Goto

Collaborating Authors

 pricing


Is your personal data changing what you pay online?

FOX News

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least 15 minutes. Market data provided by Factset . Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions . Mutual Fund and ETF data provided by LSEG . Apple's $250M Siri settlement: How to claim up to $95 The next connected device could be the shirt you're wearing Hacker claims 7.49M customer records stolen from American utility company Is everyone bricking their phone to stop doomscrolling? The secret list that tells scammers you're an easy target How the'Squatter Hunter' is fighting home takeovers with tech AI robot may stop your dog from barking while you're gone His home changed hands for $5. Could it happen to your family?


McDonald's is reportedly using AI to "dynamically" price its burgers

Engadget

McDonald's has been using artificial intelligence to dynamically price menu items in the US and some global markets, according to a report by Reuters. This involves finding the "optimal price" to match what a particular store's patrons would be willing to pay. This fluctuates according to location, and even stores in the same city can have different cost amounts for the same exact items, according to information reviewed by Reuters. This is basically surge pricing, like with ride-share platforms, but for hockey puck burgers that have been sitting under a hot lamp. Reuters got a look at the interface that franchisees use to access this technology and it's pretty creepy. Messages show stuff like "your restaurant is showing MEDIUM SENSITIVITY to price" based on "customer willingness to pay in your area."


What Trump's Most-Favored-Nation Deal Means for Drug Prices

TIME - Tech

Follow this section to personalize your feed and get instant alerts. Follow Go to your personalized feed WHY FOLLOW? Smart Alerts: Get notified about major news as it happens. Follow this tag to personalize your feed and get instant alerts. Follow Go to your personalized feed WHY FOLLOW?


AI is watching your spending and setting your prices accordingly. Lawmakers want to stop it

Los Angeles Times

Things to Do in L.A. AI is watching your spending and setting your prices accordingly. This is read by an automated voice. Please report any issues or inconsistencies here . See more from the L.A. Times in Google Search. Companies are increasingly using AI tools to sift through shoppers' personal data and tailor prices in real time, raising alarms over hidden algorithms that can exploit desperation, income and location.


DeepSeek's AI models are about to cost four times more

Engadget

DeepSeek made its name offering far cheaper AI services than its pricier western competitors, but the cheap ride appears to be at an end. The company has started telling customers to prepare for significant price rises with the advent of its latest model. With the announcement of DeepSeek V4 Pro, the company is raising its API pricing fourfold. The company said it's adopting a new peak and off-peak pricing to "allocate resources more reasonably." Starting on August 16, the DeepSeek V4 Pro model will cost 3.96 for 1 million output tokens at peak hours, more than four times the current rate of 0.87.


Homogeneous Algorithms Can Reduce Competition in Personalized Pricing

Neural Information Processing Systems

Firms' algorithm development practices are often homogeneous. Whether firms train algorithms on similar data or rely on similar pre-trained models, the result is correlated predictions. In the context of personalized pricing, correlated algorithms can be viewed as a means to collude among competing firms, but whether or not this conduct is legal depends on the mechanisms of achieving collusion. We investigate the precise mechanisms through a formal game-theoretic model. Indeed, we find that (1) higher correlation diminishes consumer welfare and (2) as consumers become more price sensitive, firms are increasingly incentivized to compromise on the accuracy of their predictions in exchange for coordination. We demonstrate our theoretical results in a stylized empirical study where two firms compete using personalized pricing algorithms. Our results demonstrate a new mechanism for achieving collusion through correlation, which allows us to analyze its legal implications. Correlation through algorithms is a new frontier of anti-competitive behavior that is largely unconsidered by US antitrust law.


Contextual Online Pricing with (Biased) Offline Data

Neural Information Processing Systems

We study contextual online pricing with biased offline data. For the scalar price elasticity case, we identify the instance-dependent quantity δ2 that measures how far the offline data lies from the (unknown) online optimum. We show that the time length T, bias bound V, size N and dispersion λmin(ˆΣ) of the offline data, and δ2 jointly determine the statistical complexity.


Contextual Dynamic Pricing with Heterogeneous Buyers

Neural Information Processing Systems

We initiate the study of contextual dynamic pricing with a heterogeneous population of buyers, where a seller repeatedly posts prices (over T rounds) that depend on the observable d-dimensional context and receives binary purchase feedback. Unlike prior work assuming homogeneous buyer types, in our setting the buyer's valuation type is drawn from an unknown distribution with finite support size K . We develop a contextual pricing algorithm based on optimistic posterior sampling with regret eO(K dT), which we prove to be tight in dand T up to logarithmic terms. Finally, we refine our analysis for the non-contextual pricing case, proposing a variance-aware zooming algorithm that achieves the optimal dependence on K .


Robust Contextual Pricing

Neural Information Processing Systems

We provide an algorithm with regret O(CdloglogT) for contextual pricing with C corrupted rounds, improving over the previous bound of O(d3Clog2(T)) of Krishnamurthy et al. (2020). The result is based on a reduction that calls the uncorrupted algorithm as a black-box, unlike the previous approach that modifies the inner workings of the uncorrupted algorithm. As a result, it leads to a conceptually simpler algorithm. Finally, we provide a lower bound ruling out a O(C +dloglogT)algorithm. This shows that robustifying contextual pricing is harder than robustifying contextual search with ϵ-ball losses, for which it is possible to design algorithms where corruptions add only an extra additive term C to the regret.


ABayesian Approach to Contextual Dynamic Pricing using the Proportional Hazards Model with Discrete Price Data

Neural Information Processing Systems

Dynamic pricing algorithms typically assume continuous price variables, which may not reflect real-world scenarios where prices are often discrete. This paper demonstrates that leveraging discrete price information within a semi-parametric model can substantially improve performance, depending on the size of the support set of the price variable relative to the time horizon. Specifically, we propose a novel semi-parametric contextual dynamic pricing algorithm, namely BayesCoxCP, based on a Bayesian approach to the Cox proportional hazards model. Our theoretical analysis establishes high-probability regret bounds that adapt to the sparsity level γ, proving that our algorithm achieves a regret upper bound of eO(T(1+γ)/2 + dT) for γ < 1/3 and eO(T2/3 + dT) for γ 1/3, where γ represents the sparsity of the price grid relative to the time horizon T. Through numerical experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed algorithm significantly outperforms an existing method, particularly in scenarios with sparse discrete price points.