algorithm SparrowToRiss. However, there is no an algorithm which can effectively solve both uniform random k-SAT and HRS. In this paper, we present a new SLS algorithm named SelectNTS for uniform random k-SAT and HRS. SelectNTS is an improved probability selecting based local search algorithm for SAT problem. The core of SelectNTS relies on new clause and variable selection heuristics. The new clause selection heuristic uses a new clause weighting scheme and a biased random walk. The new variable selection heuristic uses a probability selecting strategy with the variation of CC strategy based on a new variable weighting scheme. Extensive experimental results on the well-known random benchmarks instances from the SAT Competitions in 2017 and 2018, and on randomly generated problems, show that our algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art random SAT algorithms, and our SelectNTS can effectively solve both uniform random k-SAT and HRS.

There are two competing paradigms in successful SAT solvers: Conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) and stochastic local search (SLS). CDCL uses systematic exploration of the search space and has the ability to learn new clauses. SLS examines the neighborhood of the current complete assignment. Unlike CDCL, it lacks the ability to learn from its mistakes. This work revolves around the question whether it is beneficial for SLS to add new clauses to the original formula. We experimentally demonstrate that clauses with a large number of correct literals w. r. t. a fixed solution are beneficial to the runtime of SLS. We call such clauses high-quality clauses. Empirical evaluations show that short clauses learned by CDCL possess the high-quality attribute. We study several domains of randomly generated instances and deduce the most beneficial strategies to add high-quality clauses as a preprocessing step. The strategies are implemented in an SLS solver, and it is shown that this considerably improves the state-of-the-art on randomly generated instances. The results are statistically significant.

This work analyses the potential of restarts for probSAT, a quite successful algorithm for k-SAT, by estimating its runtime distributions on random 3-SAT instances that are close to the phase transition. We estimate an optimal restart time from empirical data, reaching a potential speedup factor of 1.39. Calculating restart times from fitted probability distributions reduces this factor to a maximum of 1.30. A spin-off result is that the Weibull distribution approximates the runtime distribution for over 93% of the used instances well. A machine learning pipeline is presented to compute a restart time for a fixed-cutoff strategy to exploit this potential. The main components of the pipeline are a random forest for determining the distribution type and a neural network for the distribution's parameters. ProbSAT performs statistically significantly better than Luby's restart strategy and the policy without restarts when using the presented approach. The structure is particularly advantageous on hard problems.

We analyze to what extent the random SAT and Max-SAT problems differ in their properties. Our findings suggest that for random $k$-CNF with ratio in a certain range, Max-SAT can be solved by any SAT algorithm with subexponential slowdown, while for formulae with ratios greater than some constant, algorithms under the random walk framework require substantially different heuristics. In light of these results, we propose a novel probabilistic approach for random Max-SAT called ProMS. Experimental results illustrate that ProMS outperforms many state-of-the-art local search solvers on random Max-SAT benchmarks.

We analyze to what extent the random SAT and Max-SAT problems differ in their properties. Our findings suggest that for random k-CNF with ratio in a certain range, Max-SAT can be solved by any SAT algorithm with subexponential slowdown, while for formulae with ratios greater than some constant, algorithms under the random walk framework require substantially different heuristics. In light of these results, we propose a novel probabilistic approach for random Max-SAT called ProMS. Experimental results illustrate that ProMS outperforms many state-of-the-art local search solvers on random Max-SAT benchmarks.